Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

While getting my transfer case replaced, my mechanic told me my g-sensor for the ATTESA is stuffed, and costs upwards of $2500. Apparently I shouldn't rely on it to engage the front wheels any time soon.

Has anyone had to deal with replacing this unit? I had to relocate it for the manual conversion, if anyone who's done this conversion has had the same thing happen let me know.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/
Share on other sites

excuse my ignorance but I was under the impression that the front wheels were driven all the time? Split front to rear is 40/60 from what I can remember. Is there anyway of double checking his diagnosis?

$2500 for a sensor is crazy !

Maybe you can bypass the sensor and just run the front wheels all the time?

While getting my transfer case replaced, my mechanic told me my g-sensor for the ATTESA is stuffed, and costs upwards of $2500. Apparently I shouldn't rely on it to engage the front wheels any time soon.

Has anyone had to deal with replacing this unit? I had to relocate it for the manual conversion, if anyone who's done this conversion has had the same thing happen let me know.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3389299
Share on other sites

erm, no you can't. AFAIK, the split varies all the way down tp 5/95

Also the atessa fluid, as well as providing hydraulic pressure, also cools and lubricates the whole system so if the pump is not recieving the correct instructions then you are risking the transfer case internals.

I have an operating g-sensor available Leshy, but how would we go transporting it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3389448
Share on other sites

While getting my transfer case replaced, my mechanic told me my g-sensor for the ATTESA is stuffed, and costs upwards of $2500. Apparently I shouldn't rely on it to engage the front wheels any time soon.

Has anyone had to deal with replacing this unit? I had to relocate it for the manual conversion, if anyone who's done this conversion has had the same thing happen let me know.

Cheers

heh, i threw mine away

maybe thats why the 4wd light is on....and im missing a front driveshaft lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3389457
Share on other sites

cause and effect .. good sleuthing there!

from what Dale said, is it because the sensor was stuffed, the Atessa did not supply the oil and that stuffed the T/C internals?

Dale : how big physically is the sensor? are they particularly fragile or something?

I found a good freight company called AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL COURIERS

Unit 14/ 45 Tomlinson Rd Welshpool 6106 Phone :13 2088

they might be able to do a good deal on transporting that sensor.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3390346
Share on other sites

Nah, the transfer case was making bad noises well before I got hold of it. The part that failed was the chain that runs the front driveshaft. It was probably flogged before I got to it.

The way the mech explained it is that a faulty G-sensor prevents the front wheels engaging when the rears slip, it doesn't run the ATESSA 100% and burn out the T/C.

Stinky, how much do you want for it? If you wrap it in enough bubble wrap and secure it in a decent box it shouldn't get damaged. I don't know why mine is but there's a little sensor on the side that turns red when it's damaged. sort of like a geiger counter ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3390498
Share on other sites

so its like those G-force sensitive stickers you can put on packages that goes red if it experiences over a certain amount of Gforce? thats pretty cool !

Nah, the transfer case was making bad noises well before I got hold of it. The part that failed was the chain that runs the front driveshaft. It was probably flogged before I got to it.

The way the mech explained it is that a faulty G-sensor prevents the front wheels engaging when the rears slip, it doesn't run the ATESSA 100% and burn out the T/C.

Stinky, how much do you want for it? If you wrap it in enough bubble wrap and secure it in a decent box it shouldn't get damaged. I don't know why mine is but there's a little sensor on the side that turns red when it's damaged. sort of like a geiger counter ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3390559
Share on other sites

Nah, the transfer case was making bad noises well before I got hold of it. The part that failed was the chain that runs the front driveshaft. It was probably flogged before I got to it.

The way the mech explained it is that a faulty G-sensor prevents the front wheels engaging when the rears slip, it doesn't run the ATESSA 100% and burn out the T/C.

Stinky, how much do you want for it? If you wrap it in enough bubble wrap and secure it in a decent box it shouldn't get damaged. I don't know why mine is but there's a little sensor on the side that turns red when it's damaged. sort of like a geiger counter :thumbsup:

Thats what I was worried about.

I have a good mate in the freight industry, I will have a chat to him about getting it freighted, and if I can get it insured and I will get back to you dude.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3390779
Share on other sites

What does it look like???? Where does it fit? How can you tell if its stuffed. How do you test it? It could be a big $ maintenance worry.

Pics, please Dale. If possible. Any info on this part would be greatly appreciated by a lot of us.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3390888
Share on other sites

soz for hijacking this thread. I think i have a smilar problem. Whats that thing rigt underneath at the start of the rear tailshaft? Right after the transmission manual It looks like a wiper motor being wrapped up. And its got a tube running to the rear of the car. Its got a big patch of oil on it. Its not dripping but you can tell when the car its up in the hoist. Is it the ATTESSA?

Its not dripping oil or anything but its just damp. :emme know.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3391041
Share on other sites

the attessa fluid bottle in the boot has nothing what so ever to do with the oil in the transfer case its totally seperate. The attessa fluid bottle is for the hydraulic actuator pump that is on the rear of the box (as STASIS is talking about above), it just pressures the actuator when the attessa ecu says so. The transfer case has its own oil, its the same type of oil as the attessa bottle but the attessa bottle in no way shows how full the transfer case is.

running no 4wd while the tf case has oil in it will not cause an issue at all as long as the actuator has the air bleed off to release the pressure onto the clutch packs.

Edited by unique1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3391213
Share on other sites

Leshy it is pretty unusual for the sensor to be stuffed, it is normally wiring, low voltage or a heap of other issues. was the 4wd light on?

the stagea sensor will match to something else for sure, probably 33 gtr but they may all be the same....maybe get someone to check in the part numbers thread.

just get something sceond hand from a wreck.

i moved mine for the manual conversion too and it is working fine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3391217
Share on other sites

My 4WD light isn't on, my mech just noticed the g-force sticker on the side was red, meaning it had sustained a large impact or something and it probably wouldn't work all the time.

I haven't noticed any problems with it, I was just trying to work out if it was a common problem and why it would cost up to $2500 for a new one. I think my transfer case killing itself and this g-sensor are separate, yet coincidental issues.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3391359
Share on other sites

What does it look like???? Where does it fit? How can you tell if its stuffed. How do you test it? It could be a big $ maintenance worry.

Pics, please Dale. If possible. Any info on this part would be greatly appreciated by a lot of us.

Like Duncan and Leshy have pointed out, the manual conversion requires it to be moved. This is where it is in mine, dunno about the Duncan's, Leshy's or anyone else's.

Stageabits013.jpg

Stageabits003s.jpg

Stageabits014.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187818-g-sensor/#findComment-3391691
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...