Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did anyone even know it was on let alone catch it?

Short story is you didnt miss anything :worship:

Good thing the event is so much fun, and fortunately didnt have sponsors hanging for air time and exposure because the Channel 9 programme does nothing for the events profile :(

Totally agree,

Sux, it seem like all they want is to show more on expensive cars, V8 and that it. A bit on your car Troy, a bit of snowy and that was it. They talked more about the Porka but not Snowy, he's the winner man.

Was pretty piss poor.

I wanted to show my old man some of the SAU cars, and only had like 3 chances. Scotsmans car was only on the intro and that was it. Had a few shots of Snowy's machine, and I think I only saw yours twice Brisby, and Frysy's car was on once...

Although, the gate sounded good :worship:

Seriously - what did you expect? It's a 30min Commercial TV show - so 20mins max of actual air time. With a field of 100 odd cars divided into that amount of time you could only cover about 12s of each car if that is all you did. But that isn't the object of the show.

From the 10 mins I saw today we got more coverage this time than we did in the last one from W.A. where we got basically nothing despite coming 2nd. I can't imagine what more you could expect though given the time allocated to cover a 3 day event with a field of that size.

What did i expect? I didnt expect to see any footage of my car. What i did expect was footage of runs from each event caught on film...perhaps more summaries of points after events and actual footage of the cars that were in the top 10. And when they show footage of the cars its not the same footage from 3 mins earlier.

For an event to be 'filmed' for the purpose of airing it on tv there is sooo much that could have been better! For starters where was the email telling us that it will be on channel 9 today!? (on grand final day... so who the hell is watching channel 9 anyway!???)

It is the way it is, and there is probably nothing we can do, but to show shit all of anything good/entertaining/impressive is crap. For e.g: to focus on a guy in a ferrari who is stationary looking at his map half way round a motakhana for 10 'precious' seconds is beyond rediciulous. I dont care what angle you take on that, its not entertaining compared to what could have been showed.

if they are hoping to have attracked people who are likely to go to Dubai then fair enough. i must miss the gene that inspires me to do so by watching this... but for the teams out there who work their asses off the be at the event, drive the titts off their cars to get some results and actually have sponsors that would care if their car is seen on tv then it is rediculous. Goodluck getting them onboard next year...

As Troy said, i too dont really expect to be shown on tv, but would be one to reallly appreciate it even though im not at the really pointy end... but neither are the smoke machiene commodores and ferrari.

And they stole my cheer...

Dutton 08 in a commodore with concussion!

Oh man....I didn't know it was on.....anyone got any footage of it?

Too be honest I didn't expect much more from ch9...as snowie says it is a commercial 30min show. However I figured that winning the thing would've meant some airtime!

The problem is that up until now the media have seen the Dutton as more of a "rich blokes playing with their cars" than a serious motorsport event. It is why apparently a lot of the print media no longer cover the event. So the TV coverage has always been based towards individual cars and drivers - especially those that are event sponsors (Thrifty, Road Sense, Sportsmed.SA, Competition Friction, etc) rather than the event itself.

Having recently spoken to Sam and Mossy about the T.V. coverage amoungst other things we got to hear that basically because the Dutton was part of the Car Show coverage this was chanel 9's decision on how they were going to cover it.

However they are looking at changing it for next year I know. They are looking at changing the profile of the event as a sport rather than a rich boys weekend away (mostly because now the level of competition has changed compared to when the event first started out) and the T.V. coverage will refelct that. I know the Dutton guys are scared of it turning into a "Speed Week" kinda of coverage which they find boring as hell but I think the plan for 08 is to get the coverage to focus on 2-3 feature events rather than the whole weekend (again too hard to cover 29 events in 30mins) - but they will still need to do "specials" on their sponsors you can be sure of that. But they do understand that us as competitors need to be able to expose our sponsors as well if they want us to be able to continue to come to these events.

mt buller challenge FTW coverage wise :rolleyes:

i thought the porsche bit was bit of a laugh, old dude cool calm collected and his wife screaming random commands... flat....turn...slip...brake...brake.. BRAKE. saw a few familar cars... white 180sx, and two gtrs white and blue... pity there was not more but a mate who is a typical tv bogan loved the coverage.... so who figures maybe we are the viewing minority?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...