Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks Craved, is the other whole the VCT return and if so do i have to block it aswell and plumb a return in?

I will not be usibf VCT now and never will so i am looking for the simplest solution.

thanks Craved, is the other whole the VCT return and if so do i have to block it aswell and plumb a return in?

I will not be usibf VCT now and never will so i am looking for the simplest solution.

I think you have to put a grub screw or weld the oil return as it doesn't line up with rb30 block and then you have the external oil return plumbing back to the turbo oil return line.

I haven't found a suitable head yet but you can check this with a head gasket if you've got one. If the oil return on the head and the block lines up with the hole in gasket just leave it unplugged, if hole in the gasket doesn't line up with with block assuming you're using an rb25 gasket you'll have to block it.

Thanks BAMR33.

I have pretty much got it worked out. that photo shows turbo oil and water return and also another return from the front of the head that is tee'd into the turbo oil drain. but from what I can see no VCT :)

I have drilled and tapped the VCT feed to M8. and will be putting a grub screw in there. I have also drilled and tapped a new supply point in the VCT gallery on the front of the head about 50mm higher that it has been blocked off. I just need to get a few fittings and it will all be sorted.

I havent got my gaskets yet. but will take a lot of photos of the build for others.

I think an Apology is in order for Gary (Sydneykid). :thumbsup:

I doubted his suggestion that a 1.5mm restrictor up front and rear blocked off was perfecty fine for the R32 RB25DE head with no VCT.

So I went and did it anyway :) and it is 11ty billion percent fine.

Plenty of oil up top; top ends nice and quiet; no tapping when it comes off a rev; its all good. :D

So my apologies Buddy! :)

----

I do know of a RB30DET that ran with 2 x 1.1mm restrictors and that had the lifters tapping a tad after a high rev pull.

Not sure the flow dynamics of it all BUT is it possible the 2 x 1.1mm restrictors results in less oil pressure up top than a single 1.5mm?

Im running 2 x 0.75mm restrictors, but do have solid lifters in the NEO head.

I think an Apology is in order for Gary (Sydneykid).

I doubted his suggestion that a 1.5mm restrictor up front and rear blocked off was perfecty fine for the R32 RB25DE head with no VCT.

So I went and did it anyway and it is 11ty billion percent fine.

Plenty of oil up top; top ends nice and quiet; no tapping when it comes off a rev; its all good.

So my apologies Buddy!

----

I do know of a RB30DET that ran with 2 x 1.1mm restrictors and that had the lifters tapping a tad after a high rev pull.

Not sure the flow dynamics of it all BUT is it possible the 2 x 1.1mm restrictors results in less oil pressure up top than a single 1.5mm?

Here are a few pics of the dummy assembly of my 26/30, have the follwing mods.

post-20864-1186309640_thumb.jpgpost-20864-1186309749_thumb.jpgpost-20864-1186309762_thumb.jpgpost-20864-1186309790_thumb.jpg

Arias 40 thou forgies (ceramic coated)

8.8-9:1 comp

25thou squish

eagle forged rods

knife edged, cryogeniced and balanced crank

N1 oil pump

crank collar(proengines)

8l sump

main studs

head studs

Cometic or HKS head gasket

Ported head with 1mm o/s valves

HKS valve springs

Toda 10.2mm 272deg cams

Adjustable camgears

720cc sards

HKS FPR

Nistune ecu(coming)

Modified "Sub-zero" inlet manifold

90mm throttle body

modified AFM

HKS low mount T45S turbo kit(ceramic coated)

50mm wastegate(ceramic coated)

probably WM injection

MSD dis-4

M&W coils

Home made Sump adapter

Hopin to make close to 450rwkw

PS does anyone know what valve clearances to run?

Not sure the flow dynamics of it all BUT is it possible the 2 x 1.1mm restrictors results in less oil pressure up top than a single 1.5mm?

Pressure is a measure of restriction, not flow. It is a function of flow though.

Maybe it was just a bit loose up top....

And SK does now his stuff :thumbsup:

Pressure is a measure of restriction, not flow. It is a function of flow though.

Maybe it was just a bit loose up top....

