Jump to content
SAU Community

Hot Version 91 - (r35gtr Vs R34, R33, R32 Tuners)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice brag'n rights for those of us with "old school" GTR's now :P

Yeah but the 32 wasnt in the same category IMO, it needed some GT-RS's or a TO4Z instead of the GT-SS's (if my memory serves me) it had - they sucked!

i cant get any of those links to work, im assuming these are the cars ur talking about though

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lh4Jv4E9_Ac

i was hoping the 32 could do better :teehee: o well's at least it gave em a run for their money

we got any fluent japanese people :) did they adjust the 4wd torque settings in the 32. im under the impression thats the main disadvantage of the 32 its tail happy nature from less power to the front wheels

where in the vid does the 33 hit the 34? they seem to be running these laps by themselves from what i can see, i miss something?

no kpg gtr time :D

Edited by gzilla
im under the impression thats the main disadvantage of the 32 its tail happy nature from less power to the front wheels

Nah

Watch it again, read what turbos it had, then watch the others with real turbos pull away from it.

It needed more power

nice watching it now

also heres a link of all four of them in a race http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7FxSS8oUZs...feature=related

the R35 came 3rd but the drivers of the tuned 32,33 and 34 seem to struggle a bit more when driving their cars where as the R35 driver was pretty calm and composed lol

  • 1 month later...

What more can you ask for in a video?

Bloody loved the R33, my pick of the lot. The MCR R34 was the weapon though, awesome track car.

Interesting how easy it is for the R35 to calmly keep up with monster GTRs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...