Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got back from a track day and im worried i have blown a shock :)

The car moves around a hell of a lot under brakes. It makes it hard to stop the car as the rear end moves around a hell of a lot making it a real handful.

Its nto a brake bias problem as my my brakes are fine and its not locking brakes. I cant really jump on them like usual without the rear end wanting to overtake me.

Alignment settings are:

Front: -3.4 deg camber , 0 toe and 5.7 deg castor

Rear: -1.00 deg camber, total toe 2mm

I have big swaybars which are on the hardest setting which is another concern i have.

So to make sure i dont have enough on my mind while punting it is that at high speed the car walks all over the road. It generally takes small steering corrections to keep the thing tracking straight. Really disconcerning when you are doing 240km/h :P

I have replaced the front upper control arms with aftermarket ones thinking that the bushes were dead and responsible for the knocking and front end wander. The new arms have fixed the knocking but not the wander.

So, anyone ... help ! Right now i need more susp to make the most of the engine power and tyre grip i have

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey roy Are your castor bushes in good condition?

I have found a similar situation at much lower speeds. under hard braking in a straight line going from 140 to 60 in a short distance the rear end squirms around. and am about to replace the castor arms with adjustable ones that use spherical bearings. I know a lot of people say don't use them on road cars but i have decided to give them a go.

Why so little castor? Stock specs are 6.5 +/- 0.75deg. Increasing castor a lot could solve your front wondering around problem.

Something seems a bit weird if you've got the upper arms set short enough to get 3.4deg camber and you've still dont have much castor.

When I've gone from 1.5deg camber to 3deg, I've found I usually gain another degree of castor.

With the twitchy rear on braking, maybe try a bit more toe in?

Edited by salad

Swaybars don't do much under brakes unless your turning and braking.

You didn't overdo it on the ripplestrips did you?

I assume you checked the basics? (wheel nuts etc)

Edited by dontfeelcold

Thats all the castor i can get out of the Whiteline bushes. Im looking at getting some cusco castor arms in the next week or so.

Its also back to the drawing board...the money that was going on the new motor now needs to be diverted to suspension as it was fun but a handful at PI. ..could so be so much quicker if i could balance the car out better, especially under brakes

Swaybars don't do much under brakes unless your turning and braking.

You didn't overdo it on the ripplestrips did you?

I assume you checked the basics? (wheel nuts etc)

What do you mean by overdoing the ripple strips...im trying to pull the car up in a straight line...most difficult coming up to Honda where i was lifting off early through Southern Loop as the car just didnt have the control to pull it up while getting back to the left hand side for Honda. And then into MG where the car was just wagging its tail.

Also a friend following me can confirm the car is crabbing in the rear end on the high speed stuff...and it looks like its wanting to lift its inside rear tyre...so to me it sounds like the bars are too big for the rest of the suspension setup and weight of the car

So is the arse of the car becoming light under brakes?? or is it just moving around under brakes??

If the car is crabbing then thats going to be the first place you start to look at. Sway bars etc are obviously not going to make it crab and a crabbing vehicle is always un-easy when pulling up.

If its trying to lift the inside rear stiffen up the front bar if possible and see if it helps level the car back out.

The allignment looks okay all bar the castor, Its way to low. Has the thing had a front ender at some stage?? as someone pointed out its actually less than the factory settings.

What do you mean by overdoing the ripple strips...im trying to pull the car up in a straight line...most difficult coming up to Honda where i was lifting off early through Southern Loop as the car just didnt have the control to pull it up while getting back to the left hand side for Honda. And then into MG where the car was just wagging its tail.

Also a friend following me can confirm the car is crabbing in the rear end on the high speed stuff...and it looks like its wanting to lift its inside rear tyre...so to me it sounds like the bars are too big for the rest of the suspension setup and weight of the car

I mean if you drove on ripples strips to much it might have damaged something. Not sure how bad they are at PI but just a thought.

LOL...now i get you. Yeh, they are there to be used and i use them :P

The car has never had a front ender. I just checked the alignment sheet again and its actually 5.7 deg.

I dont feel there is excessive weight transfer under brakes, the car is just unsettled. Ill try and edit the vid and show what the car is doing.

