Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok ok i'm in! I just wanna be on that flippin' list :wave:

I'll be cruising up with Assasin from Olympic Park.

And i'll be ordering extra cheese :laugh:

(Usted no es español)

Edited by R338OY

Other skylines coming with me:

Baby Blue R33

Wine Red R33

Silver R33

Charcoal R33

Black R34 *2

Silver R32 GTR

Black R32 GTR

White R33

There are a few more, but they are "maybe's" at this stage.

Ive got my roster, im working, but should be out of here by the time late news starts say 1030ish or 11 at the latest so ill call someone and come find yas... im sure youll be stopping so hopefully ill make it there for pizza.... :D

Other skylines coming with me:

Baby Blue R33

Wine Red R33

Silver R33

Charcoal R33

Black R34 *2

Silver R32 GTR

Black R32 GTR

White R33

There are a few more, but they are "maybe's" at this stage.

Nice... but you Do realize that this means pretty much bugger all unless you name names dude.. do these cars belong to people on here?

If so, i want all the red ones at the front... no wait.. the silver ones first.. then the rest... black ones can be at the back.

Also.. i hope you speak "sarcastish"

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...