Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i recently read a post on this forum where a member was stating that his PSI level had rose from 7psi to 9psi just by installing a FMIC ..

how exactly does this occur when the stock ECU still has a boost soleniod setting of 5psi low and 7psi high

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166768-fmic-increases-psi/
Share on other sites

The factory smic is restrictive, thus if you where to measure the boost b4 the smic it will be higher than the boost after the smic. Installing a better flowing cooler will have less restictions, therefor the boost b4 and after the cooler will almost be the same.

The factory solenoid is similar to a bleed valve, as is calculated/manufactured to allow the turbo to boost up to 9psi. This is with the restictive smic, replace with a fmic will reduce restriction, therefor flow more air.

based on my experience with silvias the factory cores have on average a pressure drop of about 2-3psi an aftermarket one has on average less than that and the average differrence in pressure drop is realised as a boost increased.

this also depends on where the actuator gets it signal from

on the r32 it comes off the compressor cover so it wouldnt be an issue on the 32

but the r33 gets it post intercooler so its after intercooler core drop

based on my experience with silvias the factory cores have on average a pressure drop of about 2-3psi an aftermarket one has on average less than that and the average differrence in pressure drop is realised as a boost increased.

Pressure differentials across intercooler cores is based on airflow more so than boost pressure. Its just that higher boost pressure usually means more airflow. So your figures are a little ambiguous.

Pressure differentials across intercooler cores is based on airflow more so than boost pressure. Its just that higher boost pressure usually means more airflow. So your figures are a little ambiguous.

if an intercooler is a restriction then the pressure will be higher before the cooler than after. the more of a restriction the higher the difference.

it's interesting, because we all not that standard boost for an RB20 is 10psi, and standard boost for an RB25 is 5/7psi... but they're measure from different locations...

but if we were to measure them from the same place we might get similar figures. Just thinking out loud.

it's interesting, because we all not that standard boost for an RB20 is 10psi, and standard boost for an RB25 is 5/7psi... but they're measure from different locations...

but if we were to measure them from the same place we might get similar figures. Just thinking out loud.

You won't as the r32 actuator is rated to open at a higher pressure.

Grab an r33 actuator and r32 actuator; the r32 actuator is considerably stiffer.

You shouldn't really get a pressure increase at all!

The same pressure is hitting the solenoid, at 7PSi before or after the intercooler change.

Alot of people actually notice a pressure DROP (If pressyre taken before intercooler) due to a more affective cooling intercooler (Pressure is dependant on temperature too!)

And if the actuator gets it's pressure from AFTER the intercooler, there should be ZERO change in pressure.

If the actuator is set to open at 7PSI with x amount of air bled off, then it will open at 7PSi after some air is bled off.

You won't as the r32 actuator is rated to open at a higher pressure.

Grab an r33 actuator and r32 actuator; the r32 actuator is considerably stiffer.

I was just wondering to myself, if Nissan would have compensated the pressure drop into the adjustment of their actuators, but then I wondered where WE are measuring boost from, so that probably comes into play. But hey like you said the r32 actuator is stiffer anyway so there you go... (still thinking out loud)

this also depends on where the actuator gets it signal from

on the r32 it comes off the compressor cover so it wouldnt be an issue on the 32

but the r33 gets it post intercooler so its after intercooler core drop

LOL...ah, now you agree with me. I remember you thinking i was on drugs when i was commenting why R32s make more boost at the inlet after a fmixc install :(

hmmm....fmic = MUST more driveable car with more consistent results. cold nights also make a BIGG differnece where as before was always crap by comparison. split front / dump 4psi increase with stock controller..... *yeS*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't like "actual computers" for in car use. They take time to boot up, have OS annoyances, and so on. Arduinos etc are ready to go a few seconds after power on, don't mind being agressively powere cycled, because everything is non-volatile, don't mind being shaken and stirred.
    • As Fred would tell us, it's all about interpreting the rules. It's not a water sprayer, it's a water mister... But everything else you've said, 100%! Even a raspberry Pi would be great, use HDMI out for a display, and add a raspberry Pi CANBus hat to read values out from the ECU.
    • Being a race car, and being in the era of the Arduino, one would think it would take little effort to build a controller to do the spraying based on a real physical measurment. Waaaaay back in the dim dark AS days, JE "designed" (as in, he had help) a microcontroller based intercooler spray system. It watched the difference between a temp sensor stuck on the core and one in the free air in front of the cooler, and if the temperature difference exceeded a (settable) threshold, it would activate the sprays. Thus, it only ran water when there was an actual need for water. If you stop to think about the actual physical things that are going on in that stack of coolers, there's probably at least a couple of triggering conditions one could come up with, and one could probably even run one pump with more than one solenoid valve, to allow water to be placed where it is needed, or at all points at once (if it is needed at all points). We're in the age of science baby. But.... I suspect that intercooler water sprays are on the forbidden list in most circuit classes, no? So only good for Targa type stuff?
    • I'll just leave this with, holy shit, those cars at work are awesome, and this will look wicked!
    • Could you modify this duct so instead it pushes the extra air through the radiator too and not down and out? For temps, I know it's not the greatest idea, but as a bit of a last resort, you could use a very intermittent misting spray onto the front of the coolers/rad. You don't want to be soaking them such that water is dripping off, but a small most on/off so that the water evaporates. That point of it constantly evaporating, rather than being soaked in water, will pull a LOT of heat out of the cooler. I'm literally thinking just the little mist sprayers for a garden from Bunnings. Being in a low humidity climate it will help even more! The other trick if you want to be ghetto is some shade cloth hung in the opening, and keep it wet. Pretty much now it's acting like an evap cooler on a house, but cooling the air you need to use to cool the radiator...   On a topic to think about too though, when air enters through the bumper, is it all nicely ducted from the edges of that opening back at a nice angle, or is it like most cars, and the edge of the opening just stops, and suddenly it's wayyy wider behind that? If it does the later, get it shrouded out at nice angles. When that opening changes too rapidly, it can actually cause a high pressure zone between the front bar and radiator, and limit air flow into that area, which means less air for cooling, as it effectively stalls the air, AND adds to drag...
×
×
  • Create New...