Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by Soulja

Inasnt i am 17 turning 18 why? like i said i must be mistaken cuz i have had friends done it to there car in the states.

I found wat im tring to talking about i guess u guy have no idea what im talking about so maybe this will give u an idea sorry again for the mixup

RB26DETT engine has been fully tuned and overhauled just 6,000 kms ago

sorry again i guess i didnt explain it right my fault

I knew it! :P

the clues came when u talked firstly about the 500hp nos shot and then about the 35psi boost.

So i can predict this 600rwhp vette of yours is a long long long long long way from ever happening!

I aint having a go at u, but unless u have a car that is capable dont talk about 'WHEN' your 600rwhp vette is done it will do all the things it gonna! :)

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Soulja, why are you here? You don't own a Skyline, you don't intend on owning one, you don't even seem to LIKE them, and you never have anything useful to say. And you then start throwing around meaningless phrases like "32 psi is possible" like you know what you're on about when you don't. So why exactly do you post in these forums?

Btw what do you do for a living so that you can afford a 500hp car when you're only 17?

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by Soulja

the vette is in the process; im currently looking for a place to stroke the 350 to 396 and once that is done the d-1 Procharge will be brought and install. (and yes the d-1 procharge sc can hold max boost of 32psi if you dont belived me go to http://www.procharger.com/models.shtml i am talking about D-1 model) I may not have any idea about turbo cars (i was just tring to help) but i know my america/v8 cars so plz dont tell me 32psi (never said 35) boost is not possable and yes 600hp is not my aim i said 500

i hope u plan to drive the vette on roads that are straight coz u know how corners and vettes dont like each other :P

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by Soulja

ahahahaha good try but no im not saying anything.

After u get the turbo and the rest of the mod install i would get the chip custum program 4 your set-up might cost alittle more but will be wroth it

wrong again matie, i already got a apexi power fc which is a fully programmable computer!

Apparently the Stage 2 GCG Turbo can hit 300rwkw with a little to much boost the 9:1 cr of the RB25 det can handle.

BUT.. for 300rwkw 2450 is a fairly good price i think if you compare custome manifolds dump pipe modifications stock look etc..

Depends really what you are after.. And Also remember the GCG turbo will spool quicker than a GT30 for example that will make 300rwkw due to the exhaust housing.

300rwkw is going to be too much for the standard RB25 I think.

Around 240-260 Im aiming for. I want minimum lag with a good boost through the rev range, just like the 28 is doing now, But just some power would be nice.

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by -Joel-

Apparently the Stage 2 GCG Turbo can hit 300rwkw with a little to much boost the 9:1 cr of the RB25 det can handle.

BUT.. for 300rwkw 2450 is a fairly good price i think if you compare custome manifolds dump pipe modifications stock look etc..

Depends really what you are after.. And Also remember the GCG turbo will spool quicker than a GT30 for example that will make 300rwkw due to the exhaust housing.

whats a 2450?? u mean 2540 right? The 2540 is a shit turbo and i would stay away from it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...