Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Porsche specs

power 357.9 kw / 480 bhp @ 6000 rpm

bhp/weight 302.84 bhp per weight

torque 620 nm / 457.3 ft lbs @ 1950 rpm

weight 1588 kg / 3500 lbs

top speed 310.6 kph / 193 mph

0 - 60 mph 3.6 seconds

0 - 1/4 mile 11.9 seconds

GT-R Specs

power 352.7 kw / 473 bhp @ 6400 rpm

bhp/weight 275.0 bhp per weight

torque 588.42 nm / 434 ft lbs @ 3200 to 5200rpm rpm

weight 1720 kg / 3792 lbs

top speed 310.6 kph / 193 mph

0 - 60 mph 3.5 seconds

0 - 1/4 mile 11.7 seconds

Me and my brother were talking about this yesterday. Now when you think about this in terms of 1/4 mile alone it comes down to power to weight really with two cars like this that are both 4wd. So unless nissan are fudging there 0-60 and 1/4mile times, how can it be so fast?

Could nissan be lying about the power output of the car?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197442-how-is-the-r35-gt-r-so-fast/
Share on other sites

In a recent carpoint article Motor's David Morley managed 0-100kmh in 4.0 (and they said it would be hard to do much better), but they managed a 0-400m time of 12.1 while hitting the 180kmh limiter before they reached the 400m point. So it is definitely an 11 second car.

the numbers don't add up to me either, but then we don't know what revs the launch control launches from - maybe it launces from redline?

Me and my brother were talking about this yesterday. Now when you think about this in terms of 1/4 mile alone it comes down to power to weight really with two cars like this that are both 4wd.

No, acceleration times come down to power to weight and gearing. Its been discussed in this subforum before.

It's the gearbox. fast shifts are easy now.

Porsche has semi-auto gearbox option aswell...

No, acceleration times come down to power to weight and gearing. Its been discussed in this subforum before.

That forum really goes into no detail at all, just fools and there own opinions... gearing shmearing.. maybe if the cars were almost the same weight.. but they are approx 150kg difference.. thats like two cars racing 1 with 3 ppl in it the other with 1.

That and the Porsche are a manual box with a clutch. The GTR is DSG, it can change gears much quicker, which in turn will keep boost pressure between gearshifts and pull away.

Nope porsche 997 911 T offers a semi-auto box. the times i have quoted are from that semi-auto option which is the fastest porsche

witchcraft.

This makes the most sense to me.. im going to have to agree wit you.

I say its either not as fast as nissan claims, or there fudging the power figures.. its just not possible

Has anyone read the specs from the Official Nissan Global site ? Anyway the VR38 is indicated as a 'net' power figure (in car) of 480 hp or 353 kw. The footnote indicates that this is approx. 15% lower than the 'Gross' power (engine only). If this is correct the bhp is actually closer to 560 hp for engine only. Just thought I'd point this out as nobody seems to have mentioned this on any of the forums.

Cheers

The URL is http://press.nissan-global.com/PRESSKIT/NI...LISH/index.html

to check this out yourself in the specs part

Edited by BK
Has anyone read the specs from the Official Nissan Global site ? Anyway the VR38 is indicated as a 'net' power figure (in car) of 480 hp or 353 kw. The footnote indicates that this is approx. 15% lower than the 'Gross' power (engine only). If this is correct the bhp is actually closer to 560 hp for engine only. Just thought I'd point this out as nobody seems to have mentioned this on any of the forums.

Cheers

The URL is http://press.nissan-global.com/PRESSKIT/NI...LISH/index.html

to check this out yourself in the specs part

exactly, since when was the 32/33/34 GTR even remotely 280hp?

In car manufactures terms, doing quick times with massive hp isn't showcasing a company's ability. Doing Porsche beating times with "only" 480hp demonstrates one hell of a design.

I wouldn't be surprised if these cars did 420ish awhp straight from the factory.

Well gearing and power band can also have something to do with it, having said that i imagine the Porsche power band would be just as good if not better than the GTR.

But yes cans can be geared for acceleration or cruise. Not sure what the gearing difference is between them both.

Well gearing and power band can also have something to do with it, having said that i imagine the Porsche power band would be just as good if not better than the GTR.

The Top Gear article says the Porsche's engine is a little more flexible, probably because of the VGT since the displacement is about the same.

The Top Gear article says the Porsche's engine is a little more flexible, probably because of the VGT since the displacement is about the same.

I say this has alot to do with it

torque 620 nm / 457.3 ft lbs @ 1950 rpm

Dont get me wrong for bringing this article up, this car is practically my favourite car, its performance for the price and practicality of the car is truelly unmatched. The main reason im bringing it to light is because i believe that the car is actually making more power than nissan claim.

Remember in japan, although the gentlemens agreement has long since expired, car manufacturers are still urged not to create super powerful cars that can reach extreme speeds.

This is the first japanese car that truelly goes beyond the 206kw barrier

Porsche has semi-auto gearbox option aswell...

That forum really goes into no detail at all, just fools and there own opinions... gearing shmearing.. maybe if the cars were almost the same weight.. but they are approx 150kg difference.. thats like two cars racing 1 with 3 ppl in it the other with 1.

Nope porsche 997 911 T offers a semi-auto box. the times i have quoted are from that semi-auto option which is the fastest porsche

This makes the most sense to me.. im going to have to agree wit you.

I say its either not as fast as nissan claims, or there fudging the power figures.. its just not possible

Porsche doesn't offer a "semi-auto" box that you seem so certain of. Porsche offer a traditional 6 speed manual, and an AUTOMATIC gearbox in the 997 Turbo, as in, a slush box. It has "tiptronic" operation, but in no way is it even remotely similar to GTR's DSG gearbox, or for that matter Ferrari and other's paddle shift manuals.

The Porsche Turbo "tiptronic" is quicker accelerating from standstill than the manual yes, mainly due to the ability to load up the torque convertor, spooling the variable geaometry turbos whilst at standstill.

GTR's performance can partly be put down to the exceptionally quick shifts of DSG style boxes (it's actually pre-selected the next gear, and is just waiting for the shift paddle to be pulled to change). This would go someway toward achieving those times, but I'm still sceptical that they can be repeated in the real world.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...