Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow I can't believe your putting NOS in. I doubt it will make 200kw...well not at the wheels anyway.

The bad thing about some NOS systems is they're not progressive and come on too strongly, 75hp sounds alright.

If you insist on staying N/A and not going FI, bang for your buck - cams and power fc ... it would make the engine much more elastic in the rev range, might lose a bit of bottom end depending on what cams you going.

Little concerned about the placment of the NOS jet Cara, being in only one side of the two intakes you may not get an even distribution to all cylinders. As a general rule of thumb they should always be at least 6 to 8 inches before the throttle body for an even distribution to all cylinders.

I was at High tech dyno today fiddling with the fueling on the dyno as my tune was alittle too rich, just on idle chatter about various cars with one of the tuners, your atmo Nitrous+PFC subject came up and coincidentally I see the topic here today.

Very interesting to say the least, good luck with everything :)

true but go race a turbod car. :)

See how it goes.

why? i don't like the smug tone of your post.

race your car against an F430, see how it goes.

this is the naturally aspirated section and more specifically cara's thread about her nitrous progress... please keep it on topic.

why? i don't like the smug tone of your post.

race your car against an F430, see how it goes.

this is the naturally aspirated section and more specifically cara's thread about her nitrous progress... please keep it on topic.

You got the wrong tone.

I'm pretty sure i read clearly that this is the NA section also, what this thread is on.

I'd be more than happy to go up against a F430. Wouldn't you want to try?

Have i said something off topic? I was just saying to take it against a turbod car and see how the nos goes.

I wasn't saying, that this idea was stupid and that putting it up against a turbo it still would have no chance.

Geez.

if that's the case then i take back my comment and offer my apologies.

very often we get people in here who preach 'turbo'. reading your post in different light, i agree - that would be a test to try out. however where do you draw the line in terms of comparison? same power output or same amout of money spent?

with what you said, going head to head with a mild GTSt/GTT would be evenly matched - driver pending.

CARA!

YOU SAID YOU WONT BE STINGY ON THE PICS!

:nyaanyaa:

Hows she go?

agree with john. i think 3 & 4 would get a larger amount of nitrous than the others.

direct port injection :w00t:

I dont think so.. The pistons cause vacume and hence suction at different times.. the valves will be open to allow the piston to create suction and taking in the bulk of the NOS. Because not all 6 cyl's are creating suction at the same time ther isnt much "comptetiton" from others. Residue may be left near cylinders 3 and 4. But they wont be getting significantly more NOS than the others..

Not sure if this makes sence.. cos I have a feeling it dosnt..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...