Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ppls.

Over the last month or so, a few of us have been conspiring together to bring you a super cool Dyno Chart comparion tool.

Willo, the PHP Guru man that he is, took ideas and suggestions from a few of us and prepared a comparion thingo which allows us to enter our RPM/Speed and power figures from Dyno Pulls and compare them to anyone else we like.

Check it out, post us your graph and let the Chart Bashing begin.

HOOOGE thanks to Willo for donating his time to this worthy cause.

http://sau.garagespank.com/login.php

It's pretty self explanitory, put in EITHER RPM or Speed Verses Power. That's it.

Cheers

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145250-new-sau-dyno-comparison-tool/
Share on other sites

It's starting to get interesting now that more people have entered their graphs.

I'm hoping that in months to come heaps of us enter our runs and we can, as they say in school, compare and contrast.

Thanks heaps Willo. You're a champion of the highest order.

does this take into account automatics, including the fact that full throttle is only achieved when the operator is sure it won't kick back? that makes them hard to compare for low down power

plus they lose more power through the drivetrain..

Just added my last run from September 01... can't wait to see what the difference is now with more boost.

Great work guys...

Perhaps explain how to actually use the system; things like gear ratio and final drive, intial values.

Also; is it possible to have the graph display to be larger?

4.089 for the auto R34 but R33 and R34 manuals are 4.111

Yeah I think comparing to your own previous runs is another great advantage of it.

I don't think torque will ever get on there. We have asked for boost but that is down the track if at all.

The general consensus seems to be boost would be the preference for a second Y-axis scale. I will start looking at it again after I get over all my sh*t being stolen.

The gear ratio, final drive and wheel size parameters are used to auto calculate RPM from speed or speed from RPM. This is a theoretical value only due to real world factors like tyre slip etc. but I'm hoping it is close enough. If you enter values for all these fields and then enter a value in a RPM or speed field it will auto-update the other.

I think I will add a help page as part of the next round of changes as well.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...