Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They aren't anything special. Just Project Mu sized for a 33 R. The fronts only weigh 0.5 kg heavier for the pair than the rears. But you can't get any hatted back rotors for sensible money. Also the vanes on the rear are, for whatever reason, more substantial & numerous than for the fronts. No idea why that is but I stopped asking such questions after I got sick of the local stuff cracking.

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

djr81, which one did you buy and where from? and most importantly.... how much?! thanks mate. :)

I bought:

Nissan Brake Master Cylinder R32 GTR (46010-05U02): 36,100 yen

Shipping: 3,700 yen (to WA probably cheaper to over east)

From Greenline. I didn't think it was that cheap but it got sent quickly, to my door & in retrospect: BARGAIN.

Did the calipers turn up yet? I didnt get a chance to clean them up before packing :D They will come up pretty good with a spit and a polish...at least this way you get to see the true condition as they come off my car (lol, poor excuse for being lazy

Not yet mate. Usually takes 2 full weeks for stuff to arrive. WA being so remote & all. :) So at best today, probably next week.

Forgot to ask you about hoses. Are the threads etc same as for ordinary Skyline Brembos?

Pharken Japanese holidays means I didn't get my usual email from *insert random name of Japanese parts supplier here* telling me the rims are a further 2 weeks delayed. So I will have plenty of time to bling up the callipers.

so you got the r32 v-spec one? Is it any differnt in size externally i.e will the cusco m/s stopper work with it

Yes. As far as I can tell other than the casting marks on the side & part number there are no external differences between the two units. So I expect the Cusco stopper to work the same.

so you got the r32 v-spec one? Is it any differnt in size externally i.e will the cusco m/s stopper work with it

My 17/16 (BM57) fit my Cusco stopper and was externally dimensionally the same at the std item. Hope that helps.

from what i've read on here somwhere the r33 gts-t bms is smaller than the r32 gts-t. so i don't think it would be an upgrade to the gtr

My 17/16 (BM57) fit my Cusco stopper and was externally dimensionally the same at the std item. Hope that helps.

my r33 bm57 was the same as the pov pack r32 one, just wondering why cusco exclude v-specs in there stoppers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...