Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question.

I have just gotten my hands on a rb30det (loom, ecu, turbo all there), with rb25 gearbox, and was planning on stuffing these into my r32 manual gtst. Having basically very little knowledge, and no experience in doing this conversion, I was wondering whether there are any issues with this proposed conversion, or does the engine fit straight in, like a rb25 would?

I am planning on ripping out the rb20det and gearbox out myself, respraying my engine bay and then towing the car to the shop that is going to do the conversion. but to save on time, and any potential hassles, was wondering whether i would need to provide any additional bits and pieces for this. I have purchased some new engine mounts, but apart from that, i can't think of anything else that they might need.

Any help on this would be appreciated, as the car will probably be going in on either monday or tuesday.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/202546-rb30det-into-r32/
Share on other sites

well that's good news. what about all the mounting and bracing underneath? all lines up fine? already got a front facing plenum on it, so should hopefully have no worries. will have to see about the high mount turbo though. might need a new manifold for it

the solution is to modify the Rb20 engine mounts (metal brackets) and cut them down some 20 mm then reweld them up, this will lower the engine to a more desirable height, however the sway bar will foul and the sump will be lower then the crossmember, so spacve the bar down and fit a bashplate and these issues are then nothing to worry about.

I had to remove my strut brace, have a stock 25DE plenum on there and it rubs slightly on the front corner and also slightly on the timing belt cover.. I spaced the back of the bonnet up 10mm so it doesnt try to buckle the bonnet every time I shut it..

Forward facing plenum will go on with the new turbo, all measurements for the GT35R high mount appear that it will clear as it will sit just below the crossover pipe. Will likely "massage" the timing belt cover slightly, don't need to gain much.. 5mm maybe.

Does the 30 have all the ancillaries bolted on? if not you'll need to modify the power steering pump bracket (cut the top boss flush with the lower two), other than that I don't remember anything else that needed modifying (apart from shuffling all the pipework so the bonnet would close!).

Edited by bubba

RB30 did not end up fitting. Mainly due to the design of the front facing plenum on the thing. Stuck up by a couple of centimetres. Could have had another plenum fabricated, but that and the retune would have put my budget out by a fair bit. So rb25 it was. Car will be back on the road on monday at the latest. Trying to source a bloody pfc at the moment that is reasonably priced is proving impossible as well.

also, if somebody in the brisbane area has a r32 2way they are willing to sell, pm me :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...