Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

oh crap...

what exactly is he going for? roll cage / dirty big filter out the bonnet - extensive sub/sound system - salon interior / pink...pink for fuucks sake !!!

looks like someone isnt good at making the hard decisions :|

Edited by Munkyb0y

i reckon there is something wrong with it 4 sure bro. those motors are f**ken expensive yeah andd he hasnt even kicked it over if he wantd a cr like that he shoulda got a monaro or something. and a 33 y????

pink is fugly lookin as well

Pfft never been started. Who the hell builds up a car with big powerfull engine etc, hooks every thing up to it to work, then goes "hmm i dont think i want to hear this run now or take it for a drive".

Yeah right.

something mells fishy doesnt it!

It has a Chev' badge on the front, go Aussie pride lol

I have to say, the owner seems to have put alot of time/effort/money on the car. Wasted in my opinion, I think Skylines are everything V8s aren't. Quiet, subtle, modern and with a little less bogan spec. Not to say it won't hammer, 6.5L is a little on the largish scale. Got to laugh at the X-Box in it though, spend all that money and decide the 360 is too much :laughing-smiley-014: .

But let for a second imagine he gets it all set up, running and decides to keep it. He says he wanted to build it for street/strip, so I imagine he wants to drive it on the road. Would you be brave enough to drive it around without insurance for fear of the "LOOK AT ME!!!" that it will send out to police and thieves alike, not to mention the everyday idiot on the road? Would you be able to afford the insurance? Would you be even able to GET insurance?

At least it doesn't have chromes, although I think it may be a matter of time...

clearly the owner set out to make something different and that is what they have done. ALOT of work has been done to it so i can respect it from that point of view but the bright pink on a v8 skyline is a bit much though.

its like saying look at this tough car....it has a chevy badge on it, its bright pink it sounds mean but i have a jamie oliver lisp and listen to classical music through my subs.

with a spray job it would be sweet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...