Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

perhaps some of the businesses who do well from the car enthusiast market should fund bill board advertisements saying fixed speed camera in this area and put them up near where the cameras are.

...in a perfect world

Edited by Atomic Playboy
  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

well i guess if they issue fines for 1km/h over the speed limit then a few regular rolling blockades at 10km/h during rush hour would get them to think about it. then again if they could think we would never be having these posts anyway

I want GPS coordinates for them all...

Also does anyone have more info on these 1km/h tolerances? Its not that i wouldn't believe it, but 1 km/h is a bit gestapo, I guess I just want to see it for myself, and all google is giving me is more forum talk about it, no solid quotes... I am woundering if its just the transport minister using scare-tactics?

It will probablly get burnt (petrol bombed) within a week :blink:

its only fair, who builds a purpose built 3 lane fast way then puts a farken camera on it....in 15yrs living here i have never ever seen a crash on that stretch not one since the old bay brige was built

more info on the 1 km/h statements? Are you all sure they dont just mean its accurate to within 1 km/h?

The lidar guns are accurate to 2 km/h as are the mobile vans, and in dash are 2km/h stationary and 3km/h moving, but they dont ping until higher speeds?

Guys, the best defence will be to just drag it to the courts whenever you get a fine. I know their equipment is not calibrated IAW the National Measurements Act 1960 and all you have to do is prove reasonable doubt and no Court in their right mind could find you guilty. It may cost a few bucks and some time off but it is easy if you get the info from the Aussie speeding fines website. Their equipment might test in perfect conditions in a lab to be as accurate as stated but simple operator errors and false returns will make them wildly inaccurate. I used a LIDAR that measured a speed sign 38m away as being 67m. They are handheld ones that are wildly inaccurate at over 70m due to hand shake and the large beam width which is 1m wide at 100m so it just needs to pick up other returns and a false will read.

Imagine our courts if they are filled with low range speeding offenders sending a message? No real crimes could be dealt with.

They stick out like a dogs balls. Not only that, but the marker lines that you drive over are very visable. Id say they are a good way to gauge speed in the camera, to make it very difficult to take to court - they seem to be in 50 cm incriments with every few meters marked, eg:

_

-

-

-

-

_

so when they take the photo, they can say photo taken at X time, and since detection your vehicle had moved X distance to cover X amount of lines on the road, therefore you were traveling at X speed

Which chucks the calibration arguement down the potty...

Yeah, they do stand out pretty well... And the signage for the burpengary one is everywhere...

There are signs that say "Speed camera ahead" about 1km out, then another set of signs that say "speed camera 24hours" and then 500m later there is the speed camera...

The markings Ian are exactlly 1m apart with a larger strike every 5m's...

They are also spread out differentlly across the 3 lanes so the camera can grab anyone from all three lanes... Their set on that angle for the cameras benifit...

As for do they work, well yesterday afternoon on my way to Morayfield a guy/girl in a little yaris went down the 3rd lane at approx 120ish while everyone else was just sitting on 98-100kph as we all read the signs approaching the speed cameras, then as the driver crossed over the lines about 100-200m in front of me his/her number plate flashed light 3 times.

So 3 photos are taken with this new speed camera system...

As Ian said with the evidence of the lines in the photos these things are going to accurate to within a 1km varience...

Now where the confusion is;

Police and the transport minister stated these units are "Accurate to within 1km per hour" meaning they are dead accurate. This did not mean you would get a fine for 101 in a 100 zone. After speaking with a good mate whos works in a un-related branch of qld police he could not confirm but he said youwill find they are set to trigger at 107kph. As this is what the mobile speed camera units operate off, their general rule of thumb is 7% tollerance at higher than 50kph and 10% tollerance at anthing lower.

He did say this is only a general rule and that this is what they set the mobile units to. So he admits he does not know for sure, but believes that the old rules would still apply in this case...

So there you go :)

EDIT: Now in saying that the smartest thing to do it trave along, then as you approach the camera make 100% certain your under the speed limit...

Actually it doesn't Ian.

