Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well there are weight classes

60kg, 67.5kg, 75kg, 82.5kg, 90kg, 100kg, 110kg, 125kg, 140kg, 140kg+. You must way UNDER the weight

Our best lifters

75kg class - Emad Nayef 220kg squat, 125 bench(injured, has done 150kg) and 260kg deadlift, in competition, best total 602.5kg (35yo)

82.5kg class - Martin Nguyen 227.5kg squat, 132.5kg bench press , deadlift 272.5kg, best total 632.5kg (teen, 19)

90kg class - Max Markopoulos 250kg squat, 155kg bench, 245kg deadlift, best total 650kg (20yo)

140kg+ - Jack Pollard 280kg squat, 185kg bench, 280kg deadlift, best total 745kg 21yo)

All 4 lifters have lifted more in the gym, but these are comp results only

Sweet! Gives something to aspire to! How many years they been training for?

Well, Jack is 21, he walked into PTC on June 10 2010, it was the first time he'd been to a gym. So he squatted 300kg in a little over 2 years.

Max and Martin both started lifting at 15, so 5 years all up. Max only started powerlifting in April 2010, before that it was lifting for Soccer and Basketball, Martin simply trained at home until 10 months ago

Emad did his first comp in December 2011, he had been lifting weights for football

I think there is a video on my YouTube channel of Max at 16 powercleaning 100kg@67kg or something like that, I'll try and find it

Markos dont let TTT see your post below about training at home being simple:

"Max and Martin both started lifting at 15, so 5 years all up. Max only started powerlifting in April 2010, before that it was lifting for Soccer and Basketball, Martin simply trained at home until 10 months ago"

It could be misread to make us beleive that training in a gym has actually been of benefit.... *shock*.... *gasp*

:-)

Tolga knows Martins story. Martin trained at home for 3 years, when he walked into PTC at Xmas 2011, his total as we tested it was 520kg

In June 2012 he totalled 632.5kg at Nats, so 112.5kg in 6 months is good when youre already strong

Martin went from 180/120/220 to 227.5/132.5/272.5. He missed his 3rd attempt bench which he made in the gym of 140kg, so it couldve been better

He has since benched 152.5kg

Martin got strong at home, then broke the Teen 82.5kg Class WR by over 100kg when he switched to a proper PL gym

He's a great kid and an excellent dancer lol

FFS someone please ban markos... or at least stop him posting videos of skinny kids lifting more than me lol

This. My balls are being broken not having a PTC here in Canberra right now. SO MUCH WANT.

It could be misread to make us beleive that training in a gym has actually been of benefit.... *shock*.... *gasp*

:-)

Right.

You think that if Martin trained at fitness first or your gym that he would have had the same results?

Lol

The word gym means different things to different people.

Don't try to make out that I said everyone should train at home.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...