Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Paul;

My comment about the F-CON being used in the top GTRs in the world was in response to a previous comment that needed justification. I totally agree that it has zero relevance to this case.

"any ecu can make a car go fast, its how well its tuned and of course additional features it has"

Little bit contradictory...

True any ECU can be made to tune a car so it's fast... but as you just said: how well it's tuned and the features. Can't tune a ECU well when it just doesn't have the features nor does it have the tunability.

SAFCII is good; but not for the power you're talking about 250rwkw? Don't think so...

Finally, back on the E-Manage topic:

If you do some research you will find that many SAU people have had major problems with just the INSTALLATION of the E-Manage let alone using it. 666DAN will be able to back me up on this. You simply cannot just plug it in an make it work. I think there was a lot of DIY involved in order to make it work stably.

MAP capabilities? Using the Profec B? Hmmm.... and just take a look at N I B's comment.

F-CON, hasn't skipped a beat~

why do you think the safc cant get to 250rwkw? all it does it bend the afm signal. sure its a comprimise but all of the solutions are comprimises.

i dont see why a particular ecu would be limited to a power level, its just ign and inj values. i see no reason why the safc could not get a customer to 250rwkw. it will be a more tedious to do the initial tune as youll get to a point where it will advance the timing too much and induce detonation, but you should be able to get 250rwkw.

SAFC is a signal bender only with all fuel tuning changes have an affect on timing with no means to sort this problem.If you lean out an SAFC it tells the ECU its under less load so it moves the ECU into a lower load zone delivering less fuel but also more timing often leading to detonation.

SAFCs place in the food chain is basic modded cars only.

As far as I know SAFC is a fuel controller only (+/- 16 points) along a preset RPM range.

Problems:

1) No ignition changes

2) No compensation for bigger injectors (stock ECUs won't even work with bigger injectors)

3) What N I B said...

of course the safc wont work with bigger injectors

the user doesnt need to change injectors

it will move the ign timing around as the afm signal it bent

as the load is moved around, so to are the ign/inj load points

yeah Paul is correct from my exp.

I have run them had not real issues...

max'n out injectors is mod/tune dependant - mine were 95% at 260rwkw...with an EMANAGE...but thats with a better fuel pump...not std fuel pressure.

The emange will run to 280 cos I have done it...But I got a much better tune form the PFC.

I have also ran the emanage and the SAFC in my FTO...low power app with EXACTLY the same dyno after....

Every1 else has posted pros and cons...

Get a PFC or Haltech as suggested.

With the emanage blue... the options all add up, e.g. the software (unless your tuner already has it), the injector harness, etc. You should check out the emanage ultimate if you're looking at going this road.

  • 2 months later...

The Ultimate seem like a good buy with all the harness and support tool provided. Anyway it is nice to be able to fiddle with the software and tuning by yourself, but tuning it wrong is high which let to my friend blowing up his engine on the same day he dyno then when home to alter the setting himself. Most piggy back & ECU should be tune on the dyno then leave it once it's done. I will probably go for an FCon SZ or a 2nd FCON Vpro depending on availability plus i have a tuner who drives a GTT with Vpro too. We are always chasing for power, so buy something that do not limit ur goal for many year to come since the ECU is the brain for everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...