Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I thought it would be interesting to see what kind of economy all our cars are getting!

Next time you fill up at the pump, reset your "trip-o-meter" and then when you fill the tank up after that (all the way to the top) note how many K's you've done, and how many litres you just bought! The best way to compare between cars is litres per 100 kilometres, so to find out yours use this site - Metric Fuel Consumption Calculator

So for example, I traveled 159k's and used 28L of fuel, therefore my car's guzzling away at 17.61L/100k's eek! :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157835-whats-your-fuel-economy-like/
Share on other sites

haha well atm i used half a tank for 60kms lol (just been rebuilt with lots off goodies dropped it off for a tune today lol)
:)

Mine's about 18.26L/ 100km's. The idling in traffic & start up with the 740cc injectors is what kills me :) :)

Hmm... I'm a bit of an Excel junky. So I have a done some work on this. LOL

My averages over the past two months are:

14.12 - L/100Km

7.10 - Km/L

461.19 - Max Range (at current Km/L)

5.84 - Km/$

0.17 - Cents/Km

Also I average 234.92Km between fuel up's (once a week normaly)

and fill tank with an average of 31.90L.

The average cost of BP Ultamate 98 over the past two months has been $1.22per/L

:) LMAO!!

Edited by CleanGTS-t

I've got 3 reading's for ya

Open Road (country Drive) = 10.5L/100kms

City (grampaing) = 13.1L/100kms

City (thrashing) = 18.97L/100kms

all run on BP Ultimate, was heap's surprising cause I think it's runnin a bit rich too...

I get between 5.46 and 6.7km/L .... most I have ever had out of a tank is 400km - my orange light comes on at around 280km most of the time :D

I am going to change the O2 sensor shortly as well as some other mods - hopefully will improve the economy

I get between 5.46 and 6.7km/L .... most I have ever had out of a tank is 400km - my orange light comes on at around 280km most of the time :laugh:

I am going to change the O2 sensor shortly as well as some other mods - hopefully will improve the economy

Surprised you haven't changed the O2 by now Andrew. With the economy you're getting you'll save a fortune if you change the sensor, should pay for itself in a matter of weeks.

I normally check mine each time I fill up. I do between 300 - 400km a week usually. My driving is normally all suburban with lots of hard launches & acceleration (I just cant help myself :D). For that kind of driving I normally average between 11.7 to 12.2 Litres/100Km, 12.2 being if I've been using the airconditioning most if the time.

If I start doing any major highway/country stuff I can get it into the 10's easy & have seen 9's

Before doing my O2 sensor my economy had crept up to about 15 Litres/100km..

Edited by JazzaR33

If you want fuel ecconomy buy a bike, if you want a performance car dont worry about fuel ecconomy. The more power you make the more fuel you need.

I have never worked my ecconomy out, but I know its not that good (but I dont care). Just because a Skyline offers great performance at a budget price (we they do now, but not so much when I bought mine) will not make them an ecconomical car. If you can't afford the fuel (and tyres and maintenance) to drive it, dont buy any performance vehicle.

/end Rant LOL

:laugh:

I sold my old VS 5ltr 5speed because it used too much juice, I bought a turbo'd skyline so I could limp it around off boost the majority of the time and be decent on petrol. When I want to give it a hit I do and it uses the juice.

I remember when new from factory the R32 GTST's were supposed to return 10.5L/100km's and the R33's 10L/100km's. Obviously thats when they were new, on jap fuel and driving it lightly.

As long as mine continues to return over 400km's per 50litres I care less.

A mate runs 800cc sard twin sprays making 270rwkw with his rb30det and that still returns over 400km's to a tank so there's no reason why some should see less in my eyes.. Obviously if he gets stuck up it for long periods of time (which is near impossible not to mention damn dangerous with 270rwkw) it will suck the juice.

Thats my story/rant. LOL :P

r31 - rb20det, on a really empty fill i get nearly 50L in........for a 55L tank i dont let it go taht far (usually max 45L is an empty fill for me)

when it was auto id get 300km to a tank........mainly cos it would hang in 3rd at 60 and not go into overdrive

since manual, ive been gettin 400-450km per tank..........usually gets a good floggin on a weekend

Hi Guys,

I've been monitoring my economy for the past 18 months. Since my last tune in September 2006, I average 14.4L/100km. My best recorded was 13.3 and worst 15.7 to date.

This is ALL city driving.

I wouldn't expect much better than maybe 12.5 on a country run as the Microtech LT12 doesn't have closed loop and doesn't utilise the O2 sensor any more. With the Microtech, economy has to be tuned on the dyno.

It's much better now as prior to this tune, my worst was 18.8 and that was the fuel prices were through the roof!

Cheers, Mike

i get a bit over 350km and normally fill up 50-55lts

i figure that leaves 10-15lts in my tank

last week i think i got 400km ive been takin it real easy of late due to comming close to a clutch change

same.. but lol, I also got quarter tank fuel problems due to not caring enough during the installation of my fuel pump (not mounted low enuff)... So now on empty (1/4 tank) I'll get down there and mount it lower in the tank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...