Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey buddy,

i'm running N1's for the first little while and then changing to GTRS's. What i've done is jsut t-pieced the lines into the single line on the block :P

i would grab some pics for ya, but the motors currently in the car for the dry sump and exhaust fab

Hi R32 TT I'm doing the same as Shanef. Cannot comment on performance ''in service'' but it was suggested by a very good workshop with RB26/30 experience who made the fittings. What are you doing for an adapter plate and pickup?

Hi R32 TT I'm doing the same as Shanef. Cannot comment on performance ''in service'' but it was suggested by a very good workshop with RB26/30 experience who made the fittings. What are you doing for an adapter plate and pickup?

Cheers for that guys. I am running a Performance Metalcraft Sump and a 10mm adaptor plate via SK..

My workshop have decided they're going to pull the sump back off though, weld on a couple of dash 10 fittings and run from the Turbos back to those individually... Or, if the room is tight, we may use the oil return on the side of the block, and just one fitting on the sump... they're a bit worried that it may 'back up' after a few hard laps at the circuit..

Here you can see there is only one oil return on the block (of course). And also you can see the oil return from the back of the head. I figure I may have to fit a couple of more fittings to the sump, just behind the head return line...

Geez you guys are running N1's to begin with? They're going to spool ~damn~ quick I bet ! :)

post-20408-1178014949.jpg

post-20408-1178015003.jpg

A quick question for you guys.. I've done a search but couldn't find much information.

A R33 i'm looking at that's for sale has a half buggered motor (has been running stock bottom end, 280rwkw via a 2835ProS for a couple of years). For a price, he's offered to purchase a Proengine 3L bottom end (~$5.9k), and get UAS to fit the motor (~$3k). It would be very responsive with that turbo, I reckon it would be a lot of fun to drive.. although that turbo would max out at ~300rwkw I so, but that's still OK by me. I want a quick street car and nothing more.

ANYWAY.. what's the reliability on this setup going to be like? I know with the factory bottom end, they are normally great.. is getting work like this done and the end power figure going to turn a car into something I always have to fix / repair?? Or are they pretty reliable? I realise the driveline is pretty tough. I need a car that can do 20,000kms a year, take a hammering once in a while, and be reliable. Am I dreaming? For some reason I naturally think cars with rebuilt motors are rarely as reliable.

Edited by TommO

Phewww..

this is a long read.

After thinking about it I have deceded to do a budget RB30 buildup to put in my R32. I have some things i need clearing up before i buy the parts.

I am going to use the following

RB30E series 2 block with standard pistons, rods, crank

RB25DE head from an R32 frontcut (non VCT)

This should give me a compression ratio of around 8.3:1 from what I have been reading.

The other bits going in the build are:

RB25 sliding performance hiflow

splitfire coilpacks

stock manifolds from RB20

all ancelleries from RB20

FMiC

GTR injectors

RB20ECU remapped

Z32 AFM

I know the turbo is really a bit small for the RB30det and it will only nudge 250rwkw. that's fine with me its the torque i am after and I am a bit sick of revving the guts out of the rb 20.

Things I need to know:

1. The turbo is designed to run 18psi. is this boost pressure to high? I think it should be fine as the static comp of the RB20 is higher and I corrently run the same PSI on it. The last thing I want is to build it to find out it will not like running high PSI Of course I will be upgrading the valve springs to at least RB20 Items.

2. Will the Cefiro cross member allow the engine to sit low enough to close the bonnet? I do not want to have engine mounts fabbed if i can avoid it.

I will be putting the motor in myself but will be having all the assembly done by an engine builder.

the other bits going in the build are:

RB25 sliding performance hiflow

1. The turbo is designed to run 18psi. is this boost pressure to high? I think it should be fine as the static comp of the RB20 is higher and I corrently run the same PSI on it. The last thing I want is to build it to find out it will not like running high PSI Of course I will be upgrading the valve springs to at least RB20 Items.

the turbo is too small, with stock diff gears 4.11 it will nose over very early and run out of puff

it will probably come on too early as well. i suggest you look into a larger housing, something that will give linear response

18psi is only relevant to how much exhaust gas the engine flows. 18psi on an rb20 and 18psi on an rb30 are completely different things

A quick question for you guys.. I've done a search but couldn't find much information.