And SK does now his stuff :)

So saying that would it be possible for the larger 1.5mm to flow more of that 'thick' oil than 2 smaller 1.1's?

Imagine a thick gel pushing through 2 1.1mm holes, it may not flow through at all; then a single 2mm hole it may. If that makes sense. :S

In a way similiar as to selecting the correct viscosity oil for a given bearing clearance.

Gut feeling says no. Maybe its bottom end was on its way out as 6months later it did spin a bearing.

------

I should also say its getting NO blowby. Absolutely nothing and there's noticably more oil sitting in the sump with the motor running.

Prior with it idling around the oil level would suck to the Low mark. Now it sits 3/4 up. :thumbsup:

It should flow more through the 1.5 even though the 1.1s have a slightly larger cross sectional area, due to the surface roughness equations and the interaction of the sharp edge orifice/turbulent layer effect, but then there are journal clearances to consider. It's never exact.

If the bottom end was on its way out then likely the head rattling was an indication of lack of flow. It is a closely balanced equation for the distribution of flow and so tolerances need to be carefully guaged and the correct bearings ordered. The one area though that can end up with too much flow is the head so we restrict flow with the smaller restrictor.

That's why I would never recommend running in an RB30 on a standard ECU, the richness will stop the rings bedding in properly and in extreme cases lead to glazed bores. The retarded ignition results in incomplete combustion which fouls up everything from plugs to cats.

:P cheers :D

And indeed the cat light did come on once for about 3 seconds at the top of a long hill last time I drove it - and before seeing Sydneykid's posts. Haven't dropped the pipe yet to have a look at the cat, does anyone know for sure if I should expect dead / highly degraded / clogged cat? Of course if it's obviously shagged I'll get a new one but I've never shagged a cat before (go on laugh) so not sure if the temporary overheat would be catastrophic, would prefer to avoid the cost of a new one.

And I've loaned a PFC, dyno on Wed morning to sort this out.

Cheers

can i get some opinion of people's 2nd choice of pistons (apart from CP 9:1) for an rb25/30??

car will only run about 1bar of boost

im undecided but thinking about these Arias

p/n= AP332104

10.6cc dome top

21mm pin

1.280" compression height

Only stocked in 0.20 thou oversize (86.5mm).

COMPRESSION RATIO 9.2-9.4

I had no issues with Arias. Nice and quiet, did what they had to do.

Decent CR so you don't have to substitute with boost so great off boost response and can stick to a smaller turbo. Works for me.

And indeed the cat light did come on once for about 3 seconds at the top of a long hill last time I drove it - and before seeing Sydneykid's posts. Haven't dropped the pipe yet to have a look at the cat, does anyone know for sure if I should expect dead / highly degraded / clogged cat? Of course if it's obviously shagged I'll get a new one but I've never shagged a cat before (go on laugh) so not sure if the temporary overheat would be catastrophic, would prefer to avoid the cost of a new one.

And I've loaned a PFC, dyno on Wed morning to sort this out.

Cheers

so...

checked plugs, no signs of over being rich

PFC tune yielded

264 rwkw @ 7000 (up from peak 220 @ 6500)

10psi

AFRs below 12 on boost

Inj Duty 71

much nicer to drive - as crisp and responsive as normal. :)

now for the run in...

Edited by Scooby

Hi guys.. My car is auto and i'm wanting to see 500rwhp...

1. After talking to my turbo guy he has me in two minds as to which turbo to use. I was happy to use the Garrett GT35R with the 0.86 rear but after talking to him today he has said he would reccommend the 1.06 rear as it will suit my 5000rpm stall converter. What would you use ??

2. I have the RB30e series 2 block (with the turbo fittings) and a R34 GTR head (20,000km). I havent seen mentioned weather this head is different to the R32/33 GTR heads. I have no experience with the specs of these cars and all i can find is they run different cams/valves. Do i just treat the R34 head as if it was an earlier model when building the motor ???

3. Please forgive me as the last cam I replaced was a Holden 308. I would like the "lumpy" "angry" idle as heard on some GTR's, what cams would you suggest for the R34 head or would you just get adj camgears ?? Not really willing to rev past 7500rpm if i don't have to.

Thanks for your feedback :huh:

Cheers

Steve

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...