Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In respect to my power run above,

can anyone shed some light

on what power and torque figures

are expected with the pfc?

Also, should i run an adjustable fuel regulator,

just to be sure it does not lean out in top-end?

Perhaps, a nismo f.p.r.

PS - no money for injectors atm. :P

Anyone?

you are better off saving $$$ for injectors and do the fuel system right the first time.

fpr's are just a cheap excuse for inadequate fuel system.

if this is on the RB25 look into a couple of sets of S15 injectors (440cc/min side feed), you can pick them up for $200-300 a set

you are better off saving $$$ for injectors and do the fuel system right the first time.

fpr's are just a cheap excuse for inadequate fuel system.

if this is on the RB25 look into a couple of sets of S15 injectors (440cc/min side feed), you can pick them up for $200-300 a set

Ill try hunting a set down today.

Judhement Day Today... :(

I put her on the dyno for a tune with the PFC

She made 238.2RWKW on 13 psi with some slight detonation up top

Knocked back some timing and ran her again safely on 13psi to make 237RWKW

with approx 590N.M torque in third gear close to redline

This was at 100% injector duty cycle and to add my little apex fmic

heated up really badly, inlet temperatures were quite hot.

So next modes coming are probably a garrett fmic/hybrid and 444cc S15 injectors

Will post AFR, PSI and Flyhwheel torque graphs tommorrow, all sheets

have stock and new turbo side by side for comparison.

So all mods are as follows:

HKS dragger + 3" frontpipe

Apex FMIC (300 by 150 by 40)

Im guessing I have a bigger fuel pump :D

Apexi Power FC

Garrett GT3071R (Integrally Gated)

Stock: injectors, fpr & dump-pipe

Previously:

I was running an SAF-C SII and stock turbo

and made 211RWKW on 14psi

PS - She F*&%$KKKKKIN' PULLS IN THIRD :sorcerer:

Its Calder parks final drag racing meet for the year this Friday the 15th

If you compete in it, as a Christmas gift you get to enter again in January

next year for FREE.

So ill be there...trying my best with my worn tyres :P

But in January ill be back with M/T semi slicks ;)

Will post up time slips when I get a chance.

Edited by Nabil

Its tomorrow... Wheres the dyno sheet. :O

What Ign timing are you running up top where you were experiencing det?

Drop the afr's a touch 11.5:1, push more boost in and start pulling that timing back until she begins to make less power. :sweat:

No, not a typo.

I guess ill have to wait and see.

Created Motorsports white drift R33 had this set-up

but with a t25/28 flange and 0.82 ex a/r

and he made 269rwkw with a significantly linear power curve.

I was under the impression that it was hi-flowed to around 82, reason being the rear housing is being changed to a new garret style internally gated 35R something like a 3582 (or thereabouts, new from garrett aparently), car has been running dramas suspect actuator and its rear housing was too inefficient for its application.

Having said that it was a verry respoisive turbo.

You should have fun with your setup, but i think it could be a little too restrictive if your chasing over 280 at the wheels easily with a standard engine.....It seems more suited to a RB20 the more i look at it, although the response would be a pig.

my 2cents

-Jez

Edited by Wheezy

PSI Graph

Starts boosting at approx. 3100rpm and reaches

full boost at say 3950rpm

Stock turbo starts boosting

at 2850rpm at reaches full boost by 3000rpm

post-21233-1166064676.jpg

Edited by Nabil

Tractive Torgue Graph in 4th Gear

Peak torque transferred to the rear wheels

in 4th gear is approx. 460N.m at 127kph

Has heaps more mid range and pulls hard to redline.

(Damn should of asked for Torque vs. RPM) :dry:

post-21233-1166065071.jpg

Edited by Nabil
Its tomorrow... Wheres the dyno sheet. :dry:

What Ign timing are you running up top where you were experiencing det?

Drop the afr's a touch 11.5:1, push more boost in and start pulling that timing back until she begins to make less power. :P

Not sure when it occured but

its possibly somewhere beyond 5500rpm.

It needs more boost to pump up that mid range some more. :)

None the less a nice power increase considering boost is essentially the same.

Thanks Cubes, shes got more in her...ill

have to wait and see with bigger injectors

and a cooler. :)

Cheers,

Bill

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Thread revival FTW :)

Have you developed this thing any further Bill?

I haven't I'm afraid and it brings a tear to my eye.

I sold the turbo kit to another dude on this forum.

I hope to find out one day how he went with this set-up.

I'll be back on this forum soon when I get back in my

garage and stir some horsepower up! lol :D

Sorry for the long awaited reply! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...