What they suggest may sound good, but until they come up with proper NMA1960 Sec10 compliant certification for the timing mech or measuring component, and use something better than the MD5 algorithm to prove the image hasn't been tampered with which I'm certain they will use then the system doesn't meet basic scrutiny for evidence.

Here is an interesting condensation from some recent reading regarding state laws and the NMA compliance....

The Commonwealth Law supersedes the state law in all cases.

In 1995 a case was seen where a tool was used to measure Lobster that was undersize and a case for prosecution made. The state law said it was fine but NMA1960 said it wasn't as it hadn't been tested and certified by NATA or CSIRO, the only organisations that can, so the evidence was ruled inadmissible. Sounds like precedent to me.

So unless every piece of equipment is certified and in test then any evidence from it is inadmissible. This includes the operator.

I'm not for wholesale speeding, just against the money grab by state govts in the name of road safety.

Oh and I agree with Col on making sure you are under the limit when passing these piles of poo. They will make mistakes, and it helps to state you were travelling under the limit as you knew they were there in your court case. Anything to raise doubt.

Technology in never infallible.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys, just spotted what seems to be a fixed speed camera on the pacific motorway around the marshal road exit out bound. It's looks like it's targeting inbound but maybe for both directions. Looks like they only just fitted it.

Pretty sure there is one on the Pac Highway around marchal road but it is not active till later in the year, They mentioned one in the paper and on the tele a few weeks ago that would be active mid year

On speeding camera fines and the gov allowance for over the limit, I have never heard of one lower than 71 in a 60 does anyone else have one lower than that?

Yes. 65 in a 60 zone, Melbourne.

My son scored, didn't realise, and he'd gone O/S by the time it arrived, so I paid it.

Turns out his bloody hire car was set on cruise control at 60, just to be safe.

Didn't work out though.

Interesting point. Qld Transport claims 14% of fatals are caused by over the limit speeding (not to be confused with under the limit speeding eg. too fast for the conditions. There is such a thing) where overseas data and our research states that it is closer to 2%. Take out the drunked and drugged, joyriders in stolen cars and the odd idiot running from the police and that figure drops drastically.

Saving lives, I don't think so.

Training is the only answer.

Yes Geof, you and i know that training is the answer, but exactly what training is the government providing? Nothing

I wouldn't mind doing a training/test course everytime i renew my license, to make sure i'm up to speed with new rules etc. if it takes a day who gives a shit. At least then we would have a go at some basic driver training.

What would it involve? That would need to be sorted out but i think a good starting point is;

dry braking in a straight line to stop before a set point

wet braking in a straight line to stop before a set point

dry braking avoiding an obstacle

wet braking avoiding an obstacle

dry, two direction changes avoiding obstacle

wet, two direction changes avoiding an obstacle

dry constant radius circle- slowly build up speed so can no longer maintain radius

wet constant radius circle

parallel park

hill start

and my absolute favourite, learning to count! Yes count people, it seems there are a number that cant count to 2 seconds- you know a good MINIMUM time to travel behind the car in front of you to gives a reasonable buffer. This costs nothing and is my pet peeve, i just laugh at cars sitting maybe 2 car-lengths behind the car in front. I have pretty good hand eye co-ordination and reaction time, but i wouldn't have a hope in hell in normal circumstances be able to avoid hitting the car in front if for some reason they decided to brake suddenly.....feel better now.

I'm sure other people would welcome the opportunity to add to what they think would be good techniques to practice.

At the end of the day, you owe it t yourself and other people on the road to be safe, capable drivers.

I'll leave you with this thought, the Air Force spends around 15 months teaching people to fly, i am involved with this. At the culmination of this lengthy and difficult training, the final check we do is ask ourselves-and this is subjective; would you be happy sending your wife and kids in a aeroplane flown by this individual?

I know i certainly wouldn't put my wife and kids in a car picked at random on the roads, because i have no idea what skills or training they might have. At least with a standard course like something outlined above, you would know that they have had at least some training before being let loose on our roads.

Flame away

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...