Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats the drivers side. Maybe because there is more pressure in bank two due to the return flow regulator being on that side (I think it is)?

Thats my 2c!

But that would not explane why it threw up the fault code would it?

There is only one O2 sensor on the turbo, bank one. It is seeing a lean condition and can't add enough fuel to compensate.

If the o2 sensor was buggered it could cause this along with bad fuel economy, it needs to be checked for oscillation, otherwise you should do as Cam mentioned and check the filter and fuel pump.

After doing some googling some other things that popped up with this code were:

MAF, vac leak, PCV and the fuel filter as Cam said.

Scotty:

Fuel economy has been ok, well as good an an M35 can be. Have not seen a spike as such.

When you mention the O2 sensor do you mean the one on the dump yes? If it was this would it not effect both banks not just throw up an error on bank 1?

FYI: The issue came about from normal driving conditions in peak hour, not giving it much stick at all. When I got home I checked the fault code and then cleared it, ran the car for 5-10 min and it has yet to come backl.

Cheers.

There is only one o2 sensor (the one in the dump), bank one is it's name. The 3.5's have bank one and two as they run twin o2 sensors. If it doesn't come back you may be fine.

O2 sensors only have an 80,000k life so there is a good chance it needs changing anyway.

Genuine.

Have the books and also the de-reg papers that show the kms every time it was serviced and everytime it was registered. When I received it the kms were only at 29XXX.

Yeah I paid a bit more for it but got a very clean car, inside and out. I have seen other M35's, most other M35's I have seen have very dirty under carriage and engine bays. This is so clean you could eat off any surface, the previous owner must of only drove it once in a blue moon.

Cool, good to hear. Mine had genuine 59k on it with de reg paper and also was very clean under the car and engine bay. Only problem I found was a chocolate milk stain on the back seat from kids. When I removed the rear seat I found little girls hair clips and collector cards, so was deffinately the family wagon.

Hi everyone

a +38 offset will sit inside an ARX more? 18x8

if will, can I run bolt on spaces to make it sit flash?

The spacers you buy will have to be custom if the wheels you are fitting are stock. This is due to the hub centering ring on the hub and groove in the wheel being the same. Normally when running a bolt on spacer you are using aftermarket wheels which have a larger bore and that's what off the shelf spacers centering hub on the wheel side will allow for.

Hope that makes sence...

The spacers you buy will have to be custom if the wheels you are fitting are stock. This is due to the hub centering ring on the hub and groove in the wheel being the same. Normally when running a bolt on spacer you are using aftermarket wheels which have a larger bore and that's what off the shelf spacers centering hub on the wheel side will allow for.

Hope that makes sence...

Actually, most of the off the shelf spacers will have both hub centering bore/rings the same size.

If you go different hub bore size on new wheels; it's normally up to you.

The thinnest custom spacer I've ever machined for a Nissan with hub centering rings on the outside, and matching bores on the inside is 8mm; anything below that, and the centering ring on the outside has no material behind it.

I've never seen an off the shelf spacer with centering bore/rings thinner than 10mm, so Rafael should be ok.

Edited by Daleo

Actually, most of the off the shelf spacers will have both hub centering bore/rings the same size.

If you go different hub bore size on new wheels; it's normally up to you.

The thinnest custom spacer I've ever machined for a Nissan with hub centering rings on the outside, and matching bores on the inside is 8mm; anything below that, and the centering ring on the outside has no material behind it.

I've never seen an off the shelf spacer with centering bore/rings thinner than 10mm, so Rafael should be ok.

Could you please point me in the direction of these as most places I've been to in Adelaide only stock ones with a 66.1 inner but a 73.1 or other outer meaning you can't space out stock wheels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...