Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

i was just wondering about what would be involved with removing a turbo from a gtst. I got my p plates a few weeks ago and have been a keen skyline fan for many years now and am look to buy a R32 or R33 as my first car. But due to the new p plate law in queensland i am unable to drive a car with a turbo so i have been looking for a gts. But as i have found out that a gts in my price range is a bit hard to come by ( as i am a 1st year apprentice ) so i was thinking of just buying a gtst in my price range and removing the turbo if it is all possible to do with costing lots of money. Any help will be greatly welcome.

Cheers Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/202342-removing-a-turbo-from-a-gtst/
Share on other sites

Congrats on getting your Ps...now...i firmly beleive that a rwd turbo like a skyline or silvia is not a good first car for a novice driver...and i think that many will back me up on this...i'd recommend trying something alittle more forgiving before you tread this path...

Now as for de-turboing a skyline...if that is what you are talking about...there is no way of doing it...not without changing a fair load of stuff...and after that...it will still run like crap and be slower than a NA equivalent due to lower compression...so...don't take it the wrong way but its a stupid idea...you are better off buying a NA skyline first and then swapping the motors at a much later date after you get more driving experience and can afford it...

If i read your post right you are saying that in qld it is cheaper to get a gtst than a gts??

Im also guessing that the power to weight ratio laws are the same as in in vic and im pretty sure that in vic you can drive an R32 gtst on your p's.

in my opinion, i honestly wouldnt think its worth all the hassle deturboing a car. Because it is for a first car as well, you shouldnt spend too much on it. If there were any more problems afterwards then it will definetely cost more to fix.

I reckon getting a skyline for a first is a good choice as long as ur SENSIBLE about driving it. its also good experience coz the way i see the restrictions are a good thing of keeping ppl safe but as soon as ppl jump into a high powered car straight after they get their fulls, then they wouldnt know how to handle it which can also be just as bad.

The point of buying Nissan is for a turbo IMO.

If you're going NA (that's the only realistic option) there's better NA's than Nissan for several reasons (such as any Honda will be lighter than an R33 = economical, good for apprentice wages) and why bother with something that isn't great to begin with :ph34r: .

I'd go a Civic/Integra or Celica with light mods (exhaust/intake/ECU/increase compression a little) until full licence. Still fun but realistic. Keep for a year or two and learn how to take corners (if you're a virgin :) ).

I got my R33 at 22 years old, full licence, and appreciate it heaps more cause I was driving a dog box corolla for all these years.

Edited by R338OY
The point of buying Nissan is for a turbo IMO.

If you're going NA (that's the only realistic option) there's better NA's than Nissan for several reasons (such as any Honda will be lighter than an R33 = economical, good for apprentice wages) and why bother with something that isn't great to begin with :ph34r: .

I'd go a Civic/Integra or Celica with light mods (exhaust/intake/ECU/increase compression a little) until full licence. Still fun but realistic. Keep for a year or two and learn how to take corners (if you're a virgin :) ).

I got my R33 at 22 years old, full licence, and appreciate it heaps more cause I was driving a dog box corolla for all these years.

the new laws state you can't do any performance mods on your p's, well that's in nsw, don't know about qld

There are a number of threads similar to this, but i swear there was a post if you remove the turbo, it is still registered and classed as a turbo vehicle?? may be wrong but swear i read it on one similar post.

Hope that helps

hey i have a N/A skyline and i would recomend it better than deturboing a car. keeps the compression and would there be problems with computer not recognising a turbo there just wondering

whats your budget cause there are some nice n/a's out there mine goes fine good power and can easily drop turbo in later

just get a gts4

R32 GTS4's are turbos, R33's are non turbo as they have an rb25 engine and that with 4WD would be too close to a GTR. Well thats the reasoning i heard way back when i got mine. I agree with r33boy if you want something you can enjoy with a bit of grunt then stick to a smaller car. a big NA skyline really doesnt put a smile on your face when the foot goes down.

Well i am not sure if the laws are the same between NSW and QLD all i know is that i cannot drive a car with a turbo, heavily modded engine or a v8. I am looking to spend around $10 to $15 K all depends how much i have saved up by the end of the year and how much i will be able to borrow. As for a gtst costing more then a gts in QLD there are not alot of gts for sale that i can find right now but i have not been looking really hard just looking for now. There are a few gts that i have found but they are either auto or cost more then $15 K. And i mean no offence to all your guy who have a skyline thats auto but really having an ayuto skyline just would not be the same. Also about the being sensible i am a pannelbeater and have seen some pretty messed up cars from people doing stupid things and i am not like that. Speeding, drifting and burnouts should be done either at the drags or on a race track.

Thanks all for your posts they have helped me with this.

Chris

Why not look around for a dinged up late model honda, should be able to make money, and enjoy the driving experience?PS a VTi-R is about as quick as a GTS-t, so you can have your cake and eat it too.

Edited by Adriano

i would be unsure of how u could BUY a turbo if u cant one have one?!?!

and even if u deturbo it and replace piping and electronic, what are u going to do about the VIN? and the other ID plates?

  • 3 months later...

i have a 33 4door gtst and last month my turbo carked it, since then i have bought a new one but have not got around to installing it yet.

point being:

i have a fmic and simply removed the piping going over the top of the engine block blocked off the end coming from the cooler and blocked where the pod and airflow metre was and put my pod and afm straight onto the throttle body. works fine. admittably not quite as powerful as NA and a hell of a lot louder. but no running issues at all.

in saying this i live in qld and previous posts are correct if the car is manurfactured as turbo, v8 or is modified fo rperformance in any way, p platers cannot register in their name or drive these cars as at 29/06/07.

neway good luck choosing you first ride mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...