A R33 i'm looking at that's for sale has a half buggered motor (has been running stock bottom end, 280rwkw via a 2835ProS for a couple of years). For a price, he's offered to purchase a Proengine 3L bottom end (~$5.9k), and get UAS to fit the motor (~$3k). It would be very responsive with that turbo, I reckon it would be a lot of fun to drive.. although that turbo would max out at ~300rwkw I so, but that's still OK by me. I want a quick street car and nothing more.

ANYWAY.. what's the reliability on this setup going to be like? I know with the factory bottom end, they are normally great.. is getting work like this done and the end power figure going to turn a car into something I always have to fix / repair?? Or are they pretty reliable? I realise the driveline is pretty tough. I need a car that can do 20,000kms a year, take a hammering once in a while, and be reliable. Am I dreaming? For some reason I naturally think cars with rebuilt motors are rarely as reliable.

i hope the 5.9K rebuild incudes all the good bits ie forgies otherwise it's an expensive build. ditto the $3K to fit, i hope that at least includes a tune. 300rwkw is quite a bit to handle in a 2wd car and probably over the limit on stock internals, not sure from your post if you're using stock or forged. either way, the reliability comes down to workmanship and tuning (ie workmanship) as there is no reason why the thing should break if done properly. Cubes has done 50K km plus with no issues. if you have a problem with rebuilt motors that's understandable given some of the stories floating around but it's also what people do with their rebuilt motors that's the problem.

Cheers for that guys. I am running a Performance Metalcraft Sump and a 10mm adaptor plate via SK..

My workshop have decided they're going to pull the sump back off though, weld on a couple of dash 10 fittings and run from the Turbos back to those individually... Or, if the room is tight, we may use the oil return on the side of the block, and just one fitting on the sump... they're a bit worried that it may 'back up' after a few hard laps at the circuit..

Here you can see there is only one oil return on the block (of course). And also you can see the oil return from the back of the head. I figure I may have to fit a couple of more fittings to the sump, just behind the head return line...

Geez you guys are running N1's to begin with? They're going to spool ~damn~ quick I bet ! :)

Yes the N1s are going to be interesting. What turbos are you using? Make sure that the oil return from the head points downwards all the way - as much as possible - as it's only gravity feed. Looks like it snakes upwards a little in the pic but it's probably just that way for the photo.

Cheers

Phewww..

this is a long read.

After thinking about it I have deceded to do a budget RB30 buildup to put in my R32. I have some things i need clearing up before i buy the parts.

I am going to use the following

RB30E series 2 block with standard pistons, rods, crank

RB25DE head from an R32 frontcut (non VCT)

This should give me a compression ratio of around 8.3:1 from what I have been reading.

The other bits going in the build are:

RB25 sliding performance hiflow

splitfire coilpacks

stock manifolds from RB20

all ancelleries from RB20

FMiC

GTR injectors

RB20ECU remapped

Z32 AFM

I know the turbo is really a bit small for the RB30det and it will only nudge 250rwkw. that's fine with me its the torque i am after and I am a bit sick of revving the guts out of the rb 20.

Things I need to know:

1. The turbo is designed to run 18psi. is this boost pressure to high? I think it should be fine as the static comp of the RB20 is higher and I corrently run the same PSI on it. The last thing I want is to build it to find out it will not like running high PSI Of course I will be upgrading the valve springs to at least RB20 Items.

2. Will the Cefiro cross member allow the engine to sit low enough to close the bonnet? I do not want to have engine mounts fabbed if i can avoid it.

I will be putting the motor in myself but will be having all the assembly done by an engine builder.

