Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

theres a lot of misleading information in this thread, im trying to find an article i read on a tech site a while ago so you can find out the best option between LCD and Plasma...

EDIT: found :), hope this helps in your descision link

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You are better off with a plasma, or an expensive LCD..

LCD is not that good (blacks, contrast, oversharp, overbright, smearing), but getting better. Often LCD is fine for gaming, but for tv, movies and things not as good. Australians are obsessed with LCD, but in the rest of the world, its much more even between plasma and LCD.

as mentioned there is a lot of misinformation in this thread... most of this bs about blacks not being black enough and plasmas burning in on the screen was old tech from about 5 years ago. You will find that most of the issues and differences between the 2 have been resolved or improved to the point where it comes down to personal preference. Even that link provided with the CNET article is a lot older then the date given leads you to believe... i read that over a year ago and once again a lot of stuff has changed.

LCD uses less power... Plasma screens are generally somewhat heavier the LCDs... LCDs also have a higher native resolution then Plasmas... but to the point where it isnt really noticable. You tend to hear a lot of mention of LCDs being blury when it comes to action shots etc... once again this was mainly with the older and or cheaper LCDs. LCDs are susceptable to "dead pixels" which Plasmas are not.

Obviously Plasmas are available in a larger size range however they will all pail in signifigance once Laser TV is released... providing it is still under development.

Also dont fall into the trap of "this TV uses the same LCD screen as the "enter name brand" TV which sells for 3x more". Its not the screen which makes it perform its the electronics behind it... its been the same rule for decades.

i notice when i watch movies or anime on my comp's LCD in dark scenes its hard to see detail and sometimes the top of the screen is darker because of the angle im viewing it on... does this happen with TV LCD's? would i need to keep pulling down the screen if i dont want the darker colours along the top of the screen? or have they figured that out and fixed the problem?

Edited by SKYLVIA

I bougt a 50 inch plasma I play my xbox360 a hell of a lot, and pull allnighters on the weekends when I play on line. I havent had a problem with it, I did do some research before I bought one. Also when I asked about it, I was told that a plasma would be better for playing games because the colours refresh faster than LCDs, thats my 2 cents

i notice when i watch movies or anime on my comp's LCD in dark scenes its hard to see detail and sometimes the top of the screen is darker because of the angle im viewing it on... does this happen with TV LCD's? would i need to keep pulling down the screen if i dont want the darker colours along the top of the screen? or have they figured that out and fixed the problem?

LCD monitors and LCD TVs are very different... ie. if you get a DiVX player and play a DiVX on your LCD TV and then your PC, you will notice the difference, especially if your using the Component cables rather then Composite.

I can view my LCD from vast angles without it affecting my view... LCD monitors are designed to be viewed from directly in front as thats generally where your sitting in front of a PC.

Oh, and best advice you can ever get, DONT listen to salesmen... especially the ones from Harvey Norman or any watered down "Home Theatre experts"... generally the only Sales People that do have a clue are the ones at specialised HT stores

  • 2 weeks later...

The world of Panel Displays are all over the shop remember JB Hi-Fi (other cheap stores)= old generation equipment.

LCD's are generaly for gaming and still image (action is a blurr watch close) whereas Plasma is designed for low light put one in the sun and try to watch it it will be a blank screen to the degree (can still suffer image burn).

Best way to decide on what you want is what is-will it be used for room conditions, lighting, viewing angle, their are so many factors to keep account of.

I read that wait for Laser wow if you wait for that why not wait for the next gen Panels (read in a HiFi mag 3D is being released to the Commercial market soon), so if you want, you get.

Hi-Fi is a hobby of mine love setting up new system, if you need anything else connection types etc send us a PM :rolleyes: , the world of this stuff is great and forever changing.

Duane

  • 1 month later...

Yeah but I bet you this new Phillips 3D tv is going to cost mega $$$! :P Not to mention you won't be able to enjoy the full benefits it can offer until all movies, games, entertainment and tv come up to speed with it...... which will probably take another 5 years from it's initial release to even warrant buying one. :D

My brother in law decided he would go a different route and paid 2k for a LCD Rear Projection TV.... never been a fan but its 62" and it looks it lol Its farkin HUGE.

