Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats exactly what i was going to ask, as far as im aware the 350z has the exact same VQ35DE that the M35 has :? and if anything a standard 350z has a even more open exhaust than what M35 has! whats the deal??

His M35 uses the VQ25DET, which is not used in any other car outside Japan.

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The issue here is that the engine in the car is a VQ25DET, which was not fitted to any vehicles outside Japan. Consequently it was not built to meet the Euro or Californian emissions standards. If it had, there would not have been a problem.

The advice I was given before I purchased the car was that ANY M35 Stagea could be complied. I got this in writing from the compliancer. The SEVS entry at DOTARS permits M35 from 2001 to current, but of course this doesn't mean that the RAWS shop has the evidence. They told me they had. They lied, or made a mistake.

Because the ADR changed at the end of 2003 the ONLY issue preventing this vehicle being complied is that the motor does not comply with the emissions standard. From what I can gather, this is partly to do with emissions on start-up - after the cats get hot the situation is much better. It is not a matter of bolting on a load of goodies and running it on rocket fuel - it would seem that emissions compliance is a bit of a black art. The whole thing is a complete circus, because so long as one vehicle can be modified and complied, any subsequent vehicles can be plated on that evidence, regardless of whether the mods have been done to those vehicles.

I have obtained expert legal advice from my attorney in Sydney, the skinny of which is that the advice I was given came from a professional on whom I could expect to obtain expert advice. Fortunately we have a long paper trail of correspondence that will confirm all this, and when I finally have my day in court the advice I have is that they will lose. I should get all my money back, plus costs and expenses. However, this could take several months, in the meantime I have a fantastic car in my garage that can't be driven. All because some !@#$ made a mistake.

And yes - I am pretty upset about it. This should have been a fun experience. It's turned into a nightmare.

I wait to hear how Muz is going...?

ohh i was under the impression that being a 2004 M35 it might have been the VQ35 model..

but thats even more confusing, because there are currently a few M35 VQ25DET's in australia completely registered and driving around ;)

thats exactly what i was going to ask, as far as im aware the 350z has the exact same VQ35DE that the M35 has :? and if anything a standard 350z has a even more open exhaust than what M35 has! whats the deal??

extremely sorry to hear about this mate ;) i can imagine your pulling your hair out.. hopefully things will turn out bright in the near future

these are VQ25det versions - so turbo. they are failing ADR79.

What a debacle! All I can think to say is that I wish you the best of luck in sorting it out in your favour, which looks pretty likely at this point in time...

AFAIK, the fact that you've got written documentation from the RAWS should help substantially.

ohh i was under the impression that being a 2004 M35 it might have been the VQ35 model..

but thats even more confusing, because there are currently a few M35 VQ25DET's in australia completely registered and driving around ;)

There are. They were all built pre 2004.

You can get VQ25DET stageas manufactured prior to 2003 as far as I know. Would this mean that these stageas would also not be available for compliance? Or does the year play a part as well (ie. if ADR laws changed in '03 does this mean cars before '03 dont have to meet these laws?).

There has been talk of getting the ADR's more inline with european specs and specs from other parts of the world. Apparently our emissions laws etc. make it pretty tough even for car manufacturers to get cars over here, and thats when they HAVE the option to do what they like to the car...

lets hope this changes in the not-too-distant future or we'll all eventually be forced to drive falcodores or something [shudders] ;) (ok, exaggerating a little).

So what exactly will you do with the car??

I anticipate you will ship it out again and then..?

Thats a terrible position to be in.

Look on the bright side, there is the possibility of converting it into a drift machine! A stagea drift car..thatd be different.

Hmmn.. I know it sounds dodgy, but modify/swap build plate for 2003, rego, jobs done.. here in the ACT you only need to get one rego check done on purchase and never again (apart from randoms..) not sure what's like up there, but that would be the way to go down here.

why are you advising people to do illegal things on the forum groonsnout?

what you are suggesting is plain idiotic and liable to land OP a massive fine which could put im out of business for good.

nice suggestion.

why are you advising people to do illegal things on the forum groonsnout?

what you are suggesting is plain idiotic and liable to land OP a massive fine which could put im out of business for good.

nice suggestion.

settle down psycho.. take more or less of whatever you're on

If you're just looking for a solution to get it on the road then how is it any more illegal than other people's sugestions of putting 3 cats on the car just to pass emissions then pulling them off later, or engine swaps and swap backs

you need to take a good hard look at yourself mate.

