Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I was installing the HID kit yesterday for my low beam headlight (H1)

I'm not sure if I did everything correctly and the lights don't seem to be as bright as they claimed.

Well basically i took out the old globes, replaced them with the xenon bulbs that's connected to the ballast

and also connected the ballast to the +ve and -ve terminals of the low beam assembly.

Now I still have from the HID kit, a set of wires all connected together.

there's a red +ve terminal wire, a black -ve terminal wire, a fuse, two other wires(one black and one white)

and two connectors which are supposedly for the ballasts.

There is an instruction diagram that says 'H4 Hi/Lo Beam installation' where you need to use these set of wires,

but there's also another diagram titled 'Circuit Diagram' which only shows what I've done so far.

So I'm a little bit confuzzled, can anyone tell me if I need to use those set of wires and fuse for the HID installation?

Also I hear this little noise that the ballast makes when you turn the lights on.

Thanks in advanced, hope I've wrote everything as clear as possible.

I'll post some pics up tomorrow of the wiring I've done

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199302-r33-hid-install-help/
Share on other sites

i jus did my HID kit yesterday as well..

if you have turned it on and they work, you wouldve installed it correctly. the brightness level would be dependant on the HID kit.

ive got the buzz noise too from the ballast, im pretty sure thats normal.

Sounds like you got the most confusing HID kit out there.

HID kit are piss easy to install.

RED lead power

BLACK lead earth thats all there should be.

Connect the black lead to the earth on your headlight and the red to the back of the bulb then red and black to the ballast

Done.

Also 10,000k should be REALLY blue!

I had 8,000k in mine and was too blue IMO

So now just using the standard halogen bulbs.

EDIT: I have never heard any ballast buzzing.Sounds like a poor quality kit to me.

The extra cables are there incase the way you connected it now doesn't work. If it turns on, it should be fine and that the brightness of the lights are because of the kit.

I just think you should take the kit out altogether. Reflectors with the HID kit will produce HEAPS of glare and hot spots.

The extra cables are there incase the way you connected it now doesn't work. If it turns on, it should be fine and that the brightness of the lights are because of the kit.

I just think you should take the kit out altogether. Reflectors with the HID kit will produce HEAPS of glare and hot spots.

couldn't agree more, take the HID lights out, i had them and i had the same problem not enough light, i went out and bought phillips bluevision which work wonders, most people only use the hid's for looks and not for seeing, sell the HID's and spend $60 at your local autobarn and buy phillips bluevision

if the HID you install is not brighter then a halogen bulb its either because

1) you installed it incorrectly and not aligned properly

2) you got a HIGH Kelvin range (10000 or something) it is HEAPS BRIGHT but cant see far thats why 6000k is recommended for street use not just for "looks"

ok think I might switch to the 6000K or 8000K bulbs

though they do look alot nicer, I'd like a little bit more visibility

specially as I got tinted windows,

I thought the HIDs would counter the limited amount of light that I can see.

Edited by POLICE

Generally, the higher the Kelvin, the brighter they are but the less penetration of light.

The new BMWs you see getting around have 4800k sets, and are for lack of better explanation a 'step up' from halogens.

I have 6000k in my car, and they are superb (true white, with the faintest of blue tinge), mind you my friend (owns an r33, bloody plastic light covers) has the same, but they don't look as bright

The fact that your work means that they are plugged in correctly, it might just be that your globes burn cooler or something. We even installed a set of 12000k with little difference.

They only really go purplish around 30000k and eventually they go ultraviolet.

But I digress, 6000k are more than enough for near everyone. Be careful with the higher ones, since the police don't seem to like them (they're illegal in W.A at least)

Handy hint: if your plastic headlight covers are yellowing and scratched, give them a rub with some metal polish, they'll come up heaps better

  • 2 weeks later...

12000k is purplish but still very white.

To look at directly they are piercing bright, but it's all about the PENETRATION (heh)

Uber bright they may be, but anything above 6000k is near useless for driving in the dark as the light doesn't go as far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...