Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

keep the revs under 4k, and as you take off a standing start, accelerate a bit quick (not too quick) to around 30km/h so the rings bed in properly before the 1000km or 1500km is up.

also, try not to hold it at a constant rev, i.e. highway driving.

dont sit in the same gear all the time at same speed

i.e. sit in 2nd at 50, sit in 4th at 50 - keep changing gears but not giving it a boot full

yeh take it easy for the first 500kms then slowly increase your revs and boost (well keep this at 7psi). Make sure you dont just drive at the one speed either vary it upto 80kms/hr then once you hit bout 750kms start to increase you top speed aswell.

ok i will do my best to drive it like that then

what about boost levels mine will only kick in at like 4000 anyway so do i drive it off boost untill its run in?

or do i give it a litlle say to like 5000 every now ang again??

Baby the car for the firt 100-200 km, changing early before boost. after that change enigne oil and filter, might wanna buy a filter magnet to trap shavings incase there are some. for the 200-500 km bring the car up to revs a little quiker then u used to but dont fang the car into boost. at 500 km change the oil and filter again. after this drive till about 80-90 km/h in the 5th gear. and when the enigne is at operating temps and you see a free pass, gear down hard and give her evrything she's got pull about 2 gears on full song after that decellarate and take you 80km/h grandpa drive, dont fang it too often, continue till 1000km but keep the boost low at about 8-9psi. at the 1000km mark youll be changing oil and filter for the last time now its time for the power run in, get it tuned for full power and your desired boost level, and now where the oppertunity presents itself give her all she has, when you overtake dont hesitate to bring her on full song, continue to about 1500 kms and your done with runnin in the engine. the frequent oil changes i do because the micro metal shavings that are normal to exist in a new-rebuilt engine have been known to stuff up bearings. this procedure has worked for me till now and ive run in 2 RB's and 10-12 haulpack engines

Anthony.

Just bed the rings in on the dyno (the tuner/motor builder will know what to do)

Then tune it up. Simple as that.

IMO based on the countless motors ive seen done this way, "running in" a motor is frankly a load of crap. :)

If the motor is built right, just get straight up it. All the RB26/25's you'll see running around any of the track days are all done like this, all run perfectly fine.

Thats the true test.

yeah the main reason for running in an engine is to make sure the new rings bed into the honed cylinder walls properly. so basicly by varying the speed at which the engine runs places different loads on the rings compared to just sitting at one speed with not much load as this will glaze ur cylinders. so if ur really keen take it for a mountain run but still keep the revs to around max 4 grand or so. this loads up the rings nicely as ur constantly on and off the throttle as well as loading and un loading the rings.

ffs, the people who say baby it for the first 200 kms or so have no clue, this is the most crucial period for the rings to bed in, you risk glazing the bores or not getting a propper seal if you dont load up the motor straight away, likewise you should avoid idling and sitting on constant RPM.

best way to run the motor in is to use stock boost settings, and drive it hard through hills, that way the motor see's a varying rev and load range. If the motor breaks during this period, its a shit rebuild :)

Anthony.

Just bed the rings in on the dyno (the tuner/motor builder will know what to do)

Then tune it up. Simple as that.

IMO based on the countless motors ive seen done this way, "running in" a motor is frankly a load of crap. :)

If the motor is built right, just get straight up it. All the RB26/25's you'll see running around any of the track days are all done like this, all run perfectly fine.

Thats the true test.

+1

Just bit of load at low/med revs to get gas pressure behind the rings so they run a bit more tension against the bores to bed them in . No rocket science , I like SK's idea of using a cheap garden variety Castrol oil without the friction modifiers to help it along .

Thrashers be warned , because everything has been apart there will always be a slight chance something may leak and if an oil/water hose connection goes in a big way its the expensive engine that may need another rebuild . Also if some mechanical thing works loose you may not hear it before it goes bang at high revs . Oopsh .

Your engine - your money - your call .

Cheers A .

just to warn you guys who think thrashing is the way to go:

i spent 8k rebuilding my m3. the mechanic was a firm believer of the 'tune it on the dyno' theory.

so i was thrashing it over the weekend and it was back in the shop 2 days later from a spun bearing (as all bearings were replaced).

the guy who built it has to fork out for another rebuild.

he then told me to baby it for the next 1k after i got it back.

its not just the rings that need to be bedded in. its the bearings too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...