Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R33 FOR THE WIN.....

32's are just an upgraded silvia and personally would rather have a silvia (no offence to 32 owners) and 34's except the gtr just dont have the tough look about them there just bit plain....

I guess the conclusion is R33, R34 then the R32... is this fair???

R33 the best? Nah . The R34 gtr in my opinion is the most shit hot sexiest beast on the road, it is the king by far all other skylines bow befor it . At last years Autosalon there was a grey r34 gtr close to the entrance of the show it has an awsome kit on it carbon bonnet lowered , the whole bit , some custom work on the interior but not overly done, it was just sheer perfection, it was by far the most mean looking shit hot car at the show. Just the thought of owning a beast like that gives me goose bumps.

But i drive an r33 gtst and i really love my car . It is really challenging to find the right look for the r33 it has nice lines and unlike the r32 and 34 the r33's looks vary right across the scale from completely dumb ass ugly whale to the sleek low street weapon. I guess thats the charm of the r33, not to mention it probably one of the best bang for buck cars out there.

But really if i had the cash, oooohh if i had the cash oh gee here come the goosbumps.

Hehe funny how the only people who are saying R33's look best is the people who own them, guess they gotta justify spending the money.

My preference:

(1) R32 < Best overall, guards are nice and chunky and front bar looks nice, rear is sweet looking

(2) R34 < I .. All wings and guards and lips and stuff, nothing seems to flare out much, have seen some nice GTT's that stand out but most GTR's sorta look alike. Front of most looks phat and the back especially rear lights is nice

(3) R33 < Nothing much to like about them.. See them far too much and the GTS-T's are fugly as (especially series 1.. omg..) Even the GTR resembles a magna VRX or a mid 90's model camry (you'd be surprised how often i get them mixed) They're far too heavy and irregardless of the RB25 the 33 gts-t is only JUST faster than the RB20 powered 32 gts-t which i find disturbing.

the 33 might only be a bit faster than the 32 flat out, but drive them in traffic and see which one you find to have more power accross the board.

Nicely put.....

I saw a R34 the other day, with REGO VTEKA or something... just wanna say, pretty nice.... most of all, he looked at my R33 and drooled... respect right there... dual respect to a Skyline enthusiast.

Oh ok, so it's just like the only people who like the 32s are the ones who own them?

I've seriously got no problems with any skyline - the 32 owners seem to keep jumping out at us, that's why I do it back.

In all honestly, all skylines can chirp second and that's all that matters. The End.

Hehe funny how the only people who are saying R33's look best is the people who own them, guess they gotta justify spending the money.

My preference:

(1) R32 < Best overall, guards are nice and chunky and front bar looks nice, rear is sweet looking

(2) R34 < I .. All wings and guards and lips and stuff, nothing seems to flare out much, have seen some nice GTT's that stand out but most GTR's sorta look alike. Front of most looks phat and the back especially rear lights is nice

(3) R33 < Nothing much to like about them.. See them far too much and the GTS-T's are fugly as (especially series 1.. omg..) Even the GTR resembles a magna VRX or a mid 90's model camry (you'd be surprised how often i get them mixed) They're far too heavy and irregardless of the RB25 the 33 gts-t is only JUST faster than the RB20 powered 32 gts-t which i find disturbing.

R33 SERIES 2 GTST hands down are the best in looks youve all seen that one that just makes you have to have a nother look R33S2 = Shit Hot

1. Kick Ass Head Lights

2. Kick Ass Lines

3. Kick Ass In General end of story.

I reckon the R34 looks the sexiest, followed by R33 then R32.

R31 = I just want a skyline, even though it is a pos

R32 = completely out of date, interior looks like a vn commodore. Its just plain and simply old.

R33 series 1 = ugly ass front (standard), especially when the headlights go yellow

R33 series 2 = I found it looks much better than the series 1, has awesome lights and meaner lines.

R34 = A little boxy but who cares! Love em

As for wow factor, i reckon that it no longer exists with skylines. Back in the day you would see a skyline and think "wow". Now you look at one and go, oh another skyline...

Edited by krzysiu
I reckon the R34 looks the sexiest, followed by R33 then R32.

R31 = I just want a skyline, even though it is a pos

R32 = completely out of date, interior looks like a vn commodore. Its just plain and simply old.

R33 series 1 = ugly ass front (standard), especially when the headlights go yellow

R33 series 2 = I found it looks much better than the series 1, has awesome lights and meaner lines.

R34 = A little boxy but who cares! Love em

As for wow factor, i reckon that it no longer exists with skylines. Back in the day you would see a skyline and think "wow". Now you look at one and go, oh another skyline...

i think the r33 interiors r just as ugly if not uglier then the r32's the sterring wheel of a r33 yukkkkkkkkkkkk atleast with the r32's we can put a momo one which would look good on it .... nothing beats r32 gtr's there light parts r cheap and u can turn em 4wd and 2wd ..... i dunt mind the r34 gtrs there hot as well but too expensive to maintain.. thumbs up for r32 GTRSSS!!! THE ORIGINAL KING ...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...