Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

me neither :-)

I sell two types now for RB30. the original design and a PHAT rod for serious power.

PHAT'S are heavier but they have a thicker beam, more steel around the bolt area and across the bottom cap.

Ive used both and cant really distinguish any noticable difference in response.

Anyway thats my two cents worth

hmm so we switched the turbine housing over to the modified one by kyle and it holds boost perfectly now with no fluctuations, however its not making power. Before when it was spiking, it was making 290kw now its down to 220kw.

I tell ya i feel like driving the whole race car straight into the brisbane river and letting it sink...starting from scratch, then i can use a 32 like i originally wanted.

Oh Brad did you get my message last night?

Edited by r33_racer

Problem solved.

Looks like the cat or middle muffler has collapsed and blocked most of the exhaust.

Got it to 1 bar after I dropped the exhaust at the dump pipe flange and went for a blat up the street.

Whoo hoo, now to just replace the cat or muffler and back to the dyno.

Think Ill have a few beers tonight.

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

Edited by Godzilla33

Hi Matt

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Ill also calculate your comp from the figure you have given and see what we turn out.

Cheers

Hey Spool, you got any specials on your RB30 CP pistons coming up? have the 9:1's got a 6cc dome? My 26 head seems to have 65.5cc. It would seem that using flat tops would give me a comp ratio of 7.88:1 with a .0 deck height, 1.2mm head gasket, 0.5mm oversize. taking the 6cc dome of the 9:1's (if im right) I would actually end up with 8.5:1. Any extra info would be good.

Thanks, Matt

assuming your head gasket is 87mm in diameter , and using the other figures you have given.

1.2mm gasket

86.5mm bore

11cc dome

65.5 cc combustion chamber

you will get 9.1:0 with the cp 9.0:1 piston

Your calculations using the 6cc dome are correct though.

Thanks for the info, just using the std RB26 head gasket (think its actually 1.28mm) gasket is pretty close to 87mm I think, planning on O ringing. Think I might stick with the flat tops to be safe.

From memory _ I will confirm. The CP's have an 11cc dome on their 9.0:1 pistons.

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :wave:

I had a quiet day at work today so did a bit of emailing and ringing around to find out about pistons....

CP Quantum Racing Industries

All compression ratios are based on zero deck height, 1.2mm head gasket (7.13cc), RB25 @ 62.5cc, RB26 @ 64.5cc. They assure me they have done alot of work to make sure the facts are correct.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20

Flat top with no valve pockets

8.2:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

p/n= CP-RB30/26-.20-9.0

6.0cc dome top,

9.0:1 compression with RB25 head and bit less with RB26 head

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize but can be custom ordered in any size.

*Care must be taken when using on RB26 with more than 11.5mm valve lift*

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Edited by VHR32

I have the chance to buy a GT30 .82 with custom wheels in it, which apparently made 367rwKw @ 24psi boost (C16) on a RB25.

I'm aiming for 350rwKw on 98 fuel.

Would this be a bit on the small side on a RB30/26 street/track car??

Have a good look around here...

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...bochargers.html

GT30R is listed as GT3076r

GT35R is listed as GT3582r

Have a look at their wheel sizes. The multiple listings of the same GT3076r and gt3582r is off the top of my head just different turbine housing configs (T4, T3 4 bolt etc etc).

Like I said - it was from memory. You could be correct. I think I have a set here, Ill check them and also ring Quantum on Monday to confirm for you ( and me ).

Gday Spool,

Hmmmm I got an email from QRI and they assured me CP 9.0 were 6cc dome?!

I thought you would be the best person to ask!

Arias apparently have a 13cc dome on one of their pistons which would make even higher c/r :)

The NEO head is approx 10cc smaller than the R33 ( I cant remember the exact cc's - I should keep all this info somewhere ). The head was also surfaced when reconditioned and ported, so that decreases the comb chamber a little also.

I cc'd everything when I built my engine, combustion chamber, piston valve reliefs, etc

Also, I thought with RB30ET std 7.8:1 pistons the c/r with a R33 RB25 head is about 7.1:1, so using 8.5:1 (quoted off the ACL website) ACL forgies might make it approx 7.8:1?

Even if the R34 NEO head has smaller chambers, it surely does it reallywork out to be 8.5:1?!?

Or was it all CC'd?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...