Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After reading alot of threads, posts and infomation from PM's I'm left feeling like my mind is scattered in a thousand directions, kinda like the result of a bull in a china shop.

So I guess I'm after abit of direction.... what better place then here:)

MY GOAL :

RB26 DETT Built to be responsive and very punchy.

Very torque’y through the mid range.

It’s paramount for ENGINE to be reliable AND STRONG.

Its main use will be a street weapon

I currently have :

Tomei Poncams Type B 260 / 260 9.15 lift

Garrett 2860-r turbos

700cc sard inj's

040 bosh fuel pump - intank

Nismo Fuel reg

Apexi Power FC D-jettro

Spitfire coil packs

TRUST FMIC

Sard racing radiator

Full Dual racing N1 spec Kakimoto exhaust. Dual 75mm pipes back to each dump.

Apexi intake pipes and pods

ATM I'm favouring a RB26/30 hybrid for torque and powerband it enables the engine to have. Without having to do insane revs...

Although I have heard a 2.8HKS step 1 stroker kit is very good also...

Any advise from people who actually have such configurations in their GTR's or have some exp in dealing with such engine configerations.

Thanks in advance.

Rob

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192520-rb26-engine-choices/
Share on other sites

I don't have any personal experience with this since mine is still 2.6L, but if the 3L appeals to you, rather than using an RB30 bottom end (which isn't as strong as the RB26 due to lack of internal bracing), how about an OS Giken 3L kit? It actually uses a big spacer between the head and block, increasing the stroke and retaining the RB26 bottom end.

The HKS 2.8L kit would probably get you what you want if you had smaller turbos (from videos I've seen with 2530 or 2540 turbos) but the OS 3L would get the 28 series or larger turbos spooling much quicker to get your punchy torquey mid-range.

I would personally probably go the OS 3L or HKS 2.8L before a RB26/30 hybrid.

From what I've heard, a HKS V-Cam system (variable valve timing on inlet side) would help in that area also, but I don't know if you can actually get hold of one. On one of my Hot Version DVD's Keichi Tsuchia drives an R34 with it turned off and then turned on, and it made a big difference to the rate of acceleration. It had a TO4Z though.

Good points, but have you actually priced any of these components, i believe an OS 3 lt is in the vicinity of $30k, and the HKS v cam is about $8k, and i dont think its made anymore. If you have the budget, and dont want to stuff around, the stroker cranks are probably the way to go, as they are far simpler than an rb30 conversion

Edited by Adriano

if it was me the hks 2.8l kit would be the way to go, every hybrid rb30 ive seen in a gtr has been a disaster

they usualy foul on everything and have oil issues and alot of them leak oil because of the spacer block for the sump

just my 2 cents

thanx brett

i dont think the os giken 3ltr kit is anywhere near that price, i know otomoto in syd sells os giken stuff, ok i was wrong these things are farkin expensive not 30k but close enough to it here's the link http://www.otomoto.com.au/osgiken/RB30_race_engine.htm

3ltr is 23.500k and the 3.1 ltr kit is 25.500k

and as r32-25t said 3ltr in a gtr has its issues, add an extra 30mm to the top of the engine for the extra capacity and add another 10mm to the bottom of the engine for the spacer plate (only need the spacer plate if you run an rb30 block) you cant really go to far moving the engine up or down in a gtr cause of the front drive shafts, move them to much and you chew the front wheel bearings :)

if you went the os giken way you just have to worry bout the 30mm on the top of the engine, mayby just raise the bonnet a bit if you had clearance issue's so you didnt have to mess with the orientation of the drive shafts.

anyway if i had a gtr and was making this decision id go the hks 2.8 kit, good internals, cheaper than the os kit, not as much stuffing around with the hight etc

hope this helps :glare:

I don't have any personal experience with this since mine is still 2.6L, but if the 3L appeals to you, rather than using an RB30 bottom end (which isn't as strong as the RB26 due to lack of internal bracing), how about an OS Giken 3L kit? It actually uses a big spacer between the head and block, increasing the stroke and retaining the RB26 bottom end.

The HKS 2.8L kit would probably get you what you want if you had smaller turbos (from videos I've seen with 2530 or 2540 turbos) but the OS 3L would get the 28 series or larger turbos spooling much quicker to get your punchy torquey mid-range.

