Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys - got a problem to report - wondering if anyone can help out.

Last night me thinks - it's cold, 0.9 bar is going to be waaay safe so I dial it in and plant it in fourth. At this point a few things happened - which have happened before:

first boost comes up - ok, all good

then suddenly everything cuts completely for about half a sec - felt like I'd turned the key off!

then it cuts back in...

then it misfires around 5000rpm - which I'm guessing is the plugs and I'm hopefully going to fix that problem today...

the first problem of the engine/revs cut I'm thinking is the AFM going past it's voltage limit and shutting down.. does this sound right? what can I do to fix it? I've sprayed/cleaned it with heaps and heaps of electrical cleaner which didn't seem to make much difference..

Any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17194-afm-problems-i-think/
Share on other sites

Caminperth,

I had the same thing happen to me when I had my car at about 13psi while mucking around. It was fine on the dyno but as soon as it was on the road it would start to have the problem you described.

The guy told me that it would be even worse on a colder day due to the fact that there was too much air getting into the engine and the air/fuel ratios where not adjusting correctly on my stock ecu.

A SAFC would probably fix your problem, I have a simple Pivot air/fuel meter (1 universal setting) and adjusted it to make it a little bit leaner and it has fixed the problem for me.

I am no mechanic/tuner so it is just a suggestion ;)

Daniel

aidwin - as you said man - it's not the speed cut..

b005t - yea - i know what the speed cut is like and this ain't it. :rolleyes: and yea - am still running stock cooler...

adrian - could be - but it's fully intermitent..

bam - i wish i could afford the gtr!

daniel - i've got an afc and itc (old skool apexi fuel and ignition controllers) and that should sort out the fuel issuses at higher boost...

i fixed up the plug issue today - tho can't really try it out in this weather.. :)

still at a loss as to what it could be.. still got an inkling it's the airflow meter maxing out... will do it more when there's cold weather due to more air due to the density change... sound right?

Cam,

It's the boost cut/fuel cut. The boost controller has nothing to do with it, it's the AFM that tells the computer when it senses too much air flowing, which means too much boost, and it will hit boost cut, resulting in a nasty sudden halt to the car:D

You'll need to replace your ECU or get a fuel cut defender to stop this happening. It is worsened by the fact you have a stock cooler, and cold air is denser, thereby the AFM senses more air flowing:D

Hope that made sense (and is true)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...