Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I want to learn the basics of remapping a car. I have an r32 GTST. What hardware/software do I need to buy to to remap my ecu.

I really want to have a play and learn more about my car.

I have a friend that is experianced in tuning some other type of cars that will give me a hand.

And before you say dont do it you will blow it up,, I really dont care if i destroy the thing its a toy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175035-tuning-my-ownecu/
Share on other sites

Mate there is nothing game about it, you will need an eprom burner, and datascan. A consult also helps. If you can get a wideband a/f meter it also helps, but as long as your car doesnt have any problems(such as fuel pump) then its not absolutely necessary. My first remap was on my Z32 tt. The A/F ratios are calculated in the numbers you enter into the appropriate rom addresses. We entered 12:1 afr for the full power load cells, and took it to a dyno day- result exactly 12:1 afr under load. There are a few programs out there, and many of them are freeware.

The A/F ratios are calculated in the numbers you enter into the appropriate rom addresses. We entered 12:1 afr for the full power load cells, and took it to a dyno day- result exactly 12:1 afr under load. There are a few programs out there, and many of them are freeware.

You sure about that? I'd definitely invest in a wideband O2 sensor for tuning and make sure you hook up some sort of knock detection as well.

You sure about that? I'd definitely invest in a wideband O2 sensor for tuning and make sure you hook up some sort of knock detection as well.

Yep, sure. If your running a stock AFM and injectors, then the cells for load are entered as the hex value of the afr you want to run, but would definately agree about the wide band. Knock can be monitored by consult.

But stock afm/injectors are almost 20 years old now, surely it'd be risky to think they are still working the same as when they came out the factory?

He ran it on a dyno and verified the result, so there's no much room for doubt.

Knock can be monitored by consult.

I have a consult interface and have datascan and ecutalk - neither of which show knock. Do you know of any consult software that has knock reading? Datascan can monitor arbitrary memory locations, so i assume if i knew the location i could read the sensors output...

But stock afm/injectors are almost 20 years old now, surely it'd be risky to think they are still working the same as when they came out the factory?

Everyone who drives these cars assumes they are still working the same, the factory doesnt tune the management to allow for things wearing out. Injectors and AFM tend to fail rather than lose performance, the only exception is injectors which if never cleaned can become dirty(although with modern fuels it doesnt tend to be a problem, there are plenty of cars with 300000k's with the original injectors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...