Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm just about to do my first service on my R32 GTST since it arrived from japan.

The only engine mods it has is a full apexi exhaust.

It still has the factory airbox with a nonbrand name filter inside.

As an apexi filter to go within the factory box is around $80,

i thought i may as well buy an Apexi Pod filter that bolts directly onto the AFM for an extra twenty bucks.

The car has factory computer i dont think its had any tuning done.

It runs superb, so I didnt want to f**k anything up by adding the pod filter.

I'm just asking for peoples thoughts comments or suggestions.

Wether Its better i stick to the factory air box, or chuck this pod filter on?

And if any tuning needs to be done once the pod filter is on there?

Cheers

exhaust + filter are very minor mods, I think a remap would be an expensive way to gain a couple of kw.

box the pod if you want good performance, otherwise you'll suck in hot air. otherwise stick to the airbox.

the stock ecu can't be tuned without remapping it. if you take it to any random workshop with a dyno and ask them to tune it, there is about a 90% chance all they will do is a power run, and just have a look at the afr's. they probably won't even pop the bonnet.

Hmmm, my R32 GTSt was stock when I got it, I added a dump pipe back 3" exhaust and it went really well. I added a K&N pod with heat shied and it started hesitating when the car came on boost, like I was hitting a fuel/boost cut or something? I've since changed it back to the stok airbox and reset the ECU and it goes better than with the pod.

any tips when making an airbox to fit around the apexi pod?

Materials , dimensions, or anything to take note of?

Cheers

This is what i made up in 1 afternoon

post-28112-1181447982_thumb.jpg

post-28112-1181448136_thumb.jpg

post-28112-1181448157_thumb.jpg

Bellmouth attached to a 3" 90 degree bend

post-28112-1181448169_thumb.jpg

post-28112-1181448037_thumb.jpg

Half round heat sheild and bracket from super cheap

post-28112-1181448196_thumb.jpg

post-28112-1181448350_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...