Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i dont normally take a pre workout simply because I have never noticed a difference in the past when I have taken them.

only gave this one a try as the guy gave me a whole bunch of samples.

didnt read into the marketing. GAT does market a bit like that, but I have read good things about their products.

end of the day it was a sample, I gave it a go and first test was a good one. I have 3 or 4 more samples of it which I will try and report back on.

so these are the claims;

1)SUPER-INTENSIFIED ENERGY*
2)CLINICALLY PROVEN PRO-TESTOSTERONE*
3)REACTIVE HYPEREMIA (MUSCLE PUMPS)*
4)DMAE INFUSED, MIND-IN-THE-MUSCLE FOCUS*
5) ROAD MAP VASODILATION*

What it actually means

1) It's got some calories
2) Doesn't raise testosterone beyond normal or at all in the case of a healthy person (hence not illegal)
3) So what
4) placebo
5) Only applicable if you are lean. If you are a juiced up body builder you have what you need already.
yet another 'short cut' promise that tastes like apples.

so these are the claims;

1)SUPER-INTENSIFIED ENERGY*
2)CLINICALLY PROVEN PRO-TESTOSTERONE*
3)REACTIVE HYPEREMIA (MUSCLE PUMPS)*
4)DMAE INFUSED, MIND-IN-THE-MUSCLE FOCUS*
5) ROAD MAP VASODILATION*

What it actually means

1) It's got some calories
2) Doesn't raise testosterone beyond normal or at all in the case of a healthy person (hence not illegal)
3) So what
4) placebo
5) Only applicable if you are lean. If you are a juiced up body builder you have what you need already.
yet another 'short cut' promise that tastes like apples.

In my experience with Bulk Nutrients' Cognitone PWO, DMAE is more or less the only thing in it that I notice a very distinct benefit from. It's just another analogue of DMAA I believe, and DMAA gave me a very noticeable increase in mental focus....so I guess I'm saying in my opinion, it's far from a placebo.

Like t-boosters. Most only raise your test by 42%. An increase of well over 200% is needed for any real muscular results

I disagree Tom, please stop spreading unfounded misinformation like this.

They raise it by 48%. Get it right.

  • Like 1

dollar for dollar, injecting test would be much cheaper when actual effects are concerned lol

Step 1 - engage in dat dere sexy time 5 times in one day

Step 2 - go to doc, say you can't get it up, request blood test to analyse t-levels

Step 3 - t-levels come back lower than normal (yeah you knew this would happen; inb4 sabotage)

Step 4 - get prescribed test therapy and reap the reward of dem gainz for cheap

might as well cut to the chase and start pinning.

Speaking of which, do pro powerlifters use gear? Probably a Markos question, not judging, genuinely curious.

In an untested federation? Probably. In any competitive environment where people devote their lifestyle towards a cause, you can be sure people will be doing everything they can to get the best out of themselves and get an edge on competition. People do it in tested environments like the Olympics; I don't see why they wouldn't in a situation where it is legal. I would if it was my sport.

Every 2nd guy (ok maybe 3rd guy) in my gym is on the gear. Most are happy to admit it too, although its pretty obvious on most. That's in an environment where not many care about what you lift.

I can assume in an competitive environment where testing is not as prevalent the use of the stuff would be frequent. You can get it from anyone nowadays and that makes it even more widespread.

Although its a shame and a sign of the times when whenever there is someone who looks well built or lifts big people assume steroid use...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...