Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just contact Murnane Motors direct on 0755357411 and they will organize everything with you as the warranty on these turbo's is based with them being the manufacturing workshop.

:w00t: Jase

thats actually a good idea.

problem is, Slide doesnt want me to send the turbo to him at all. he doesnt want anything to do with it as far as i can tell. he's trying to shift responsibility.

i dont want to send my turbo to his warranting company because ive never dealt with them, or even knew about them to begin with, so how can i trust them?

if slide pays for the GCG quote of $75, pays for postage (not sure what it will cost), ill send it to HIM for him to take care of.

It appears that slide has used them to manufacture the turbo. Hence they had no contact with you but rather Slide was the middleman between you and them.

Murnane built it, so Murnane will fix it. Murnane answers to Slide, Slide answers to you. So ultimately Murnane is responsible for the turbo.

Slide is giving you the opportunity to send the turbo directly to them, rather than you send the turbo to slide, and slide then sends the turbo to Murnane. Its a waste of time and money to do that.

Give the info you have to Murnane to repair it, if that fails, then its refund time.

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Mate - I don't think anyone would deny that you have perhaps been hard done by here, but the fact of the matter is, if you want the warranty then you haven't got much choice. I think he is within his rights to ask you to send it to be repaired from the place of manufacture. This is not turbo (or car part)specific at all - it happens with a million and one items you purchase. You don't always get a choice.

Bottom line is, you bought a cheap turbo, it's faulty, the manufacturer is offering to fix it.

Unless you give them the opportunity to fix it - a full refund is a matter a good will on Slides part - nothing more.

Being biased towards GCG turbo's since i run one myself i would rather have them rebuild it, you've driven my car so you know how well it runs.

But since i know how much they are to rebuild and the fact that you shouldn't have to pay for it, it looks like your best bet is what others have said and get the warranty repair and have GCG check it out properly.

Sucks that you have 2 'reputable' turbo companies with different diagnosis' though....

yeah, ive decided that as long as sliding performance pays for GCG's time and postage that i'd send it to sliding performance personally. i will not send it to a company i have never heard off till now. i think that is being very reasonable.

I'd call Fair Trading to get some solid advice on the best way to proceed.

http://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.fairtrading.qld.gov.au/

website is down, but ill give them a call on monday.

thanks mate.

Spend a little more to begin with... do it right the first time imo.

how is that relevant to his situation?..he is asking for opinions as to what to do now, not what he should have done..

joe, my advice would be to send it to the warranty company with the list of repairs provided by GCG. Then, upon its return, ask GCG to inspect it again to see if it is A ok. Of course, these costs involved in shipping, re inspection will need to be forked out by somebody. Maybe you need to make some arrangment with SP here.

Cheers

Edited by moonus

how many other people are having this problem with this turbo?

If it is just a bit of a one off, i would let the said workshop repair the turbo as SP are asking. Then u can take ur chances with refitting it or paying to have gcg inspect it to see if it is indeed 100%

it might cost u a bit of time and money but this is the real world and its not always nice. warranties or garantees dont mean too much to me, unless i have faith in the product i just dont buy it. that is unless i can afford to lose the money, harsh but sometimes as others have said its best to spend money on proven($$) parts .

at the end of the day i dont have the money or the time, because time is money too, to take companies to court and stuff around like that.

and ive spent my 5c

gl

i personally know someone who had their slide turbo completely shit itself.

slide refuses to pay the GCG fee and postage even after he told me to send it there.

i think this is now going to develop into a court case. ive spoken to my old man who said i should go through with it.

ill have to contact the department of fair trading first, wont i?

slide can't do much more (under the current circumstances) than ask you to send it to Murnane to be repaired. i don't know what difference it makes whether you know them or not this is their attempt to meet their warranty obligations.

if you send it anywhere else it is your choice and your cost.

i would send it to Murnane and discuss GCG findings with them and let them fix it.

civil case is $26 to apply. department of fair trading is $0.

and i'll be sueing for all costs incurred including legal fees which will be around $1500ish because of labour etc.

its not a major loss on my part.

might be worth a shot then

the advice ill give tho is to send it where SP want you to, discuss with them what GCG have said and let them know when u get it back u will be sending it to GCG for another inspection and if it fails that u will be pursing legal action etc.

gl bud

Stuff the warranty, get a full refund.

If full refund isn't possible, then sue them for the full amount, its only fair.

You paid for a working turbo, no some half ass piece of shit like they supplied.

and i'll be sueing for all costs incurred including legal fees which will be around $1500ish because of labour etc.

I agree you should, its a waste of time on your behalf.

Why should you have to send it off to GCG to be repaired, you paid to get a new working turbo didn't you? Its also not like the damage was caused on your behalf or negligence.

Its already been sent off once, which to me already seems like 1 time to many.

Edited by abu

aaron has again disappointed me.

ive just received an email saying that he didnt want me to take it to GCG for them to strip the turbo, and this has voided my warranty.

i have no option than to sue, right?

aaron has again disappointed me.

ive just received an email saying that he didnt want me to take it to GCG for them to strip the turbo, and this has voided my warranty.

i have no option than to sue, right?

Well with your warranty voided, what good is it?

Its useless now!

Sue and get your money back..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...