Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

YEA IT IS THE PETERSON 4 STAGE DRY SUMP SYSTEM AND HAS FOUR OIL FILTERS UNDER THE SUMP WHICH NOW ONLY SITS ABOUT AN INCH DEEP.....

REMEMBER TO VOTE FOR MY CAR IN THE LATEST FASTFOURS MAG SEND THE TEXT TO 19711777 SAY CAR NUM 3 AND ALSO PUT YOUR NAME ADDRESS AND Y I SHOULD WIN THE BEST TEX GET A TRIP FOR TWO TO SYD TO SOME BIG THING....

THANKS GUYS I WILL LET YOU NO WHEN THE GIRL HITS THE TRACK.......

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very nice car. I have seen it numerous times at Willowbank and always puts on a good show.

What is your best time and mph BTW? And with Nitrous or no nitrous? Regardless, quality car and good on you for sticking with the 2.5L :cheers:

that is an awesome car dude, and a huge achievment

well done, can't wait to see it hit the track, bound to do some good times with a good set of slicks and that trusty old glide

as to the dude with the commo comments, very interested to see what he has that he'd confidently line up against a 900hp car lol

  • 1 month later...

not putting down this car at all but ive seen it at willowbank a few times and i think all but once everytime ive seen it on the strip it had to get pushed back off. Last few times ive seen it at willowbank it didnt even make its way to the strip at all. Obviously its made more than 1 run but it would of been good to see it racing more rather than just sitting around looking good.

Is it just me, or is the dyno sheet not loading?

Nice list of mods, and the engine looks clean, but anyone can polish an engine and spend copious amounts on parts. It's getting them all to work in the right order and the right pressures, that's the hard part.

I'll believe your 900hp claim it when I see it.

Edited by phee

Reliable or not this thread was started on the 11 April and still no dyno sheet?

I am not saying it isn't possible but it is now the 20th May and nothing...

Anyone can polish an engine and buy a shit load of parts but putting them in a working and usable application is another issue.

900hp is from the engine, so we are talking around 720rwhp given the 20% (average) difference?

Morgs - What's the MPH on DRAGME?

Edited by phee
The 900hp claim was done on an engine dyno this info came from a reliable sorce. Only thing i can say is the second wastegate merge pipes are so so ugly...

An old sau member in SA had his RB25 running 26 internals push out 580hp on an engine dyno. Once in the car and on a DD Dyno it only made 338rwkw. :S

~95rwkw drivetrain loss.

im not suprised a RB25 can make this sort of power at all. Why not ? a 1J can.

Well done. definatly many hours of work and i dont even want to think about how much $$ went into that setup. Speed flow galore :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...