Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haven't ever really bothered for anything beyond the first exercise, really good stretch first then some light reps of whatever the first exercise is then by the time I'm done on that I'm usually already warmed up or things get warm from racking weights etc.

Work through the motion itself without weight first, it's not hard. If you can do it without weight you can probably do it with. If you can't do it without weight you likely can't do it with.

I actually find it harder to do the proper motion without weight haha....though it's leg day for me today, definitely going to give just squatting for a minute a go before I get into it.

I actually find it harder to do the proper motion without weight haha....though it's leg day for me today, definitely going to give just squatting for a minute a go before I get into it.

ye old TTT said that in the past

If you can't do it without weight, your mobility sucks harder than a hoover.

Yes it's easier to stabilise the body with added weight that you can move around; circus acrobats use a bar on the tightropes. But you shouldn't have to depend on it to do the movement, else you probably have stability/form issues in the movement when using weight too.

Anyone watch Olympia? Heath won followed by Kai.

Felt sorry for Kai he looked shattered

Cutler made top 10 but not final 3, Wolf took third place

Edited by -FIGJAM-

Yeah I didn't pit Cuttler woth much of a chance.

Personally hoping Kai would take ot away but of of the top 3 I thought Wolf had the best bod of the lot.

No idea how the judges determine the winner of these events

Yeah I didn't pit Cuttler woth much of a chance.

Personally hoping Kai would take ot away but of of the top 3 I thought Wolf had the best bod of the lot.

No idea how much money the judges ask for from sponsors to determine the winner of these events

fyp brah

Squatting question as I've been thinking about what I may have been doing wrong previously to aggravate my back/leg.

In the lowest point of the motion, I notice my butt will tuck under a little which implies some rounding in the lower back, is that allowed/a problem/should be avoided etc?

Or should I only go as low as I can before my butt wants to roll/tuck under?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...