Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Howard's a lying smug fu(ktard, Rudd will be a lying smug fu(ktard.

Yeah the ecconomy might go to shit with Rudd but at what cost does it do well with Howard. Can't afford a house, inflation it at it highest ever....and tax cuts, what a fu(ken laugh, we get tax cuts, then people spend more, we are no better off. It's one big fu(ken scam.

DONKEH for the win!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3425946
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426096
Share on other sites

Howard.

We can't ratify Kyoto without severely disadvantaging ourselves in the global economy against higher polluters.

Ratifying Kyoto is simply a political point, and I completely agree with Howard's attitude to this.

If you've ever been in a business where idiots who do nothing, constantly mess up and basically fleece the employer because its so difficult to sack them you will be all for IR reforms.

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426122
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Hmm, interesting.

1. The Hawke/Keating government introduced the HECS (Higher Education Contribution Scheme) which means if you go to uni you pay the tax man. Plain & simple. O/S (full fee paying) student have been at our unis for many, many years. Good on them. Why should they be denied an education as well?

2. All politicians are liars. Plain & simple. Actually they are not. If you (or anyone else) had everything they ever said scrutinised & debated & misrepresented then you too (& me & everyone else) would be termed a liar. Rudd has the advantage of not having been around long enough to have piled up baggage.

3. Howard fkd up on the first change when they introduced the AWA's. But now that they have implemented a no disadvantage test covering the most important benifits you can't get little of no compensation for trading your penalty rates etc. Try working on a salary - you don't get any O/T, penalty rates or anything other than your salary. Not everyone works on wages or can even get access to AWA's.

4. Kyoto is a lame duck. Ratifying it will make bugger all difference. If Rudd had any bollocks he wouldn't be banging on about a target in 2050 - thats what four changes of government & 15 elections away. He would map out a short term target (say every year until 2020) & set out how he would achieve it. So would Howard. But they are both too gutless.

To finish: what I hate the most about this election is the me too, cloning that is going on in the policy areas. Weak as piss.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426134
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Wait, Labor is going to make uni spots free and stop international students? Where'd they say that and as if that makes any sense.

Rudd's not a liar though, hard to lie when you never answer a question.

You CANNOT be stripped of penalty rates, loading etc without compensation.

Rudd hasn't addressed anything, he's crapped on about studies that they commisioned that won't tell him anything until it will mean very little to this election. All he has done is made promises about carbon emissions when he'll most likely be dead.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...