Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, curious to see how this works out considering the cheap price!

my father owns a race car shop in sydney and we have modified a few plenums before, eg: rb30 rb25 and made custom ones to.

on a rb25 race car, the customer was after the xf throttle body on the front of the plenum. we separated the 2halves and made an aluminium top for it and machined up a block to suit the xf throttle body, all in all, we made runners to weld inside the custom top section! lots of stuffing around to get flow as even as possible, and lots of time and calculations involved! huge job.

although customer was happy in the end as it bolted straight up and we just moved a couple of vacuum hoses around, lost 70cm of cooler piping, and increased curve/less lag on the dyno, by about 10%. so it came on boost a little quicker!

cant wait to see the results, as im sure with some tidying up, and a little tlc (match porting) with a die grinder, could get these (cheap) plenums flowing just as good as the (genuine) ones! if your not scraed to cut it open and weld in a couple of air flow dividers, i honestly believe it will work alot better than the greddy units!

best of luck with this little project, and if you require any help, feel free to pm mate! thanks all, look forward to seeing the results!

cheers, Garth

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well yes i have got a few updates the plenum itself looked pretty ordinary on the outside the inside wasnt too bad at all the runners themselves well looked not too bad although there was a big long piece of aluminium slag on the inside of the plenum uptowards the rear of it which i have recently cut out and have cleaned the inside of the runners with the little burr remover brush thing you use with the die grinder, I have also recieved the q45 throttle body aswell for a very very decent price of 245 delivered from the US and this itself was in remarkable condition, At the moment what is really stalling me is Damn bills, which arent too much of a hassel but trying to find a Flow bench Just and i say this JUST to measure consitancy of airflow through each runner up here in SE QLD, this will give me a better indication of use whether or not to go forth or just say to hell with it go the Original Greddy As seems to be that the problem lies usually in runner design of these plenums Hence lean cyls.

One big notice on these is the lack of available sized Vaccum fittings for the various and numerous hoses, Not really the lack but mainly finding the right sized ones as i have found the holes not to be the best of size, so some work still needs to go into this ie Tap and Die.

The water holes werent in the best of shape with alot of slag bits well everywhere so have also cleaned these up extensively with the die grinder, And to finish it off i would still recommend the head face of the plenum to be milled so its straight, not saying it isnt but you cant be too sure.

So far not much else to say apart from the q45 bolts straight to it no adapter required for them, injectors and fuel rail areas look good.

Not only i have cams coming soon so will go forth with that before this project as i still need a place where i can get better diagnostics on this manifold, At this stage, would still have to confirm id go with Nismo, hypertune, and original greddy plenums as these designs usually come with most bits well greddy ones do, esp the vaccum fittings and bolts which at importing prices at the moment would be your far better option as you wouldnt have to go through the pain of the work, But to close out this matter i would rather need confirmation of runner flow % differences to be utmost happy.

Hope that helps

I have got to ask, Am i wrong in saying it is possible JUST to flow test the manifold without the head? It has to be!... Plus those qld people help me out with flow bench testing for manifolds up ere for me, Im Having damn trouble trying to find one.

I'm doing the same thing for my RB30, I got my plenum today and it was what I was expecting for $250 delivered. I took to a few of the ports with a dremel and they came up beautiful, the only thing I'm worried about it not being able to reach into the back of the plenum to clean it up a bit more. I'm getting the face machined flat because it will definitely leak if I put it on as is.

Some pics -

post-28866-1178004879.jpg

post-28866-1178004932.jpg

post-28866-1178004961.jpg

I'm doing the same thing for my RB30, I got my plenum today and it was what I was expecting for $250 delivered. I took to a few of the ports with a dremel and they came up beautiful, the only thing I'm worried about it not being able to reach into the back of the plenum to clean it up a bit more. I'm getting the face machined flat because it will definitely leak if I put it on as is.

