Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

ive tried researching this & have searched various threads also. My R33 has quite hazy headlights which can be riden with various products such as Mother's Plastic Polish etc. Wat im wanting to do is remove the scratches on the lights, im wondering if anyone has used these novus products to do so?

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NOVUS-Plastic-Polis...1QQcmdZViewItem

First two products seem theyd work a treat but i dont know about the third, mayb a lil too abrasive. I dun want to ruin my headlights cos a new pair wuld cost a bundle...thanx in advance! :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201909-cleaning-r33-headlights/
Share on other sites

Personally, I just used some extra cut cream polish (for paint) and they came up pretty good. No need for these "plastic specific" polishes, all the same stuff i reckon, just re-packaged to jack up the price.

Personally, I just used some extra cut cream polish (for paint) and they came up pretty good. No need for these "plastic specific" polishes, all the same stuff i reckon, just re-packaged to jack up the price.

I agree. Mine were really bad when I got the car, my mechanic said to hit it with some 1200 wet/ dry, then cut and polish. They are as clear as glass now, looks so much better. I usually cut and polish them every few months as they start to go a bit cloudy again.

I've cut and polished mine - looks alot better than when the car first arrived... but it still has some yuckiness to it - it look as though its on the inside of the headlight... should I keep going with the cut and polish?

I've cut and polished mine - looks alot better than when the car first arrived... but it still has some yuckiness to it - it look as though its on the inside of the headlight... should I keep going with the cut and polish?

I'd say yes. I did mine about 10 times to start with, each time getting better and better until it was perfectly clear. When they are wet do they look good? Usually they do and that suggests that everything is on the outside. Might I add they didnt look too bad when I saw your car at Auto Perfection the other day, nice car. They didnt put a sticker on my car, did you get one?

I'd say yes. I did mine about 10 times to start with, each time getting better and better until it was perfectly clear. When they are wet do they look good? Usually they do and that suggests that everything is on the outside. Might I add they didnt look too bad when I saw your car at Auto Perfection the other day, nice car. They didnt put a sticker on my car, did you get one?

Not sure on the wet thing but probably take a look at it again later - can definitely see the yuckness in the sun.

And yeah I got a small sticker just underneath the rear windscreen wiper.

Hey all.....is it just the 33's that suffer from this or do the 32's & 34's have the same problem.....mine seem pretty clear.

I suppose it's a combination of fall out and UV that causes the problem?

They all do. My old 34 suffered as well, and fixed it with some plastic polish (and lots of scrubbing).

use Autosol metal polish. they come out fkn crystal clear!

Yeah I use something similar on the bike's stainless steel just before a show and you can't tell if it's stainless or chrome.

'Liquid Reflection' metal polish.

Il be giving that a go soon but any idea how to take the clear cover of the light so i change the chrome to black?

u gotta heat the plastic up and pry the cover off with a screwdriver, its sealed on with urethane :)

Damn those headlights were filthy!

thats actually what the lights look like after sanding them :(

the pic quality wasnt too good cos i used my phone cam

all we do at work when we get 2nd hand headlights and they are like that is just get cut n polish and scrub away and they look like new! we just use the normal cut n polish you use on the car paint. works fine

Before trying any expensive polish, try getting a rag/cloth and rubbing toothpaste onto the headlights. Its not perfect but I've found it does give quite good results. Just make sure not to get any on the paint!! This goes for any cut and polish as well. Normal polish is ok on paint but cut and polish will normally wreck your metallic/pearl paint.

Pretty sure all skylines have this problem with faded headlights. Stageas are the same too. :)

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...