Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just put the figures in the dyno tool paul was quite interesting maybe gtrs aren't to bad comes on about the same as my setup but with heaps more in the midrange.... As Cubes said earlier its hard to compare dyno graph but there you go.....

Screenshot??

quite easy to compare dyno graphs if the dyno's are operated correctly. Between Croydon's Dyno Dynamics and Autosalon's Mainline we usually only see a couple of KW's difference, but thats a topic for another thread.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653613
Share on other sites

Agreed Cubes but to make another 50kw that low down where its not making much boost regardless of how it was loaded is quite impressive..

Hey Guys,

I thought this post would stir some interest.

Now, the 450@wheels top end is okay, but check the torque curve and compare it to other rb's.

It makes like twice a normal rb between 2-4500!

This is the area most gtr owners complain about.

It is bizarre to drive, kinda like a quiet 6 litre n/a v12 that makes 600whp and revs to 9k....

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

cheers,

Ben

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653621
Share on other sites

Surely lowly RB20 owners would not be able to afford welding and therefore resort to race taping the 2 blocks together.

That's just stupid man, everyone knows you need to use zip ties to put 2 RB20's together. Noob.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653773
Share on other sites

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

Yep - I don't know what you did to mine but in the quick drive I had last week it sure has changed down low. I honestly thought at first you had changed turbo's on me. So I don't know if you have started tinkering with your ideas on a 2.6 already?

Still - it's nothing compared to yours now I'm sure. It sure looks impressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3653815
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

I thought this post would stir some interest.

Now, the 450@wheels top end is okay, but check the torque curve and compare it to other rb's.

It makes like twice a normal rb between 2-4500!

This is the area most gtr owners complain about.

It is bizarre to drive, kinda like a quiet 6 litre n/a v12 that makes 600whp and revs to 9k....

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

cheers,

Ben

Its truely mental...and i thought our torque curve was fat and flat. Its the ultimate circuit/street engine set-up. The linear power delivery would ensure a well balanced car coming onto the power through the twisties. Again Ben...job well done mate.

Tomm0...run in tune with BP98 as stated.

OFENSV, was done in 3rd to stop turbo shuffle, actually made another 10KW the night before at CRD in 4th gear. Jim just knows how to ramp it properly in 4th to stop it, old mate at Autosalon is not as experienced as Jim...hence 3rd gear.

now back to chatting about this bloody torque monster.

EDIT: Ben, any chance of getting a torque printout in a better scale...say 5000-15000N (motive force) or a 100-1300NM (torque).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3654087
Share on other sites

QUOTE(RPMGTR @ 18 Feb 2008, 01:22 PM) *

I think we can get similiar improvements from the 2.6 as well.

:D

Hrm... i dunno wether to be excited or extremely worried about that :banana:

EXACTLY.....i just got mine back and i thought it was finished....clearly not :)

happy to donate it for 'testing'

hahahahahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3654379
Share on other sites

Man, insane results - well done :teehee: There was a guy in NZ running I think low 11s (at least) with his R32 with what was rumoured to be an RB25 (or 26?) running an RD28 crank and rods and some aftermarket pistons resulting in a 2.9l. Not sure how much there is to that rumour, I've hunted around trying to find information on the parts to see if it can be or has been done and documented but to no avail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206406-rb29-wow/page/3/#findComment-3655742
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...