Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Kichigai

I am an accountant for a training and payroll administration company in Tech park.

Is that Tech Parh, as in Curtin Uni Tech Park? I work at Curtin and take calls from there all the time!

i should be writing in the vic section however we dont have a thread like this so this will do.

im andrew, i have an IT degree however i want to stay out of full time employment as long as I can. Im thinking about going back to school to get some kind of engineering degree. soemthing which builds upon the knowledge i already have.

Originally posted by KMale

....

It is interesting that so many IT people have a love for Skylines don't cha think :P [/b]

Name : Richard

Occupation : Ex Sys/Network Admin in mining, but now doing apps support in Oil/Gas industry.

Yes, interesting that there are so many IT people here. Sad thing is that the IT industry is not doing too well... :). Hate to be an unemployed IT specialist at the moment :D

my names glen, im 19 / male

I own and operate with 2 other people a graphic design company which is does pretty well :P

While my business partners are running the show I can be found designing adverts for a local paper, and atm developing the great southern phone directory....woopie dee dooaaa

Isn't too bad but I really want to focus on my career in the pimp industry. :)

One of the few non IT guys but it gets worse

Name is Alan and I am a liquidator. Yep, senior insolvency manager for a 2nd tier accounting firm in West Perth. I am the one who comes in, closes ya down and takes everything. Fun stuff !!!!

I also do nicer stuff like reconstruct businesses, consultancy work to make them more profitable, etc

Originally posted by MetBlue_GTST

Alan... Work at Thornlie TAFE as a Lecturer in Computer Networking... Skyline nut :crazy:

Aaaahhh you are the dude who works at Thornlie Tafe with the R33..... my dad is also a lecturer and he said there is one in the staff carpark quite often.... plus he sometimes hears you take off :-)

Everyone knows me as Macka :)

Joe and Paul did not learn Pimpin from me!....I am much classier!

Young strich9 and Adam are learning good tho..

:jump:

Electronics Tech for an electrical company.

I look after All locomotive electronics in WA and repair mining control gear

CRASH course in mechanics :uh-huh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...