I get the feeling that the 90,000km/ 6 yr old Bilsteins have had their day. They have served me well and have probably done over 3,000kms of track work

get them on a shock dyno, that will eliminate that soon enough, and worst comes to worst you can rebuild them for around 100 each.

How are your rear subframe bushes? my cefiro under hard braking used to walk all over the place and it turned out to be all 4 subframe bushes had perished and crumbled away... making the whole rear move around a lot. ended up fitting alloy spacer/bushes and that solved that

With the exception of the swaybars and upper control arms, and the front springs which are all a bit newer, the shocks, bushes etc were all replaced 90,000kms/6 yrs ago.

The car gets a good once over every wheel alignment but thats not to say that the cradle bushes arent dead. Ill add that to the list of things to check

As for getting the Bilsteins rebuilt. They are a good thing when you look at the dollars and served me well, but i find with semis on the car that they dont make the car feel as nice as it does when its on streets. A few other ppls cars with different brands feel much better so im back to where i was 12 months ago with needing to get it all checked out then maybe new shocks and springs :(

Why so little castor? Stock specs are 6.5 +/- 0.75deg. Increasing castor a lot could solve your front wondering around problem.

Something seems a bit weird if you've got the upper arms set short enough to get 3.4deg camber and you've still dont have much castor.

When I've gone from 1.5deg camber to 3deg, I've found I usually gain another degree of castor.

With the twitchy rear on braking, maybe try a bit more toe in?

i've actually found it the opposite on my skylines. the more castor I have the less static camber i get and vice versa. I think as the rod is pulling the assembly forward it's reducing the static neg camber. since the upper arm and the castor rod are both pulling against each other to a degree there is a limit to how much you can get out of each one.

Thats what im hoping, but i think it could also be a dead shock.

The rod end boots are torn front & rear but there doesnt seem to be any play. Problem is its almost $600 from Nissan for replacements. There has to be a cheaper solution going around?

I know mine has a bit of wear in the rack, and I get a similar wander even with gentle driving around town.

A dead shock should be pretty simple to diagnose with a "bounce test".

Well the way the car got unweighted coming onto the striaght tells me that a shock may be dead. And the way the car moves around under brakes tells me a shock may be dead. It really bucked over the undulations. I just hope its not shocks...dont want to spend big money on shocks :(

i've actually found it the opposite on my skylines. the more castor I have the less static camber i get and vice versa. I think as the rod is pulling the assembly forward it's reducing the static neg camber. since the upper arm and the castor rod are both pulling against each other to a degree there is a limit to how much you can get out of each one.

Hmm, interesting. When I wheel aligned my car Friday night, I set camber to 3.1 or so and then when I finished (after castor adjustment) it actually increased static camber to 3.25. Thinking about it a bit more pulling the LCA foward makes it a bit more parallel to the upper arm (as it's on a ~30deg angle facing backwards) and effectively makes it longer. This is just me thinking about aloud at the moment though...

Because of the angle of the upper arm, when you shorten it, it pulls the top of the upright towards the back of the car, so you increase castor by a fair bit aswell as camber.

Well this has been my experience anyway and me thinking about it a bit more makes a bit of sense to me, so good enough for me :D

Edited by salad

Hi Roy, I can whip the Bilsteins on the dyno if you want, just let me know. We have the specs of brand new (out of the box) Bilsteins to compare to. I can also arrange for them to be revalved to more suite the uses that you put them to. You know the problem, you are going to have to pay 10 times as much to get anything better.

Is that rear toe out or toe in 2mm? If toe out then that is definitely a problem, if toe in then I would suggest increasing to the recommended 2mm each side.

:) cheers :)

Is that rear toe out or toe in 2mm? If toe out then that is definitely a problem, if toe in then I would suggest increasing to the recommended 2mm each side.

The million dollar question. Is toe in positive or negative?

I have spoken to Quadrant down here about revalving and adjustable spring seats with some higher spring rates.

Im hoping that with higher spring rates then they can help control the roll of the car and that the swaybars will be less likley to unweight the inside tyre. It was really pronounced at PI. Im hoping to get my hands on some good jap stuff....if they fall through i may just get the Bilsteins rebuilt. Dont care about streetability anymore. Just want to tie the car down so its actually quick...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...