Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 812
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You obviously have never heard of a V8SC engine then...even our Fujitsu cars make 620hp at flywheel and they are 5 Litre 2 valve 'dinosaurs' running on pump premium

I'm not criticising the LSX range of motors as I'm a fan of how well they perform throughout the entire rev range when compared to some of the four valve v8's available. But comparing a super car engine to a standard street driven engine is a bit of a wank considering theres been about 15years of R&D to get to a current power level of around 640hp = 2.1hp/cube. Lets turn back the clock 8 years when they were making around the 580hp mark = 1.9hp/cube after five years of R&D.

So your saying now that if you take your holden 5L beast down to joe Bloggs "2hp/cube" Engine builders he will be able to give you an engine back that produces 608hp - 60 hp for trans = 548hp = 408rwkw. I dont know about you but I've tuned probably 40-50 304 engines from VN-VT in various forms over the past 5 years and I have never seen 1 go anywhere near this number not even within 100kw. I have also tuned around 150-200 LSX engines in various levels of modification and have never seen a 5.7L go over 300rwkw.

The figures I quote are from a properly strapped, barometric, humdity and temperature compensated dyno dynamics dyno. And as for american engine builders - their fuels are better and there dyno's read higher.

How do you figure their fuels are better???

Being american they have a different method for calculating RON and MON levels which typically is a lesser figure than our RON and MON figures but is actually a higher octane fuel with a higher density even though their ethanol concentration is higer. Also from tuning similar cars abroad it was seen that their full power ignition numbers where high than that same equivalent car back in AUS.

So your saying now that if you take your holden 5L beast down to joe Bloggs "2hp/cube" Engine builders he will be able to give you an engine back that produces 608hp - 60 hp for trans = 548hp = 408rwkw.

Yes, that's precisely what I'm saying. If you can't do it, it doesn't mean it can't be done. I've seen it done more than most and will happily list a dozen places that will do the same. Seriously mate, 600hp from 304 cubes is a big deal but far from difficult to acheive. Why don't you understand?

And as for american engine builders - their fuels are better and there dyno's read higher.

Hogshit. Plain and simple.

Yes, that's precisely what I'm saying. If you can't do it, it doesn't mean it can't be done. I've seen it done more than most and will happily list a dozen places that will do the same. Seriously mate, 600hp from 304 cubes is a big deal but far from difficult to acheive. Why don't you understand?

Hogshit. Plain and simple.

Please list these street driven 600hp weapons you speak of I'd love to know who is building them.

Please list these street driven 600hp weapons you speak of I'd love to know who is building them.

Case in point. Local car to me, 308 cube -3 headed Holden, single carb, 592hp @ 7300rpm. This motor then had 275 gas thrown at it and ran high 8's in a 3140lb car with a 2 speed glide.

You are the only person talking about street driven. Everyone else is talking about hp/cube. Incidentally, yes. The above is street driven whenever he gets the time.

I'm not criticising the LSX range of motors as I'm a fan of how well they perform throughout the entire rev range when compared to some of the four valve v8's available. But comparing a super car engine to a standard street driven engine is a bit of a wank considering theres been about 15years of R&D to get to a current power level of around 640hp = 2.1hp/cube. Lets turn back the clock 8 years when they were making around the 580hp mark = 1.9hp/cube after five years of R&D.

So your saying now that if you take your holden 5L beast down to joe Bloggs "2hp/cube" Engine builders he will be able to give you an engine back that produces 608hp - 60 hp for trans = 548hp = 408rwkw. I dont know about you but I've tuned probably 40-50 304 engines from VN-VT in various forms over the past 5 years and I have never seen 1 go anywhere near this number not even within 100kw. I have also tuned around 150-200 LSX engines in various levels of modification and have never seen a 5.7L go over 300rwkw.

The figures I quote are from a properly strapped, barometric, humdity and temperature compensated dyno dynamics dyno. And as for american engine builders - their fuels are better and there dyno's read higher.

your original post was bagging out 'donkey 2 valve' engines...you didnt say anything about street engines...anyway my business partener had a 620hp V8SC in his GT40 replica so it is a street engine...go the good ol 2 valve

Please list these street driven 600hp weapons you speak of I'd love to know who is building them.