OK fellas, I have read all that has been said and thank all for the comments. Both Matt and myself were both told unequivocally that our M35's would be right for compliance. We have this in writing although mine is from a different person than Matt's.

Concerning the emissions testing it is as Matt has said, they have tried the route of several cats and they simply do not get hot enough quickly enough to burn the noxious gasses that cause the problem. As Matt has also said, the agency conducting the testing has said in very clear language that there is little liklihood of the car passing the tests. The person who is attempting to get the car through this emissions thing is supposedly going to try with a piggy back ECU next week but we have been told so many porkies that we have lost all faith in the alleged experts.

Our legal advice is very similar to Matt's and it has been suggested that we give the broker that we used a week to try and sort it all out, otherwise it will be off to court for settlement. Mind you, the alleged expert trying to get the car through emissions has had the car for over three months now and really hasn't achieved anything to date. This car was purchased on the 20th of March 2007 and landed in Australia 2 months later which in itself was another debacle but that's another story.

Just as a little side note to all this, the alleged expert doing the emissions testing has at various times suggested that he will buy the car from us if he is not able to get the vehicle approved in a reasonable time frame. The car is a top of the line M35 AR-X with everything. Kinda makes you think doesn't it?

cheers

Muz

I have a 2002 M35 with the VQ25DET sitting in Japan which is a test car for me and for passing ADR 79 we have to put 3 catalytic converters in it but the newer version or 79 is harder again to pass and we have a big problem on turbo charged cars, the 2004 Cima had over 100,000 klm's on it and it still passed.

On a 2005 CPV35 with 170 single klm's it passed up to 2005 quite easily so we gave it a run for the new EURO standards but it did not even come close, I did offer to buy a 1,000 klm M35 to get ADR 79 for 2004/05 but they think even then it might fail.

As a RAW I honestly feel sorry for the predicament you are in as I have imported a couple of cars for emissions but I have always used my own cars as it can take 12 months, we need a car to pass eventually but that doesn't help you.

I added this to try and shed a bit of light to others on the forum but at least you have it in writing from the importer.

Dude, I feel for you. I'm importing ATM as well and I would be livid if that happened to me.

What I am failing to understand however, is why the list of eligible vehicles on the DOTARS site does not accurately reflect this? As far as I'm concerned, they shouldn't list a vehicle there if nobody holds the evidence pack - seems ridiculous to me.

Everyone who is saying, 'put in a couple of extra cats' and shit like that - do you think that a car passing Euro/US emissions is that easy? It's likely the inherent design of the engine and its associated components. There's a reason why there are no turbocharged Nissan variants on sale in Aus + a lot of tasty stuff we never see. We're talking pass/fail criteria of several parts per millon of certain outputs - a frickin power FC tune ain't gonna do jack shit!

I agree Kineso its disgsuting that DOTARS gave an import approval for a car/engine combination they know will not be able to be registered.

Surely if the 25det cant pass a 35de swap would be a worthwhile option, say $5k to do.

I agree Kineso its disgsuting that DOTARS gave an import approval for a car/engine combination they know will not be able to be registered.

Surely if the 25det cant pass a 35de swap would be a worthwhile option, say $5k to do.

To make it through the process the vehicle must be in original condition so all those thinking engine swaps are way off the mark. Just wish it was that easy! And I think the $5000 grand is a total guestimate.

Cheers

Muz

The vehicle is eligible to come in which is why an import approval was issued by DOTARS but it isn't till the workshop has to prove the car meets the ADR's were the problem lies, now someone always has to bring the first car in for different test to be completed, I know of a few people mislead by importers lately on emission tests which has caused problems like this.

Under ADR 79 an emission report is required for each transmission variant so with the V35 skyline as an example one for 3.5 5 Speed Auto, 8 Speed Auto, 6 speed Manual, 2.5 4 Speed and 3.0 5 Speed then the CPV35 one for 5 Speed Auto and one for 6 Speed Manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...