Looks awesome with movies and games n stuff... which is what he uses it for... but it weighs like 60kgs... but for something that gigantic u would kind of expect and even then for the size its not bad... when i worked for Toshiba the 60s we had at the time were 100kgs.

  • 1 month later...

if you want something with high resolution for lower cost then get an LCD with native 1080p (eg X Series Sony Bravia). If you want something that you can use in direct sunlight or is really bright with excellent contrast get a plasma. Plasma's in general are low res, unless you pay big bucks for em, and LCD's in general are not as bright unless you pay big bucks for them.

Go to a harvey norman etc, and get them to hook up a PS3 to a Sony X Series Bravia or a Panasonic Viera using the HDMI plug at 1080p, and then you will know the meaning of crisp clear image.

1080p is real HD, unfortunately only blue ray, HDDVD and some PS3 and XBOX360 games offer this high a resolution. TV broadcast in australia is still 576i or 576p at best. A normal DVD is 576p. The number indicates how many lines are in a pic, the more lines, the crisper the pic/ the letter "i" or "p" indicates how the lines are drawn... "i" is for interlaced, "p" is for progressive... an interlaced image only carries half the lines per refresh of the screen, so therefore is less clearer than a progressive as you need 2 scans per full image compared to a single progressive scan.

If you're only ever going to watch regular DVD's and broadcast/cable TV on your TV, then stick to a 720p res HDTV which is cheap. If you're gonna be playing a PS3 or XBOX 360, using a PC or want to play Blu Ray or HD DVD, or are buying something to last you for the next 5 years then buy a 1080p HDTV.

for your price range I'd recommend a 42" Panasonic Viera for $2520 if you want true HD

or a 50" LG which does 728p for 2240 if you don't want the beesknees, but still want relatively high quality.

Whoever feeds you the "jap brands are crap" line is on crack, in the LCD/Plasma quality and development race its the Jap and Korean brands that are the innovators, the European brands are the followers... even though these days they're all multinational corporations.

well I just ordered my new TV Sony XBR 46inch. 1080p http://www.sony.com.au/proaudio/catalog/pr...jsp?id=KDL46XBR

I was going to be one of the original X series but when I heard they were being discontinued I held out for a few weeks and got this. not much difference, but a few. it's 100hz, higher contrast, has 'motion flow' chip and a few other nice things. best of all it comes in gun metal grey just like my GTR. :blink:

can't wait till it gets here.

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.pioneer.co.uk/files/eur/Plasma_..._whitepaper.pdf

There ya go, no contest. If your not sure run down to a jb hi-fi and ask them to set up similar lcd/plasma tele's next to each other both runnin hdmi etc and you'll see for your own eyes. Remember that contrast on a tele tends to be even more important than resolution as thats actually what your eye see's. I think in under 37' there isn't too much difference but the plasma's are noticeably better over that.

One important thing to remember is if you are playing video games or are interested in watching sport on the tv's, plasma's have a much faster refresh rate on the screen so images moving at quick speeds etc will appear alot more focused and clear on a plasma than an lcd tv.

Thats my 2c considerin I just had/made the choice myself >_<

oh yeah, thought I'd mention... The Good Guys have a Conia 1024x768 (1080i/720p) 42" Plasma for $996, which is cheap as, even if its not true HD. Dosen't have HDMI inputs but takes VGA and component.

Was considering getting one to chuck in the spare room.

my ole' faithfull magnavox gave up the ghost the other week,

so i went down to jb's and picked up a soniq 32 inch lcd.

definitely not up to par with some of the stuff you guys are looking into, but for what i paid, its a pretty awesome little unit.

currently running it at 1080i (which is supposed to be better? 1080i or 1080p?), hasnt skipped a beat.

actually, now that i think of it, it actually looks better than the samsung 42inch lcd we have in the living room, im not sure what the go is with that one, has some pretty ugly lines going through it almost constantly...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...