I would personally probably go the OS 3L or HKS 2.8L before a RB26/30 hybrid.

From what I've heard, a HKS V-Cam system (variable valve timing on inlet side) would help in that area also, but I don't know if you can actually get hold of one. On one of my Hot Version DVD's Keichi Tsuchia drives an R34 with it turned off and then turned on, and it made a big difference to the rate of acceleration. It had a TO4Z though.

For the record the Rb30 block is every bit as strong as the RB26, it doesn't lack internal bracing.

Take some time to read up on this forum about this combination and how good it is, you will be plesantly suprised.

there is one crucial part missing here. budget? how much do you want to spend (this will become the min) and how much can you spend (this is your max!).

I mean if money is no object then for me the choice would be:

new N1 or GT block

HKS S3 2.8

enlarged sump

tomei oil pump

HKS 2530s or T04Z

manifolds

dumps

fully ported head, with new springs etc

V-cam

bobs you're uncle but you are now $50K or so poorer.

After reading alot of threads, posts and infomation from PM's I'm left feeling like my mind is scattered in a thousand directions, kinda like the result of a bull in a china shop.

So I guess I'm after abit of direction.... what better place then here:)

MY GOAL :

RB26 DETT Built to be responsive and very punchy.

Very torque’y through the mid range.

It’s paramount for ENGINE to be reliable AND STRONG.

Its main use will be a street weapon

ATM I'm favouring a RB26/30 hybrid for torque and powerband it enables the engine to have. Without having to do insane revs...

Although I have heard a 2.8HKS step 1 stroker kit is very good also...

Any advise from people who actually have such configurations in their GTR's or have some exp in dealing with such engine configerations.

Thanks in advance.

Rob

Hi Rob,

I'm in the process of building an Rb30 bottom end for my bunky gtr. I started going down this path some years ago for pretty much the same reasons you are now looking at it.

Really the Rb30 setup gives you a fantastic rod ratio as well as more capacity, so if you build it right you can have a fair whack of an rpm range as well as capacity.

I'm dobbing Sydneykid in for some very good guidance on doing a decent 26/30 build ( PM box will fill shortly --- sorry mate).

Cheers

Dave

HKS no longer sell a Step 1 2.8l kit. Step 3 or nothing anyway. :worship: You might find a Step 1 second hand or old stock but people snap them up from what i've seen. Also you can have a brand new HKS V-Cam system landed for well under $4k forget that $8k price tag. Still mega dollars though.

I personally wouldn't touch a 26/30 hybrid with ten 10 foot poles joined together. A lot of other guys will say the exact opposite though and love them to bits. Each to their own.

For the record the Rb30 block is every bit as strong as the RB26, it doesn't lack internal bracing.

Take some time to read up on this forum about this combination and how good it is, you will be plesantly suprised.

I wasn't saying it wasn't any good, just not AS good.

Just going off info I have read on these forums and magazines, I was lead to believe that the RB26 block had extra internal bracing to handle second (or third? can't remember) order harmonics present in the high end of the rev range (not entirely sure what revs, but somewhere around 8000). The RB30 was never meant to rev past about 7000, so as long as you don't go that far, the extra bracing probably isn't be needed. The RB26 however is designed to rev to over 8000 where second order harmonics are present, so the extra bracing was added to handle it, even as far as 10,000. The same can not be expected with an RB30 block.

Now I don't pretend to know much about engine harmonics, I'm just regurgitating what I've read, so if any of that is off, I'm qhite happy to have it staightened for me :huh:

Edited by EVIL TWIN
there is one crucial part missing here. budget? how much do you want to spend (this will become the min) and how much can you spend (this is your max!).

I mean if money is no object then for me the choice would be:

new N1 or GT block

HKS S3 2.8

enlarged sump

tomei oil pump

HKS 2530s or T04Z

manifolds

dumps

fully ported head, with new springs etc

V-cam

bobs you're uncle but you are now $50K or so poorer.

If funds were unlimited this is waht I would do. The HKS ultimate street car ran this setup with a T04Z and looked amazingly powerful and very driveable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...