My business parter has a GT40 replica with one of our V8SC engines(all 620hp of it) in it all mod plated and regularly driven down for coffee on Sunday lol and scares the sht out of all the posers in their 997's :thumbsup:

edit forget to mention 620 flywheel HP and 1100 kg .........well you do the math

Edited by gtr660hp

just FYI... to those screaming foul about someone putting an LS1 into a Nissan...

http://press.nissan-global.com/COMMON/HERI...detail.html?047

After the 4th tournament (1967), the year was included in the Japan GP title. Nissan produced the R381, equipped with a Chevrolet 5.5-liter V8 engine, for the 1968 Japan GP. Its unique "aero stabilizers" - the left and right portions of the wing moving independently - earned it the nickname "Monster Bird". This commemorative car is the victorious No. 20, driven by H. Kitano.

Engine is back out now as i am starting the build, but as earlier mentioned only the rack was changed.

Ill take a pic when i put it back in.

I don't spose you got any pics of the engine bay with just the crossmember in, or have any pics of under the crossmember with engine fitted?

A friend of mine is going to tune the car for me and is confident the engine will make the power.

A custom cam from competition cams has been ground to suit my car as it is considerably lighter than your average commodore, all new springs & retainers and roller rockers, all the usual stuff as you would know requires upgrading.

Doing a piston to valve clearance tonight to see how much we can skim off the heads and how much the pistons require relieving, other than that a quick port clean up and thats it. I will probably run a high octane race fuel rather than pump so we can run a bit more comp and more agressive ignition curve. Ill be sure to keep an eye on the things you mentioned. Probably a few months off starting it, but ill post up dyno sheets when tuned.

No offence but 350rwkw aspirated out of 5.7 is alot of horsepower. I've never seen a 5.7L make more than about 300rwkws aspirated and that was in a fully built ultima I tuned. You may get close to that mark but over 300rwkw you will need cubes and lots of work. You'd be better off to keep the cam size small around the 224 square at 50 112 lope seperation and throw a harrop supercharger on it. Depending upon the the fuel system the 42lb should be enough for arund 400rwkw on the stock 4bar system. You will however need to trick the ecu into thinking it has less air than it actually has so you dont run out of ignition resolution. If you run a rising rate system you should be able to do this. Thats assuming you have calibrated the ecu correctly.

Rob82 you are a straight out knob!!! Re-read what is actually said and what you came up with as responses. If you are in the tuning business and you have never tuned more less heard about ls1's making over 300rwkw NA you need to get out of the job!!!

Thats all I can really say.

I have personally built a vy ss ute with: cam, pushrods, inlet manifold, and tune makes 322RWKW, Adrian has seen the car I am refering to and I can get dyno sheets to prove this. It is in street commodores with the dyno sheet printed for heavens sake.

We are currently rebuilding this car with a stroker crank, better heads, bigger cam, more comp and based on a motor that Sams Performance have built, with similar mods, that just this weekend made 411RWKW at a nationally syndicated dyno competition, following national dyno guidelines for dyno comps, Ie stricter than your local shop trying to inflate dyno figures, Id say your comments about 2 valve heads being donkey are just as biased and stereotypical as a redneck having a go at anything japanese as a rice burner.

Edited by Fitzpatrick Speed Works

Hey guys, lets not get lost any further in this power figure debate, 300kw and or 400hp was a

number that was mentioned by guys that drift as the optimal power u need in a relitively light car to

drift, obviously there are cars with considerably less and also more power than this that drift, but

it was said to be a solid combination. whether the car makes this power or not doesnt really matter, it was just a hyperthetical goal i set with the mild engine work i am doing. time will tell. even if it falls short, the car should still be a fun drive. The thread was supposed to be more orientated towards the fittment of the engine rather than the power the engine can make, besides the increase in torque at lower RPM compared with a turbo engine is the main advantage with the V8 anyway, not so much peak power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...