Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With the cost of said meals (including chef's pay, all appliances and kitchenware, utilities like gas etc, and delivery) being of absolutely no concern to the man.

Oh also he has all the time he wants to work out. ALL the time.

And finally, gear. Though that's the least relevant point here haha

whilst I don't completely disagree with that point, he would shoot for long periods of time. In Arnies new encyclopedia of bodybuilding he talks about time for regular people, mentions when he went to the gym in the morning there were a few dedicated people also their at 4am (attorneys and such), also when he was first bodybuilding professionally there was only a couple people making a living from the sport.

so whilst he would have time, he would also make time

one of my mates, skinny bloke, got on roids for a brief period of time, said he has never been so hungry in his life

yeah I was gonna say - people want to eat and train like the Rock, but they don't usually seem to grasp the fact of his other supplementation lol..

this is one thing that annoys me. Personally i dont care if someone takes roids, but if you ask the question as to how said person got bigger, imo don't leave it out because its important.

Oh yeah if you want something enough you'll MAKE time for it...unfortunately for some of us that's just too much to ask :( whereas for Teh Rok, he'd have enough cash to retire on the stop....so ultimately he has no overwhelming time commitments he can't ditch, like a job :P

this is one thing that annoys me. Personally i dont care if someone takes roids, but if you ask the question as to how said person got bigger, imo don't leave it out because its important.

i somewhat agree with this however ANYONE and i mean ANYONE (roids or not) if your goal is size then you need to dedicate the time in the gym aswell as the time in the kitchen!

Roids dont just make you big. You still have to work as hard if not harder to get the results

Good point Damo, though yeah I'm with Mitch on what he actually meant - when someone approaches you and asks what supps you take/how you got so huge, if you're gonna answer them answer truthfully.

Also let's not downplay steroids by always saying that you have to work just as hard if not harder to get the results they give...as if natty people are incapable of working out to the same intensity, yet are only restricted by recovery etc. I know I would work out every day and the same muscles if I was able to. I'd also eat like a monster if my body demanded it. The reality is if you took them away from the people who use them, they would be nowhere near where they are. They're illegal for a reason; they work.

I'd of thought they were illegal more so because of the potential health concerns.

Protein supps work, they're not illegal...

That said, I know SFA about steroids so I can't really comment with any conviction.

I know I have no interest in them, that's enough for me.

I meant in sports, sorry should have clarified. But yes they are also illegal because they can be dangerous, and yes dangerous because they do what they are supposed to do, else no one would bother using with the risk.

I don't see why they don't just have a juiced up games.

Let people go nuts on any gear they want. Would see some amazing results and would accelerate the development of various drugs, which could then be used for non sporting reasons in patients etc.

Or do we call that Tour de France these days?

Edited by ActionDan

I don't see why they don't just have a juiced up games.

Let people go nuts on any gear they wont. Would see some amazing results and would accelerate the development of various drugs, which could then be used for non sporting reasons in patients etc.

Or do we call that Tour de France these days?

Boom. f**king lol.

Also let's not downplay steroids by always saying that you have to work just as hard if not harder to get the results they give...as if natty people are incapable of working out to the same intensity, yet are only restricted by recovery etc. I know I would work out every day and the same muscles if I was able to. I'd also eat like a monster if my body demanded it. The reality is if you took them away from the people who use them, they would be nowhere near where they are. They're illegal for a reason; they work.

there was a study on intramuscular testosterone injections that showed that you can gain a considerable amount of lean body mass by simply sitting around on your arse too lol.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101

there was a study on intramuscular testosterone injections that showed that you can gain a considerable amount of lean body mass by simply sitting around on your arse too lol.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101

LOL @ 600mg/wk, that's a pretty damn high dose hahaha

Also LOL @ "weekly" enanthate injections. That ester shouldn't be administered any less frequently than every 3 days.

i somewhat agree with this however ANYONE and i mean ANYONE (roids or not) if your goal is size then you need to dedicate the time in the gym aswell as the time in the kitchen!

Roids dont just make you big. You still have to work as hard if not harder to get the results

To some extent yes, but mostly wrong.

There are plenty of studies around where guys were given test, did no exercise at all, and gained more muscle than guys that were training their asses off.

Getting a little sick of people saying "who cares if he's on roids, he has to work just as hard..blah blah blah".

In reference to becoming an IFBB pro, yes.

In reference to becoming a mad-lad juiced up festival goer that slays facebook broad minded persons day and night, NO.

EDIT: beaten to it by Boz

DOUBLE EDIT: LOL at slag being corrected

Edited by TM7GTR
  • Like 1

i had to laugh @ the local supplement shop selling a tribulus based bro supplement as Post Cycle Therapy though LOL, I suppose if you're that stupid you deserve gyno.

I have no problem with steroids, but think people should at least admit when they are on them so that people can get some idea of what is a realistic result from being 'natty' vs supplemented.

Studies of roid use that show people gaining lean muscle doing nothing . The ones i have seen are all based on skinny slob individuals (normal westerners except choice was for lower end weight people for study). Both before and after roids they are still puny. Low base.

People who i have known go on the juice without modification to diet and excersise (same gym same diet) showed gains. But relative to them . In other words they were still weaker than someone who took training serious and diet. I trained with them on occasion and my training gave me a massive advantage. Looking at the two of us (similar genetics) i would have been picked as the juice taker if someone had a choice.

Also roids cant change genetics. Others i have known went to them after locking in everything else and the gains were significant but not

Ridiculous. It gave a clear edge and speed of devlopment and growth.

Roids are illegal mostly because they work. However Athletes are not average punters . Joe blogs not matter what juice he takes even with gym-bro training aint going to get within spitting distance of a clean athlete. Why ; genetics + training and diet.

Edited by rev210

actually, make a good point Damo,

what i mean was if asked what supplements and shit you take, don't leave it off the list or if asked just say yes

Good point Damo, though yeah I'm with Mitch on what he actually meant - when someone approaches you and asks what supps you take/how you got so huge, if you're gonna answer them answer truthfully.

creatine brah....!

there was a study on intramuscular testosterone injections that showed that you can gain a considerable amount of lean body mass by simply sitting around on your arse too lol.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101

yes but thats alot of a certain thing.....for someone starting for instance on say test/dianabol you think they will get big by sitting around. NO WAY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...