Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by DREMEN

Anyone here done this on their R33 GTS-25T???

i'm sure there are some out there.

Originally posted by DREMEN

Who did you get to do the work???

Depends on where you are, local/interstate workshop?

Originally posted by DREMEN

How much did it cost?

Largely depends on *see above response*, and also how much work you are doing.

Originally posted by DREMEN

What sort of gains did you make?

As mentioned, depends on how 'tuff' you want the original one to be rebuilt to.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-311978
Share on other sites

I've got my standard r33 turbo highflowed - did it a couple of months ago. I got it done with a lot of other work so i'm not sure how much it came to. Precision did mine (through Envy Imports located on the Northern Beaches).

My car hits fuel/boost cut if I increase the boost a little bit past stock, so I bought myself a new powerFC which will be tuned next wednesday.

I think B-Man has a high flowed turbo, but was more expensive and probably better than mine.

Mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-313500
Share on other sites

I had my turbo high flowed at ATS in adelaide... Cost me about 2k from memory (2 years ago)...

They're good if you're just chasing an extra 20rwkw, but if you want to make a decent amount of power, just put the extra $$$ to a new turbo. The housings (comp and exhaust) are too small to make big power.

matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-313866
Share on other sites

Hi DREMEN, we have a R34 GTT with a GCG hi flowed turbo on it, makes 260 rwkw. Cost a bit under $2K.

Hi skyr31, our hi flows from GCG have all had;

The compressor wheel replaced with a larger one

The compressor cover machined to suite the larger compressor

The turbine replaced with a larger one

(stainless steel replacing the standard ceramic)

The turbine cover machined to suite the larger turbine

A larger diameter shaft

Larger diameter ball bearings

All the rotating stuff micro balanced

New seals fitted.

So basically everything that wears is replaced, so it is almost like a new turbo. Much stronger with the larger shaft, not ceramic turbine and larger balls. Higher flowing due to larger turbine and compressor. Best of all everything bolts back up to the turbo as per standard.

There is also an upgrade path, if you want more power then they can replace the compressor cover with a larger one and/or the turbine cover. Much cheaper than buying another turbo, particulalry when you include the cost of fabricating parts to fit non standard turbos.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-316466
Share on other sites

Hi TT said, "GCG stage 1 hi flow turbo requires 22psi to make 450hp at the engine, as stated in a previous related thread."

And I said that's not quite correct in the "previous related thread".

We have one on an RB25DET that makes 260 rwkw at 19 psi. We also have one on an RB30DET that makes over 300 rwkw at 20 psi. On a properly set up engine it does not need 22 psi to make 450 bhp. On a badly set up engine it might.

The engine has way more to do with it than the turbo.

Hope that helps clarify

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-318024
Share on other sites

Hi macka, when you post "The quality of the turbo is not affected" your not saying that a "sleeve bearing core" is as good as a ball bearing core are you?

Sorry, but you get what you pay for. Plus the prices that appear on websites are "Recommended Retail Prices". Ring up you might be pleasantly surpised, I quite often am.

Hope that helps some more.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15293-high-flow-turbo/#findComment-318027
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...