Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I want to put a sr20de (+t) later on

first of all

does anyone know exact weights between the sr20 alloy block and the rb20 iron block?I had initially wanted to use a sr20de s13 as a track car, but now am looking at skylines.

the sr20de powered s13 with manual transmission weighs in at 1110kg

the rb20de powered r32 with manual transmission weighs in at 1210kg

so if the iron block rb20 engine weights atleast 100kg more than the sr20 alloy block

then I should be fine in terms of weight. weight distribution for the sr powered r32 would be better as well.

does anyone have a guide, for the part ill need for a sr20 swap into an already manual r32 skyline?

i know meggala has done this before, but i need further technical details.

so yeah. what are the weights of the rb20 and the sr20

and what are the parts things i need to have for the swap?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/176633-sr20-swap-into-a-r32-shell/
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure there isnt 100 kg between the two, being that an rb20 short motor only weighs about 100 kg. Usually the conversion is done in conjunction with moving the motor back, this along with the shorter motor move a lot of weight off the front axle. It also allows you to move the rediator/intercooler back as well. Just hope your ready to modify the firewall if you wish to make the most of the transplant. One r32 i saw in japan with an sr20 stroker had the waerpump inline with the base of the windscreen.

An RB20 couldnt possibly weigh 300kgs. Maybe with turbo, gearbox etc all hooked up it might get close. I moved an RB26 block with the help of a friend, and one person can easily lift the head. So im guessing the RB20 weighs about 160kgs ?!?!?!? I have heard that the SR20 is actually the same weight as the CA18?!?!?! Perhaps the SR20 is still a heavy thing iwth its steel liners etc etc

The SR20 is heavier than the CA18.

I havent personally weighed them, I remember a thread on HybridZ, I believe, that said the weights of certain motors.. The CA18 is physically smaller, which I believe makes up for the heavier Iron used in the block.

"Often referred to as the four cylindered RB engine"

"Due to superior head design (cam on bucket, as opposed to the flawed complex and heavy rocker arm actuation of later motors like the SR and QR), many enthusists consider the CA18DET to be the best engine platform since the FJ20ET that powered the legendary DR30 Skyline DOHC-RS."

Why an SR lol...

hehe

thanks for all the suggestions!

but I'd really like to know about the weight differences between the sr20 and the rb20, if anyone has the figures.

sure I've thought about using a lighter chassis like an escort, but to be honest, I want to race a car which i like and like working on, so I've chosen the skyline.

also working to a budget here and skyline shells are cheap as chips and so are sr20de engines. (nz)

1600-2000cc class is quite easy , its called Mazda MX5 . 50 50 weight distribution and suspension better than a lot of things of the box . Huge following in the US so just about everything out there for them . They call them Mazda Miata over there and theres about a fortnights reading at their various sites . Given a choice the slightly later BP18 powered car is the pic .

Sold here and really clean examples dot the countryside .

Only 2 seats but perfect for a club racer without lots of lard , cheers A .

best idea is to ring a wrecker and ask them. they will have a pretty good idea. from my experience I would say the RB20 is about 20-30kg heavier than an SR, but not more than that.

The SR20 is heavier than the CA18.

I havent personally weighed them, I remember a thread on HybridZ, I believe, that said the weights of certain motors.. The CA18 is physically smaller, which I believe makes up for the heavier Iron used in the block.

"Often referred to as the four cylindered RB engine"

"Due to superior head design (cam on bucket, as opposed to the flawed complex and heavy rocker arm actuation of later motors like the SR and QR), many enthusists consider the CA18DET to be the best engine platform since the FJ20ET that powered the legendary DR30 Skyline DOHC-RS."

Why an SR lol...

Nah sorry i build a few CA's and alot of Sr's. I dropped the latest CA build to Drift garage/UPgarage in nsw last week and i cannot lift the 'long' CA at all.... the SR on the other hand i can manouver around my workshop my self.

the 26 in our s13 puts about 30-45kg more over the front axle.

cheers for those numbers, thats what im looking for.

the silvia is a lighter car, but a lot of the weight advantage it has over the skyline is because of the lighter engine.

As i said above the difference between a sr20de s13 and a rb20de r32 is only 100kg. so if your numbers are correct, the chassis weight difference is only 20kg.

by running the sr20de in the r32, the centre of weight is shifted towards the centre of the car which results in better handling.

I would go for a silvia if I could find one in decent condition! there are plenty of manual non turbo r32s around so it seems like a good option.

but hang on a minute. now you are comparing SR20 motor AND gearbox to an RB25 motor and gear box. I would say there is definately a weight difference in the box, and RB25 is heavier than RB20 (granted not by much).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity. Edit: 11kg each (or 10.9/11.1 depending on what my scale decides over multiple tests, the 18x11 don't seem to weigh noticeably any more than 10.5)  
×
×
  • Create New...