Some pics -

I havnt had a look at one of these but boy they must be darn rough to be any worse than the so called real thing. I am disgusted at the casting quality on mine.

its such an integral part, it would be like using fake chinese injectors

do you really want to risk it ?

I wouldn't really class it as the same risk as using crappy injectors. It's the exact same dimensions as an original Greddy plenum, its only the casting quality that differs. If they went to the effort of sticking them in a CNC machine and cleaning them up I'm sure they'd be worth another $500 at least... but they don't so thats where the dremel comes in. The manifold isn't under a lot of thermal stress like the exhaust side either. To me, the risk is acceptable.

Pics of an original would be awesome, I'd hope they'd be a fair bit better than a copy.

oh please noel post pics of inside and close ups of your Original greddy plenum :)

Get off your lazy arse and come have a looksee Adam. Heck you drive down the coast for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

Heres a good excuse for ya. :)

just to throw it into the mix - even though it is the RB26 original Greddy plenum:

Garage Saurus have cut axially in the direction of the runners and inserted diversion plates along the plenum (i.e. perpendicular to flow of air into the plenum), I assume to redistribute the flow to the cylinders. Do people think this will be necessary in this instance - there must have been a difference in cylinder flow, or else why do it?

I was almost goin to buy one of these and then i heard the bad rap. I got a custom made one for a price i couldnt say no to and told if anything goes wrong (like the weld cracking etc) to take it back and they'll fix it up for me. It also has velocity stacks inside.

Do the greddy and copy greddy ones have the velocity stacks?

post-28112-1178087729.jpg

The water holes werent in the best of shape with alot of slag bits well everywhere so have also cleaned these up extensively with the die grinder

I'd advise pressure testing these as well as I've heard horror stories of them cracking and hydrolocking the motor.

The problem most often stated is uneven distribution of air to the cylinders.

I've heard of really keen workshops having a special exhaust manifold with 6 widebands to test the afr of each indivdual cylinder to check things like this. I guess it'd be a pretty expensive way to test though.

I'll quote from a mag

Its all too easy to look at an inlet manifold and figure that its primary function is one of flow. Getting air into an engine is part of it, but to simplify the operation of an inlet manifold in such a crude way is to understand only a fraction of what it is designed to achieve.

Rather, the inlet manifold on any late-model fuel injected engine is actually a tuned chamber designed to take advantage of a phenomenon known as the Hermoltz frequency. If u could actually see inside the inlet manifold, you'd be able to note that the air doesn't simply rush into the cylinder head, it instead pulses back and forth in unison with the opening and closing of the valves, forming a big column of vibrating air.

Optimising the vibration of the air to get the very best cylinder fill possible is one thing engineers chase more than any other. This is what makes power, gives excellent economy and the sharp throttle response expected of a modern car. Its also something undone by those oblivious to the hours of manifold testing performed at the factory.

So what i reckon that means is spend money on something that is designed and tested.... Not something that looks the goods from the outside.. and a rough job at that.

I'll quote from a mag

Its all too easy to look at an inlet manifold and figure that its primary function is one of flow. Getting air into an engine is part of it, but to simplify the operation of an inlet manifold in such a crude way is to understand only a fraction of what it is designed to achieve.

Rather, the inlet manifold on any late-model fuel injected engine is actually a tuned chamber designed to take advantage of a phenomenon known as the Hermoltz frequency. If u could actually see inside the inlet manifold, you'd be able to note that the air doesn't simply rush into the cylinder head, it instead pulses back and forth in unison with the opening and closing of the valves, forming a big column of vibrating air.

Optimising the vibration of the air to get the very best cylinder fill possible is one thing engineers chase more than any other. This is what makes power, gives excellent economy and the sharp throttle response expected of a modern car. Its also something undone by those oblivious to the hours of manifold testing performed at the factory.

So what i reckon that means is spend money on something that is designed and tested.... Not something that looks the goods from the outside.. and a rough job at that.

So you're wishing you didn't spend your money a huge ass bling camber :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...