Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In respect to my power run above,

can anyone shed some light

on what power and torque figures

are expected with the pfc?

Also, should i run an adjustable fuel regulator,

just to be sure it does not lean out in top-end?

Perhaps, a nismo f.p.r.

PS - no money for injectors atm. :P

Anyone?

you are better off saving $$$ for injectors and do the fuel system right the first time.

fpr's are just a cheap excuse for inadequate fuel system.

if this is on the RB25 look into a couple of sets of S15 injectors (440cc/min side feed), you can pick them up for $200-300 a set

you are better off saving $$$ for injectors and do the fuel system right the first time.

fpr's are just a cheap excuse for inadequate fuel system.

if this is on the RB25 look into a couple of sets of S15 injectors (440cc/min side feed), you can pick them up for $200-300 a set

Ill try hunting a set down today.

Judhement Day Today... :(

I put her on the dyno for a tune with the PFC

She made 238.2RWKW on 13 psi with some slight detonation up top

Knocked back some timing and ran her again safely on 13psi to make 237RWKW

with approx 590N.M torque in third gear close to redline

This was at 100% injector duty cycle and to add my little apex fmic

heated up really badly, inlet temperatures were quite hot.

So next modes coming are probably a garrett fmic/hybrid and 444cc S15 injectors

Will post AFR, PSI and Flyhwheel torque graphs tommorrow, all sheets

have stock and new turbo side by side for comparison.

So all mods are as follows:

HKS dragger + 3" frontpipe

Apex FMIC (300 by 150 by 40)

Im guessing I have a bigger fuel pump :D

Apexi Power FC

Garrett GT3071R (Integrally Gated)

Stock: injectors, fpr & dump-pipe

Previously:

I was running an SAF-C SII and stock turbo

and made 211RWKW on 14psi

PS - She F*&%$KKKKKIN' PULLS IN THIRD :sorcerer:

Its Calder parks final drag racing meet for the year this Friday the 15th

If you compete in it, as a Christmas gift you get to enter again in January

next year for FREE.

So ill be there...trying my best with my worn tyres :P

But in January ill be back with M/T semi slicks ;)

Will post up time slips when I get a chance.

Edited by Nabil

Its tomorrow... Wheres the dyno sheet. :O

What Ign timing are you running up top where you were experiencing det?

Drop the afr's a touch 11.5:1, push more boost in and start pulling that timing back until she begins to make less power. :sweat:

No, not a typo.

I guess ill have to wait and see.

Created Motorsports white drift R33 had this set-up

but with a t25/28 flange and 0.82 ex a/r

and he made 269rwkw with a significantly linear power curve.

I was under the impression that it was hi-flowed to around 82, reason being the rear housing is being changed to a new garret style internally gated 35R something like a 3582 (or thereabouts, new from garrett aparently), car has been running dramas suspect actuator and its rear housing was too inefficient for its application.

Having said that it was a verry respoisive turbo.

You should have fun with your setup, but i think it could be a little too restrictive if your chasing over 280 at the wheels easily with a standard engine.....It seems more suited to a RB20 the more i look at it, although the response would be a pig.

my 2cents

-Jez

Edited by Wheezy

PSI Graph

Starts boosting at approx. 3100rpm and reaches

full boost at say 3950rpm

Stock turbo starts boosting

at 2850rpm at reaches full boost by 3000rpm

post-21233-1166064676.jpg

Edited by Nabil

Tractive Torgue Graph in 4th Gear

Peak torque transferred to the rear wheels

in 4th gear is approx. 460N.m at 127kph

Has heaps more mid range and pulls hard to redline.

(Damn should of asked for Torque vs. RPM) :dry:

post-21233-1166065071.jpg

Edited by Nabil
Its tomorrow... Wheres the dyno sheet. :dry:

What Ign timing are you running up top where you were experiencing det?

Drop the afr's a touch 11.5:1, push more boost in and start pulling that timing back until she begins to make less power. :P

Not sure when it occured but

its possibly somewhere beyond 5500rpm.

It needs more boost to pump up that mid range some more. :)

None the less a nice power increase considering boost is essentially the same.

Thanks Cubes, shes got more in her...ill

have to wait and see with bigger injectors

and a cooler. :)

Cheers,

Bill

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Thread revival FTW :)

Have you developed this thing any further Bill?

I haven't I'm afraid and it brings a tear to my eye.

I sold the turbo kit to another dude on this forum.

I hope to find out one day how he went with this set-up.

I'll be back on this forum soon when I get back in my

garage and stir some horsepower up! lol :D

Sorry for the long awaited reply! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, I’m a veteran detailer with years of hands-on experience. I’ll be sharing quick, effective detailing tips to help you keep your Skyline (or any ride) looking its best. Got a question? Fire away!
    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
×
×
  • Create New...