Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So considering that my nicely tuned RB25NEO will ping on anything less than 98 octane, which one do you think I should use?

Seriously though, I'll bet the second two cars in that video aren't actually supposed to run less than 96 octane fuel (manufacturer specs) so the findings weren't surprising there either.

Skylines are designed to run over 100RON fuel (available in japan)...so running 91 octane fuel (regular unleaded) in your skyline is not a very good idea in my opinion. The extra few $$ not only gives you more power and better economy (not necessarily the case with cars not intended for premium fuel), its also very cheap insurance for your engine :P

As for the difference between optimax and ultimate, I'd say that varies between cars and even if the cars are the same model and everything. :)

For what its worth I use BP ultimate...but the main thing is that you choose one and stick with it because you'll only get the best from it if you continue to use the same fuel and not mix it with others.

Edited by pixel8r
So considering that my nicely tuned RB25NEO will ping on anything less than 98 octane, which one do you think I should use?

Seriously though, I'll bet the second two cars in that video aren't actually supposed to run less than 96 octane fuel (manufacturer specs) so the findings weren't surprising there either.

Skylines are designed to run over 100RON fuel (available in japan)...so running 91 octane fuel (regular unleaded) in your skyline is not a very good idea in my opinion. The extra few $$ not only gives you more power and better economy (not necessarily the case with cars not intended for premium fuel), its also very cheap insurance for your engine :wave:

snap! couldn't agree more

these topics have been done to death too :worship:

I remember someone saying that Japan's RON rating system is different to Australia's. Their 100ron is equivalent to our 98ron. Can someone confirm?

I always thought that japan's fuel was more like 106RON. All the same, I think america's fuel uses a different RON rating - not sure about japan though.

I just know the higher the octane rating the better. They run great on 98RON and 100RON here in australia so not much to worry about. :)

Just thought I'd also mention - the reason for the low difference in the cars in the video is that those cars were all built for export markets - in this case, the UK. This means that the cars are designed to run on the fuels that are available in that country, and tuned for the same.

The difference with skylines etc is that they were not intended for any market outside of japan and so they are only designed for japanese premium fuel. A skyline would've seen even more difference between the fuels than the 3 cars in the video...

As a side note, I believe the UK did actually import skylines at one stage, but i'm not sure if these were modified in any way to suit UK emissions laws etc.

lmao call a current affair :P .... seriusly, there are soooo many variables to consider it is impossible to run a test like that. oh and its not just RON that makes fuel better it oxygen content etc.. i use ethanol based (e10 i think , 98ron with a high oxygen content) in my 33 because its my daily and i cbf getting it tuned (the higher oxy content leans the fuel mixture out a little, even though the ecu would offset this somehow ).

I remember someone saying that Japan's RON rating system is different to Australia's. Their 100ron is equivalent to our 98ron. Can someone confirm?

rubbish. my car (stock) pings on 98 RON, on 100 RON it is beautiful. jap fuel is definitely 100 RON or better.

Well if Wikipedia is right, which is not all the time:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

Japan and Aus are probably using the same ratings for Fuel, Japan just gets better fuel :)

So the "myth" (as this thread suggests) is not a myth after all.

Keep using 98 octane or higher fuels people. :)

Dont use 91 octane regular unleaded just because some guy in the uk with a renault clio said it makes no difference.

The manufacturer recommends 98-100RON (or higher, whatever they have in japan) so go with that.

Nothing new here...move along.

I agree to stick with the 98 RON. The reason why we here in Australia can get away with 98 instead of 100 RON, is due to our altitude. Pretty much all of Aus is pretty close to sea level cause its such a flat country. Japan is generally a lot higher. At higher altitudes, you need a slightly higher RON (ie 100 RON) to make up for the thinner air and therefore less oxygen content. I wouldn't go less than 98 as lower may ping in Australia, but I reckon in the high mountains in Japan, 98 would still ping.

I always thought that japan's fuel was more like 106RON. All the same, I think america's fuel uses a different RON rating - not sure about japan though.

I just know the higher the octane rating the better. They run great on 98RON and 100RON here in australia so not much to worry about. :(

Just thought I'd also mention - the reason for the low difference in the cars in the video is that those cars were all built for export markets - in this case, the UK. This means that the cars are designed to run on the fuels that are available in that country, and tuned for the same.

The difference with skylines etc is that they were not intended for any market outside of japan and so they are only designed for japanese premium fuel. A skyline would've seen even more difference between the fuels than the 3 cars in the video...

As a side note, I believe the UK did actually import skylines at one stage, but i'm not sure if these were modified in any way to suit UK emissions laws etc.

where do you get 100ron fuel from?????? and i use shell V power 98ron since there is a shell near my place.

Edited by slverbullet
where do you get 100ron fuel from?????? and i use shell V power 98ron since there is a shell near my place.

shell vpower racing (previously called optimax extreme or something). It contains 5% ethanol as far as I know.

not to be confused with the normal shell vpower which is 98RON and contains no ethanol.

What a joke. To say regular unleaded at ~91 Octane is equivalent to 98 Octane fuel is that full of it it's not even funny. BP ultimate for me thanks!

Cheers,

That clip was from Fifth Gear in the UK, where regular is 95RON.... In Australia regular petrol is an even lower 91RON, so the difference between Regular (91) and High Octane (98) would be more pronounced in Australia. But also, as mentioned in this thread most skylines would ping terribly on 91 let alone 95...

On a practical sense fellas... I can actually feel the difference - I personally like Shell's V-Power... runs heaps better as opposed to something like 91 Octane petrol... so I guess it's worth the extra buck.

Here's what the Pom's think of Shell's so-called "super fuel" V-Power...

http://www.japmobiles.com/news/news_detail.asp?id=245

91RON and 98RON, with the timing set to handle the 91RON? Of course you're not going to get that much effect (though there will be some, 98 still burns better, the timing just isn't set up to take advantage of it).

But with 98RON you can put more timing in (either manually, more commonly automatically by the ECU these days) and get a whole lot more economy/power out of it. The opposite being the reason why 91RON pings, because the timing is too far advanced and is causing preignition.

I see 95RON becoming a thing of the past here in australia, with a lot of euro/jap cars coming over requiring 98RON.

I see 95RON becoming a thing of the past here in australia, with a lot of euro/jap cars coming over requiring 98RON.

Most Euro and Jap cars are built for 98RON fuel or more, but most owners don't realise this and still fill up with 91RON. I guess if they don't thrash the car everywhere then it should be alright for now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...