Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After 3 years of owning my R33 and having it stock standard besides a turbo back exhaust ive decided to do some slight modifications and after reading all the informative information through the years have come up with this list.

My parts list so far

R34 SMIC

SAFC 2

R33 GTR fuel pump

Exedy organic clutch

The judge is still out on the boost control option im stuck between a R32 wastegate actuator or EBC. If I go the actuator would the care still go good even though its going to be 5psi on low rpms then 10psi on higher pms??? I dont really want to slice and dice the electronics of the car to take off the two stage system. So any opnions would be appreciated. Also anything else you guys suggest I should do also.

Thanks

sounds good mate. are you still running the stock turbo? if you are run a maximum of 11 psi and you will notice the difference :( and i would run a good electronic boost controller so it dosent spike.

good luck :D

Edited by R33GOD

to run the 32 actuator all you do is replace the 33 one with the 32, they are a straight swap (exactly the same except for the set spring pressure) and then all you do is bypass your boost solenoid.

to do this you disconnect the vaccum lines from the boost controller and consettina pipe that goes to the turbo and run just 1 vaccum line from the intercooler nipple to the actuator and done, your now running 10psi.

Quick hint tho: get an aftermarket boost gauge installed before you put the actuator in. this will allow a more accurate reading of the boost your running. some r32 actuators have had their springs changed for 15psi or 13psi, and the standard 33 turbo cant run that. Some other sau forum mebers have experienced this, and spikes of 15psi from a changed spring are common so do that first

As Uras said it wont require any ecu modifications. And since you are going to tune the car with a safc 2 it will be perfectly fine and will make full use of the extra boost through the rev range.

Edited by fEkuaR

Nice choice. Nice to see you've done some reading. I'd hit up the 32 actuator (runs as much boost as you'd want to on the stock turbo). don't worry about low boost high boost etc. Just control boost with your foot.

I'd just remove that 2 stage bleeder thing. If the 32 actuator doesn't run enough boost, put in a proper bleeder.

32 actuator - cheap yet effective

just get yourself a propper cooler kit

good choice with fuel pump and ecu

with boost control a HKS actuator for $180 or so from SlidingPerformance will be good boost control

ill correct you :P its good for anything from 6 to 17 psi so far ive tried it, had it on 6 for testing then cranked it to 17 then settled with 13 as i wanted it there :)

I vote, replace with the R32 actuator, AND keep the solenoid.

10psi low revs and 12psi above 4500..

Seriously, that'd be awesome!

Might be fuel cut issues though on standard ECU but it's worth a think

Boost controllers....

For low boost (say 12 and under) i'd save the cash and get a bleeder. You can have my Turbosmart one for some small $$ and holds boost well enough.

Fluctuates 1 psi across the range but really, does it matter? Noooo.

So don't underestimate the bleeder. They work and are popular because they do work....and they're cheap.

If you're replacing the clutch, only do it cause you have to, as in worn out.

You won't need a super good one until heading over 200rwkws, so if the old one is OK, don't worry about it.

I had 195 rwkws on a 3yr old standard clutch and have never had a problem.

Probably older than 3 yrs old, it's the same clutch it had since the car was imported. Still going strong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...