Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not that i can afford 60-70k for a car, but if the opportunity came up to get a lease vehicle or company car.... 350Z are nice but just lacking that something for the money...i cant see the value in STI/EVOs so that leaves you with a Monaro (well by my pickings anyway)

This is the first attainable car that has come along for a while that i want...maybe even must have ;)

I have heard there are mules getting around Oz right now and will be available RHD

x06cc_ch089.jpg

x06cc_ch074.jpg

x06cc_ch083.jpg

x06cc_ch085.jpg

Thats goin to be the new camaro in america and theyre thinking of bringing it here and naming it a monaro.

Its not a VE SS.. i think it uses the same chassis but its got a 7 litre in it..i think its called the LS7.

but yer they look tough as but i dont think it looks like a monaro but definately a camaro.

Well i read there are a few on OZ at the moment undergoing driveline development...and that they will be avaiable RHD and to the Australian market. Im keen to see the pricing of them, im expecting it to be about the price of a 350Z since that its main competition in the states :(

holden are already taking deposits for them...

my uncle wants to get and and so does his mate so they have both put down there deposit and received a ticket for it (not sure if this just means they get first dibs on the car or if they get to order it in there choice of finish)

the convertable is porn!

Thats goin to be the new camaro in america and theyre thinking of bringing it here and naming it a monaro.

Its not a VE SS.. i think it uses the same chassis but its got a 7 litre in it..i think its called the LS7.

but yer they look tough as but i dont think it looks like a monaro but definately a camaro.

They'll have a range of engines no doubt, including the new 6.3L. They are deeloping a successor to the LS7, reported to have 600hp.

I like the new Dodge Challenger too. :down:

hmmm the misses is seriously pushing me for a stang.. but @ 40k yank $$$ there probably will not be any competition... unless they end up similarly priced oz $$ im shit out of luck... could try and push the misses toward it but highly doubtful!.

dont be too surprised when you find out it drives like a piece of crap, the interior feels like cheap shit, and besides the awesome look, you're left with a typical amercian heap of junk.

thats all i'd expect from them anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...