Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i dont normally take a pre workout simply because I have never noticed a difference in the past when I have taken them.

only gave this one a try as the guy gave me a whole bunch of samples.

didnt read into the marketing. GAT does market a bit like that, but I have read good things about their products.

end of the day it was a sample, I gave it a go and first test was a good one. I have 3 or 4 more samples of it which I will try and report back on.

so these are the claims;

1)SUPER-INTENSIFIED ENERGY*
2)CLINICALLY PROVEN PRO-TESTOSTERONE*
3)REACTIVE HYPEREMIA (MUSCLE PUMPS)*
4)DMAE INFUSED, MIND-IN-THE-MUSCLE FOCUS*
5) ROAD MAP VASODILATION*

What it actually means

1) It's got some calories
2) Doesn't raise testosterone beyond normal or at all in the case of a healthy person (hence not illegal)
3) So what
4) placebo
5) Only applicable if you are lean. If you are a juiced up body builder you have what you need already.
yet another 'short cut' promise that tastes like apples.

so these are the claims;

1)SUPER-INTENSIFIED ENERGY*
2)CLINICALLY PROVEN PRO-TESTOSTERONE*
3)REACTIVE HYPEREMIA (MUSCLE PUMPS)*
4)DMAE INFUSED, MIND-IN-THE-MUSCLE FOCUS*
5) ROAD MAP VASODILATION*

What it actually means

1) It's got some calories
2) Doesn't raise testosterone beyond normal or at all in the case of a healthy person (hence not illegal)
3) So what
4) placebo
5) Only applicable if you are lean. If you are a juiced up body builder you have what you need already.
yet another 'short cut' promise that tastes like apples.

In my experience with Bulk Nutrients' Cognitone PWO, DMAE is more or less the only thing in it that I notice a very distinct benefit from. It's just another analogue of DMAA I believe, and DMAA gave me a very noticeable increase in mental focus....so I guess I'm saying in my opinion, it's far from a placebo.

Like t-boosters. Most only raise your test by 42%. An increase of well over 200% is needed for any real muscular results

I disagree Tom, please stop spreading unfounded misinformation like this.

They raise it by 48%. Get it right.

  • Like 1

dollar for dollar, injecting test would be much cheaper when actual effects are concerned lol

Step 1 - engage in dat dere sexy time 5 times in one day

Step 2 - go to doc, say you can't get it up, request blood test to analyse t-levels

Step 3 - t-levels come back lower than normal (yeah you knew this would happen; inb4 sabotage)

Step 4 - get prescribed test therapy and reap the reward of dem gainz for cheap

might as well cut to the chase and start pinning.

Speaking of which, do pro powerlifters use gear? Probably a Markos question, not judging, genuinely curious.

In an untested federation? Probably. In any competitive environment where people devote their lifestyle towards a cause, you can be sure people will be doing everything they can to get the best out of themselves and get an edge on competition. People do it in tested environments like the Olympics; I don't see why they wouldn't in a situation where it is legal. I would if it was my sport.

Every 2nd guy (ok maybe 3rd guy) in my gym is on the gear. Most are happy to admit it too, although its pretty obvious on most. That's in an environment where not many care about what you lift.

I can assume in an competitive environment where testing is not as prevalent the use of the stuff would be frequent. You can get it from anyone nowadays and that makes it even more widespread.

Although its a shame and a sign of the times when whenever there is someone who looks well built or lifts big people assume steroid use...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I might just check it out.. A Q among all those skylines.. lol
    • Time will tell, they're doing all the admin stuff at the moment. I've submitted all the required details, photos, etc.   I was under the impression that DC coupling is the best approach, i.e.: Solar Array -> Battery Invertor -> Battery  Where as AC Coupling is simpler, however less efficient, i.e.: Solar Array -> Solar Invertor -> Battery Invertor -> Battery
    • The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more. How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.
    • Long time no random post about shit. So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked. Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries. And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years.  The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/ It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38   I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.    
    • In Vic it would be a defect regardless of whether or not you cut a hole in the sheetmetal for the return pipe. The rules in Vic are shitful, and are generally interpreted as you can "make 2 mods to the intake system". Putting an FFP and an FMI onto it will almost certainly be seen as some huge number of intake mods. You really need to speak to an engineer before doing this stuff in VIC.
×
×
  • Create New...