1.) The boost will not be too high, rb20 valve springs aren't really an upgrade on the 25de ones, so find yourself some GTR ones.

2.) I haven't heard of anyone using the cefiro crossmember to lower the engine, if your using standard plenum you are going to have to lower the engine mounts, one of them i a simple redrill but the other one is a little tougher!

Edited by mr_rbman

CEF11E,

Your going to be one of the first I know of doing this in a Ceffy so please do report back to how much it lowers the motor by. :blink:

I would be very interested as the subframes 'may' be interchangable. Possibly an option for the R32 GTR/GTS4 girlies who have problems controlling wheelspin with their right foot. :w00t:

The turbo will be fine with the stock exh and plenum setup as without working on the inlet/exh. the rb30det's tend not to rev past 7000rpm too well anyway. It will pull nicely to 6500rpm ish.

CEF11E,

Your going to be one of the first I know of doing this in a Ceffy so please do report back to how much it lowers the motor by. :w00t:

I would be very interested as the subframes 'may' be interchangable. Possibly an option for the R32 GTR/GTS4 girlies who have problems controlling wheelspin with their right foot. :rofl:

The turbo will be fine with the stock exh and plenum setup as without working on the inlet/exh. the rb30det's tend not to rev past 7000rpm too well anyway. It will pull nicely to 6500rpm ish.

I was told that my exsisting HKS GTRS would choke the engine at about 5500rpm, thus power will plummit after that; wouldn't a hi-flow be more restrictive? Maybe adapting the VG30/NEO25 turbo ext housing will help the issue a little? :blink:

On the dyno it will nose over but on the road it will feel 'ok' to rev to 6000-6500rpm.

With the stock exh. manifold and inlet it won't be making a great deal more power past 5500-6000rpm anyway.

Soooo select a turbo that will provide the most area under the curve under 5500-6000rpm.

Bolt a GT35r on with the stock exh. and inlet and you end up with a rather peaky motor that has a small power band.

From the results I've seen over the years I really do think if your running a stock inlet and exh. manifold you really are best of with a turbo no bigger than a GT30 as you simply don't have the rev's to make the most of the larger turbo.

So you think i need an exhaust manifold?

I have previously PM'ed you my other mods and the exhaust manifold is really the only std part that may restrict air-flow. I hope to have a 8k rev limiter, but will set it to 7200 for 99% of the time. My std ext manifold has been match ported to the head and also ported where it meets the turbo.

I do not want to cap my limiter to 6500rpm as i think this will effect my track speed.

You wont get much of a gain from port matching the manifold in terms of how much the manifold itself is posing a restricton.

Porting either end doesnt get around the runners not flowing and its design, which isnt for 3ltrs of flow in big RPM :P

You wont need to "cap" it as such, it will just stop making power.

But that wont matter as you just grab another gear if you know when its going to do this :worship:

Its basically like an RB26 with GT-SS really. Not a special top end, but a honking low-mid range.

Soon as you know it noses over, just grab the next gear and away you go. There isnt a need to take the motor to its RPM limit each time.

Good thing about early power like that is you might be able to stay in a gear rather than requiring a downshit.

If you need 8000rpm on a 30DET, you might aswell have a GT42 or something on there as no turbo should need that much on a 30DET unless its BIG

But more rpm can mean a greater spread of power.

ie: instead of having a power band 3500rpm wide, i am hoping for a band 4500rpm wide.

It's all about having a greater average/usable power; not interested in peak power. So you think my manifold will restrict flow, thus capping usable rpm.

The turbo is definately a GT30R-IW

Indeed. But if you have a turbo thats making power @ 8000rpm, i'll be surprised.

A GT30 will have nosed over well and truly by 7500rpm you'll find. Possibly even 7000rpm.

I'd see how you go first to be honest.

It wont cap it as such, you'll still be able to rev it. It just wont make more power and will drop off.

Sometimes fast, sometimes not too bad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
×
×
  • Create New...