Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

These babies have been around for ages and are now extinct, except for the 2nd hand ones floating around which I've grabed and installed.

....It seems that nearly everyone has got over excited and posted results on the standard injectors/AFM stage and hit around the 230-240's on about 1bar/14psi....but then if they went any further, forgot to put those results up?

I've been searching for ages and can't find anyone with a solid 17psi dyno with some decent injectors/fuel pump/AFM and the usual supporting mods.

Is there anyone?

Post em up peeps!

I'll be going the 17psi in a month or too and will post it up.

Just itchin to know how people went in the meantime.

Thanks.

Birnie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165596-want-some-solid-hks-2535-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I scored 240 @ 17-18psi but running really, really, rich. (stock ecu with central 20 chip)

gtr fuel pump, stock injectors, adjustable fuel reg n other supporting mods

Waiting to get the power fc tuned, and i will keep u updated

2535? best thing in my life :):(

edit: rb25 :)

Edited by DjeMz
I scored 240 @ 17-18psi but running really, really, rich. (stock ecu with central 20 chip)

gtr fuel pump, stock injectors, adjustable fuel reg n other supporting mods

Waiting to get the power fc tuned, and i will keep u updated

2535? best thing in my life :):(

edit: rb25 :)

Now we're talking!

Geting some good results coming thru, keep em coming..... :)

DjeMz - What are you doin man!

Get an ECU and see your car come ALIVE !

cln, rob told me no one ever believed it and he did it a number of times to shut people up..

Justin911 is now using that turbo.

And no it wasnt 25psi thru the turbo.

DjeMz: Robs tuning wont disapoint you :)

djemz: rob from creatd is confident 2530s and 2535s are good for 250 and upwards.

with a 2530 he made 255 on his drift 33

Happy dyno??

Worth a review of published data from Garrett. Considering the GT28RS (aka Discopotato) with flow maps and a compressor spec near-as identical to the 2530 is rated to 320 CRANK hp, the claim seems a bit high.

Still, if that's what he got, and it's backed up by times down a strip or round a circuit, then who cares? Great result if that's what he got.

nope not a happy dyno at all, rob doesnt mock up his figures :)

He used it for drift and used to tear up 3rd gear like you wouldnt believe.

Its a HKS turbo, HKS turbos flow better and are better than the hks turbo, said by many many tuners i have spoken to.

:)

Has these figures been backed up on another dyno? Did Justin run his car at the SAU - RE Customs Dyno Day, if so what did he get?

260rwkw on a gt2535 is optermistic and claiming anything higher is just BS.

Should convince Justin to come to a SAU dyno day :(

320hp = 246.4kw at the crank @ 1bar

drive-line losses is about 30-40kw. Running 17-18psi may give you an extra 30-40rwkw, but remember this is a smallish turbo, thus will not make much more power at higher boost levels above 18psi.

was reading a old hks book the other day noticed that hks's 320 p/s power fig for 2530 is running them on only 1 bar

as was p/s ratings for 2535,2540 etc

so at 1+bar they will make more grunt period

remember HKS turbo's are manufactured to be most efficent at 1-1.5 bar

:santa:

Has these figures been backed up on another dyno? Did Justin run his car at the SAU - RE Customs Dyno Day, if so what did he get?

260rwkw on a gt2535 is optermistic and claiming anything higher is just BS.

Should convince Justin to come to a SAU dyno day :thumbsup:

320hp = 246.4kw at the crank @ 1bar

drive-line losses is about 30-40kw. Running 17-18psi may give you an extra 30-40rwkw, but remember this is a smallish turbo, thus will not make much more power at higher boost levels above 18psi.

I did the same before but assumed I was wrong Al.

340hp @1bar is on close to the edge of its efficency. Bump up the boost wont yeild massive HP gains...just some more torque.

~250 seems possible on 18psi as suugested. His drift car must be running more boost and have some decent internals.

Eitehr way its gonna be a good result from the upgrade.

past 240rwkw i dont think you will make any more power

every extra psi you dial in just induces more detonation and bugger all power per psi past 1 bar

the compressor probably cant supply any more useful past 1 bar of compressor speed

then how do people make 290 - 300 kw with a gtrs so iv read on this forum?

They don't. Dyno read outs don't mean shit unless you run all the cars on the same dyno, on the same day.

I have a HKS GTRS, with extensive head porting and Tomei cams. Boost was set to 18psi, but b4 peak power it dropped down to 16psi and made 268rwkw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...